|
Post by Harold of Whoa on Mar 13, 2018 13:58:26 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2018 14:33:53 GMT
We should have kept .
|
|
|
Post by My NoRevisionism Pillow on Mar 13, 2018 16:16:50 GMT
BOOBIES!
|
|
|
Post by ayatollah on Mar 13, 2018 17:01:03 GMT
I'm not sure Russia did it, but it's not an attack on NATO, but NATO spying on Russia here. Skripal was a western spy.
I suspect western governments blame them so they can discredit nationalists within their own countries, get them out of the way, then continue globalizing their populations unabated.
|
|
|
Post by Harold of Whoa on Mar 13, 2018 17:38:18 GMT
I'm not sure Russia did it, but it's not an attack on NATO, but NATO spying on Russia here. Skripal was a western spy. I suspect western governments blame them so they can discredit nationalists within their own countries, get them out of the way, then continue globalizing their populations unabated. So, wait.... Are you saying that if some Russian defector had been nerve gassed in New York City, with a score or so 'innocent' casualties, including a cop, that the US non-globalist president would just brush it off as some local criminal matter? That's nuts. They used premium grade military nerve agent (as if there is another kind) that only comes from Russia. Putin's not just taking care of business, here; he's sending a message. You should try to figure out what that message is. It's the same thing back with the polonium poisoning. You don't do shit like that because you are covering your tracks, you do it as a calling card. And, yes, it is an attack on NATO. I would also point out to you that your soft-on-Russia stance puts you much more in line with globalist Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, so maybe you should reconsider how this is a globalist misdirection play by, um, Theresa May.
|
|
|
Post by scienceisgod on Mar 13, 2018 17:57:44 GMT
I'm not sure Russia did it, but it's not an attack on NATO, but NATO spying on Russia here. Skripal was a western spy. I suspect western governments blame them so they can discredit nationalists within their own countries, get them out of the way, then continue globalizing their populations unabated. So, wait.... Are you saying that if some Russian defector had been nerve gassed in New York City, with a score or so 'innocent' casualties, including a cop, that the US non-globalist president would just brush it off as some local criminal matter? That's nuts. They used premium grade military nerve agent (as if there is another kind) that only comes from Russia. Putin's not just taking care of business, here; he's sending a message. You should try to figure out what that message is. It's the same thing back with the polonium poisoning. You don't do shit like that because you are covering your tracks, you do it as a calling card. And, yes, it is an attack on NATO. I would also point out to you that your soft-on-Russia stance puts you much more in line with globalist Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, so maybe you should reconsider how this is a globalist misdirection play by, um, Theresa May. Why is NATO sending spies into Russia? How do we know NATO didn’t kill its own spy as a pretext to more espionage, which it is apparently doing openly! This is how the Progressvies started the first World War. They dressed up the Lusitania like a warship and sent it into hotstile territory with the INTENTION of having it sank and killing innocent people.
|
|
|
Post by Harold of Whoa on Mar 13, 2018 18:35:17 GMT
Why is NATO sending spies into Russia? How do we know NATO didn’t kill its own spy as a pretext to more espionage, which it is apparently doing openly! This is how the Progressvies started the first World War. They dressed up the Lusitania like a warship and sent it into hotstile territory with the INTENTION of having it sank and killing innocent people. Thank you for following instructions (and it barely took 3 hours). BTW, please elaborate on the concept of NATO sending spies, either in this case or generally. How many people work in the NATO spy service? Do you get good benefits if you are a NATO spy? Where does one sign up?
|
|
|
Post by ayatollah on Mar 13, 2018 19:15:56 GMT
I'm not sure Russia did it, but it's not an attack on NATO, but NATO spying on Russia here. Skripal was a western spy. I suspect western governments blame them so they can discredit nationalists within their own countries, get them out of the way, then continue globalizing their populations unabated. So, wait.... Are you saying that if some Russian defector had been nerve gassed in New York City, with a score or so 'innocent' casualties, including a cop, that the US non-globalist president would just brush it off as some local criminal matter? That's nuts. They used premium grade military nerve agent (as if there is another kind) that only comes from Russia. Putin's not just taking care of business, here; he's sending a message. You should try to figure out what that message is. It's the same thing back with the polonium poisoning. You don't do shit like that because you are covering your tracks, you do it as a calling card. And, yes, it is an attack on NATO. I would also point out to you that your soft-on-Russia stance puts you much more in line with globalist Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, so maybe you should reconsider how this is a globalist misdirection play by, um, Theresa May. If Corbyn wants to end his countries military involvements overseas and try to have better relations with Russia, North Korea, etc. fine. I still think he is an open-borders guy and couldn't support that. I'm not say this couldn't have been Russia, or that it's justified if it was. I just know this will be used to attack nationalists, what the fuck do you want from us? I don't see your point.
|
|
|
Post by slowcomingwarbird on Mar 13, 2018 20:41:00 GMT
The Russian FSB instigated a terrorist attack near London involving a type of nerve gas that was uniquely developed in Russia. Russians made taunting statements about it afterwards. Rex Tillerson wanted to act on it but for some reason Trump doesn't want any involvement in anything that might go against Russia, which is the real reason why Rex Tillerson was fired. Now Mike Pompeo is set to take Rex Tillerson's place at the state department and Gina Haspel is set to take Mike Pompeo's place as chief of the CIA. Here is the problem with that: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gina_HaspelAs you should see that Gina Haspel is a really nasty piece of work, a modern day equivalent of Ilse Koch who made the infamous lamp shade out of human skin from detainees. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilse_KochSo now you can expect that there will be more cover ups, more torture of detainees kept at secret "black site" locations, more indefinite imprisonment without due process or trial. Donald Trump is shaping up to be the next new equivalent of Adolf Hitler with each passing day except that Adolf Hitler had better taste in food and what he did with his spare time than Trump does.
|
|
|
Post by ayatollah on Mar 13, 2018 20:45:43 GMT
The Russian FSB instigated a terrorist attack near London involving a type of nerve gas that was uniquely developed in Russia. Russians made taunting statements about it afterwards. Rex Tillerson wanted to act on it but for some reason Trump doesn't want any involvement in anything that might go against Russia, which is the real reason why Rex Tillerson was fired. Now Mike Pompeo is set to take Rex Tillerson's place at the state department and Gina Haspel is set to take Mike Pompeo's place as chief of the CIA. Here is the problem with that: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gina_HaspelAs you should see that Gina Haspel is a really nasty piece of work, a modern day equivalent of Ilse Koch who made the infamous lamp shade out of human skin from detainees. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilse_KochSo now you can expect that there will be more cover ups, more torture of detainees kept at secret "black site" locations, more indefinite imprisonment without due process or trial. Donald Trump is shaping up to be the next new equivalent of Adolf Hitler with each passing day except that Adolf Hitler had better taste in food and what he did with his spare time than Trump does. So do you want WW3 or to try and stop this nonsense?
|
|
|
Post by slowcomingwarbird on Mar 13, 2018 21:56:36 GMT
The Russian FSB instigated a terrorist attack near London involving a type of nerve gas that was uniquely developed in Russia. Russians made taunting statements about it afterwards. Rex Tillerson wanted to act on it but for some reason Trump doesn't want any involvement in anything that might go against Russia, which is the real reason why Rex Tillerson was fired. Now Mike Pompeo is set to take Rex Tillerson's place at the state department and Gina Haspel is set to take Mike Pompeo's place as chief of the CIA. Here is the problem with that: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gina_HaspelAs you should see that Gina Haspel is a really nasty piece of work, a modern day equivalent of Ilse Koch who made the infamous lamp shade out of human skin from detainees. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilse_KochSo now you can expect that there will be more cover ups, more torture of detainees kept at secret "black site" locations, more indefinite imprisonment without due process or trial. Donald Trump is shaping up to be the next new equivalent of Adolf Hitler with each passing day except that Adolf Hitler had better taste in food and what he did with his spare time than Trump does. So do you want WW3 or to try and stop this nonsense? What is that, a threat from yet another Russian Troll? Way to get all bent out of shape just because I dropped a little truth on you... Think about the secret meeting on the Seychelles island to establish a back channel to Russia and why it was kept a secret for so long... Which proves consciousness of guilt, the Trump administration knew they were doing something wrong and so they tried to keep it a secret. Putin already had a former Russian agent killed near London, and another in New York. How much longer before Putin sends assassins to poison politicians in the U.K and the U.S. Just how far is that going to be allowed to continue before something is done about it?
|
|
|
Post by Harold of Whoa on Mar 14, 2018 0:05:01 GMT
If Corbyn wants to end his countries military involvements overseas and try to have better relations with Russia, North Korea, etc. fine. I still think he is an open-borders guy and couldn't support that. I'm not say this couldn't have been Russia, or that it's justified if it was. I just know this will be used to attack nationalists, what the fuck do you want from us? I don't see your point. Do you really not? The point is that you are compiling a record of deflecting any criticism of Putin for being a murderer and international gangster by saying the critics are just secret globalists trying to divert world attention from the grand plot of browning, emasculation and cultural destruction. That's utter nonsense. If anyone on this earth is on board with the globalists, it's Corbyn, but he's the one trying to tamp down the righteous outrage against Russia for this atrocity, and Theresa May, the one who is at least modestly shepherding Britain through Brexit, is the one who is calling out (correctly) the international aggression by the mass murderer Dr. StrangePute. I wish you could recognize the existence of more than one problem at a time. Globalism is a problem. Russia is a problem. Both are really serious threats. I will give you this, though, you are consistent. Your take on the filthy cowardly nerve gas attack is almost identical to your take on the filthy cowardly invasion of Ukraine...namely "What act of war? Who cares if a few travelling Russians on holiday show up in a sovereign nation with tanks or military nerve agent and take care of a bit of business? If Putin can come up with a hazy justification why the cross-border use of force is really 'Russian sphere of influence', then that's good enough for Ayatollah"...except that Putin never has the 'nads to own up to the act, it's always up to his nutsack nibblers to acknowledge the deed and dream up the reason why it's cool. I notice you ignored my first question to you, so I am going to ask it again: Are you saying that if some Russian defector had been nerve gassed in New York City, with a score or so 'innocent' casualties, including a cop, that the US non-globalist president would just brush it off as some local criminal matter? That's nuts.
|
|
|
Post by ayatollah on Mar 14, 2018 0:21:23 GMT
If Corbyn wants to end his countries military involvements overseas and try to have better relations with Russia, North Korea, etc. fine. I still think he is an open-borders guy and couldn't support that. I'm not say this couldn't have been Russia, or that it's justified if it was. I just know this will be used to attack nationalists, what the fuck do you want from us? I don't see your point. Do you really not? The point is that you are compiling a record of deflecting any criticism of Putin for being a murderer and international gangster by saying the critics are just secret globalists trying to divert world attention from the grand plot of browning, emasculation and cultural destruction. That's utter nonsense. If anyone on this earth is on board with the globalists, it's Corbyn, but he's the one trying to tamp down the righteous outrage against Russia for this atrocity, and Theresa May, the one who is at least modestly shepherding Britain through Brexit, is the one who is calling out (correctly) the international aggression by the mass murderer Dr. StrangePute. I wish you could recognize the existence of more than one problem at a time. Globalism is a problem. Russia is a problem. Both are really serious threats. I will give you this, though, you are consistent. Your take on the filthy cowardly nerve gas attack is almost identical to your take on the filthy cowardly invasion of Ukraine...namely "What act of war? Who cares if a few travelling Russians on holiday show up in a sovereign nation with tanks or military nerve agent and take care of a bit of business? If Putin can come up with a hazy justification why the cross-border use of force is really 'Russian sphere of influence', then that's good enough for Ayatollah"...except that Putin never has the 'nads to own up to the act, it's always up to his nutsack nibblers to acknowledge the deed and dream up the reason why it's cool. I notice you ignored my first question to you, so I am going to ask it again: Are you saying that if some Russian defector had been nerve gassed in New York City, with a score or so 'innocent' casualties, including a cop, that the US non-globalist president would just brush it off as some local criminal matter? That's nuts. I know Putin is a bad dude and I don't fault Britain for responding however they feel they need to. But I also know why Glenn Beck has lost his shit over it. He wants to turn the right away from nationalism as much as possible. He wants you to make adopting African kids the mark of conservatism. And no, I don't care about Ukraine or Syria. I've always been opposed to the US being world wide military police. Russia isn't an existential threat.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2018 0:21:34 GMT
yeah they still think Russia and Trump are in collusion when Putin is poisoning people on UK soil. yeah okay LOL
riiiiiiiiiiiight.
libtards are really gullible
|
|
|
Post by Harold of Whoa on Mar 14, 2018 1:48:50 GMT
Russia isn't an existential threat. Um, well...okay. I may have to make that my new sig. Bae, I'm pretty sure that the definition of "existential threat" is a country that has enough warheads to convert your entire nation into a pile of radioactive soot and is run by a lawless autocrat who loves to brag about all the new and exotic indefensible ways he is developing to use them on you. The other alternative is that there is no such thing possible as an existential threat to the US in your worldview, in which case why even bring it up? Hakuna matata! That reminds me of someone...someone famous...oh, yeah, Barack Obama and all the Dems in the 2012 election making fun of Romney. So, just to review, guy on the radio suggesting Christians should step up and foster/adopt kids = existential threat; guy with 2nd biggest nuclear arsenal on Earth engaging in bellicose ranting, hacking the shit out of our networks, killing his opposition at home and abroad with absolute impunity, slinging nerve gas about the English countryside, invading countries with phantom quasi-armies =/= existential threat. Got it.
|
|