|
|
Post by yggdrasil on Jul 14, 2022 13:16:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Jul 14, 2022 13:28:54 GMT
Bank? No.
How about the ad network that accepted and transmitted the advert? Are they not complicit in fraud for giving fraudsters a platform and spreading their message?
|
|
|
|
Post by yggdrasil on Jul 14, 2022 14:22:36 GMT
Bank? No. How about the ad network that accepted and transmitted the advert? Are they not complicit in fraud for giving fraudsters a platform and spreading their message? Was an internet search that found it and the bloke put his phone no. in, not sure you can hold Google or whomever responsible for stupidity. But the bank refunding someone who has been repeatedly warned yet still continues to the point of even contacting the scammer himself to offer more money, is a bad signal. Also we all pay for it in bank charges. |
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Jul 14, 2022 15:34:02 GMT
Bank? No. How about the ad network that accepted and transmitted the advert? Are they not complicit in fraud for giving fraudsters a platform and spreading their message? Was an internet search that found it Report says "In March 2021, I saw an advert online". That usually means an ad network that is serving the ad to a load of websites (e.g. all the banner and tower ads you see on many website you go to). No, but they are aiding criminals (if it was Google ad network). Whichever network, they helped the criminals. |
|
|
|
Post by yggdrasil on Jul 14, 2022 16:28:22 GMT
Was an internet search that found it Report says "In March 2021, I saw an advert online". That usually means an ad network that is serving the ad to a load of websites (e.g. all the banner and tower ads you see on many website you go to). No, but they are aiding criminals (if it was Google ad network). Whichever network, they helped the criminals. You'd have no working internet as we know it if everything had to be held to the scrutiny you suggest though, would take a long time to check the veracity of even 1 entry. The Nanny state taken to the Nth degree. You have to allow people the ability to be complete morons, don't you? |
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Jul 14, 2022 17:31:12 GMT
Report says "In March 2021, I saw an advert online". That usually means an ad network that is serving the ad to a load of websites (e.g. all the banner and tower ads you see on many website you go to). No, but they are aiding criminals (if it was Google ad network). Whichever network, they helped the criminals. You'd have no working internet as we know it if everything had to be held to the scrutiny you suggest though, would take a long time to check the veracity of even 1 entry. The Nanny state taken to the Nth degree. You have to allow people the ability to be complete morons, don't you? No, just the ads. Pages can load as normal - it's just the ads being accepted into the ad serving network that would be checked. A page can load as normal without there being any content in the ad block. |
|
