|
Post by yggdrasil on Sept 16, 2023 10:10:22 GMT
Don't read newspapers beyond what people put up on here, but traditionally the "Torygraph" is just that, the print voice of the Tory party, always has been and always will be I should think, even when the bank sells it off shortly to The Mail Group or whomever. They have never even pretended to be a fair Newspaper. Personally I dislike the Guardian far more as it pretends to be something it isn't which is a left wing newspaper. Reality is that it's a whiny Blairite rag that along with all the rest attacked Corbyn relentlessly for his Socialist views, especially the appalling Polly Toynbee. Seems to be nothing but terrible click bait opinion pieces aimed at winding up the "foam at the mouth" "gammon" brigade. Pretend left wing politics for the worst kind of whiny, trendy, dinner party faux socialists. Just the reverse side of the Mail on line clickbait factory, both utterly dishonest. I think the Guardian exposes the difference between 'liberal' and 'leftist'. It's a newspaper for the congenitally smug.
|
|
|
Post by notoriousnobbi on Sept 17, 2023 5:42:40 GMT
I think - regardless of which media one does use - one has always has to have a look at the single authors and keep their individual biases in mind.
I often 'admire' the absurdities some conservativehome authors write when they try to put some grains of truth into the whole lying agenda they have to follow. I remember the names then.
But back to the Guardian. It's the readers who comment that make the read of the articles so worthwhile. They can lead you to good sources you wouldn't be able to find otherwise.
|
|