|
Post by ant-mac on Dec 28, 2023 0:06:26 GMT
1. Don't tell me you're interested in urophilia. 2. If indeed you are afflicted with any of those conditions, you can hardly be expected to give a rational or reasonable opinion on the matter. 1. No, but I bet you are.
2. One can't be reasonable with the unreasonable.
1. You'd lose that bet. 2. As you've ably demonstrated.
|
|
|
Post by ant-mac on Dec 28, 2023 0:08:53 GMT
Also a term used in a science fiction franchise called THE TOMORROW PEOPLE. And I'm sure his parents were a great disappointment to him. Imagine your child having you for a parent. What a disappointment...
Did you decide to avoid that inevitable predicament for yourself?
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Dec 28, 2023 0:14:56 GMT
Imagine your child having you for a parent. What a disappointment... Did you decide to avoid that inevitable predicament for yourself? The real predicament is, that parents don't take a good look at themselves and decide if they would really be ideal as a parent. Most do it to suit their own self-gratifications and are trapped by the conventions of societal conditioning because they are morons.
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Dec 28, 2023 0:17:28 GMT
1. No, but I bet you are.
2. One can't be reasonable with the unreasonable.
1. You'd lose that bet. 2. As you've ably demonstrated. I know I've demonstrated that meat eating humans don't give a shit about eating slaughtered animals and then pretend to care about them.
|
|
|
Post by ant-mac on Dec 28, 2023 0:56:53 GMT
Did you decide to avoid that inevitable predicament for yourself? 1. The real predicament is, that parents don't take a good look at themselves and decide if they would really be ideal as a parent. 2. Most do it to suit their own self-gratifications and are trapped by the conventions of societal conditioning because they are morons. 1. That's certainly true. 2. I'm not sure if that's the actual reason, although it could certainly be one of them. However, I believe there are a range of reasons.
|
|
|
Post by ant-mac on Dec 28, 2023 0:57:37 GMT
1. You'd lose that bet. 2. As you've ably demonstrated. I know I've demonstrated that meat eating humans don't give a shit about eating slaughtered animals and then pretend to care about them. In your own mind perhaps... Reality is a different matter.
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Dec 28, 2023 1:07:39 GMT
I know I've demonstrated that meat eating humans don't give a shit about eating slaughtered animals and then pretend to care about them. In your own mind perhaps... Reality is a different matter. Whose reality though, the one of the phony caring meat-eaters?
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Dec 28, 2023 1:08:12 GMT
1. The real predicament is, that parents don't take a good look at themselves and decide if they would really be ideal as a parent. 2. Most do it to suit their own self-gratifications and are trapped by the conventions of societal conditioning because they are morons. 1. That's certainly true. 2. I'm not sure if that's the actual reason, although it could certainly be one of them. However, I believe there are a range of reasons. People become parents for different reasons, but just because one can have kids, doesn't mean they should.
|
|
|
Post by ant-mac on Dec 28, 2023 1:10:22 GMT
In your own mind perhaps... Reality is a different matter. Whose reality though, the one of the phony caring meat-eaters? You should make up your mind about whether they are uncaring or phoney caring. If they're truly uncaring, why would they be bothered to fake it?
|
|
|
Post by ant-mac on Dec 28, 2023 1:11:11 GMT
1. That's certainly true. 2. I'm not sure if that's the actual reason, although it could certainly be one of them. However, I believe there are a range of reasons. People become parents for different reasons, but just because one can have kids, doesn't mean they should. No argument here. In fact, the same can be said about other things as well.
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Dec 28, 2023 1:19:20 GMT
Whose reality though, the one of the phony caring meat-eaters? You should make up your mind about whether they are uncaring or phoney caring. If they're truly uncaring, why would they be bothered to fake it? It can be both.
Why claim that one cares for animals and then eat them?
We don't need to eat meat for the most part. Its just become another industrial complex. If one is an Eskimo say, they are limited to what is available and fish is a main source of sustenance. For Western humans when there are a myriad of choices, most human beans make the worst ones.
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Dec 28, 2023 1:21:19 GMT
People become parents for different reasons, but just because one can have kids, doesn't mean they should. No argument here. In fact, the same can be said about other things as well. Many things we do that we perhaps shouldn't do, but human nature isn't very disciplined. We are selfish beings, (well Im not, I'm superior lol), but too much hypocrisy and sense of self is what is at the core corruption of human nature.
|
|
|
Post by ant-mac on Dec 28, 2023 1:26:12 GMT
You should make up your mind about whether they are uncaring or phoney caring. If they're truly uncaring, why would they be bothered to fake it? 1. It can be both.
2. Why claim that one cares for animals and then eat them?
3. We don't need to eat meat for the most part. Its just become another industrial complex. If one is an Eskimo say, they are limited to what is available and fish is a main source of sustenance. For Western humans when there are a myriad of choices, most human beans make the worst ones. 1. It can be, but why would it be? 2. For similar reasons that one can claim to care for family, friends, work colleagues and so forth and still join the military in times of war and kill enemy combatants. 3. Our species was eating meat long before there were any industrial complexes. It's one of the main reasons our species rose to dominance and we are both able to argue about it on the internet via computers or other technological devices.
|
|
|
Post by ant-mac on Dec 28, 2023 1:26:56 GMT
No argument here. In fact, the same can be said about other things as well. Many things we do that we perhaps shouldn't do, but human nature isn't very disciplined. We are selfish beings, (well Im not, I'm superior lol), but too much hypocrisy and sense of self is what is at the core corruption of human nature. Of course you are... You keep telling yourself that.
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Dec 28, 2023 1:35:26 GMT
1. It can be both.
2. Why claim that one cares for animals and then eat them?
3. We don't need to eat meat for the most part. Its just become another industrial complex. If one is an Eskimo say, they are limited to what is available and fish is a main source of sustenance. For Western humans when there are a myriad of choices, most human beans make the worst ones. 1. It can be, but why would it be? 2. For similar reasons that one can claim to care for family, friends, work colleagues and so forth and still join the military in times of war and kill enemy combatants. 3. Our species was eating meat long before there were any industrial complexes. It's one of the main reasons our species rose to dominance and we are both able to argue about it on the internet via computers or other technological devices. All semantics, phony care and being uncaring is the same thing regarding the contradictions of animals and then eating them.
Then the militant mindset is full of hypocrisy and psychopathy.
Our world should have evolved enough to not exploit it. It hasn't!
Dominance over each other you mean? Aren't human beans about control and power?
|
|