|
Post by movieliker on Jan 7, 2024 12:54:31 GMT
The US Senate does not have power over the State Supreme Courts. Yeah, they do. The 14th Amendment is in the federal constitution. The Federal government has supremacy over the states when it comes to the federal constitution. The 14th Amendment doesn't say the Senate has power over the State Supreme Courts.
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Jan 7, 2024 12:57:17 GMT
Yeah, they do. The 14th Amendment is in the federal constitution. The Federal government has supremacy over the states when it comes to the federal constitution. The 14th Amendment doesn't say the Senate has power over the State Supreme Courts. The Constitution says they do. Read the supremacy clause. The federal government has supremacy over the states. The federal government settled this issue via the senate.
|
|
|
Post by averagejoe2021 on Jan 7, 2024 12:58:16 GMT
The 14th Amendment doesn't say the Senate has power over the State Supreme Courts. The Constitution says they do. Read the supremacy clause. The federal government has supremacy over the states. The federal government settled this issue via the senate. No Jack...movie is right. States can ignore the Constitution according to Movie...lol.
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jan 7, 2024 13:03:00 GMT
The 14th Amendment doesn't say the Senate has power over the State Supreme Courts. The Constitution says they do. Read the supremacy clause. The federal government has supremacy over the states. The federal government settled this issue via the senate. That is wrong. "Federal courts enjoy the sole power to interpret the law, determine the constitutionality of the law, and apply it to individual cases."www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/our-government/the-judicial-branch/
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Jan 7, 2024 13:17:33 GMT
The Constitution says they do. Read the supremacy clause. The federal government has supremacy over the states. The federal government settled this issue via the senate. That is wrong. "Federal courts enjoy the sole power to interpret the law, determine the constitutionality of the law, and apply it to individual cases."www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/our-government/the-judicial-branch/Ok? Thanks for providing a link that backs up what I said. States do not have the right to overturn the federal government's rulings. The senate had the constitutional power to rule on insurrection, and they acquitted. The conflicting state ruling is therefore invalid.
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jan 7, 2024 13:24:08 GMT
Ok? Thanks for providing a link that backs up what I said. States do not have the right to overturn the federal government's rulings. The senate had the constitutional power to rule on insurrection, and they acquitted. The conflicting state ruling is therefore invalid. Where does that link say that?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2024 13:24:38 GMT
The Constitution says they do. Read the supremacy clause. The federal government has supremacy over the states. The federal government settled this issue via the senate. That is wrong. "Federal courts enjoy the sole power to interpret the law, determine the constitutionality of the law, and apply it to individual cases."www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/our-government/the-judicial-branch/This discussion is academic. SCOTUS will render a decision on this matter soon movieliker.
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jan 7, 2024 13:29:53 GMT
This discussion is academic. SCOTUS will render a decision on this matter soon movieliker. Jack Spicer, Average Joe and I have already agreed on that multiple times.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2024 13:33:02 GMT
This discussion is academic. SCOTUS will render a decision on this matter soon movieliker. Jack Spicer, Average Joe and I have already agreed on that multiple times. So maybe enough has been said? You will never agree that Trump should not be excluded from the ballot. No matter what. Right?
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jan 7, 2024 13:33:53 GMT
I'm not confused. And never have been. On the other hand, you've never understood. And still don't. I understand. You have been making your viewpoint clear for a while now movieliker. "Donald Trump incited an insurrection. He is an insurrectionist. A criminal. He should be excluded from the ballot due to the 14th Amendment." There is nothing anyone can say that will make you budge an inch from those absolute statements. Trying to debate you is a waste of time. Here is my position: "Donald Trump did not incite an insurrection. He is not an insurrectionist. There was no insurrection. He is not a criminal. He should be included on the ballot." SCOTUS will hear the case soon. They will decide if he can or cannot be excluded. I am cautiously optimistic that they will make the correct decision and allow voters to decide who will be the next President. MAGA What do you think of the people arrested and convicted for the Jan 6th attack? They were Antifa? They were members of a peaceful tour of the Capitol? They were Trump supporters who just went too far? What?
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jan 7, 2024 13:34:34 GMT
Jack Spicer, Average Joe and I have already agreed on that multiple times. So maybe enough has been said? You will never agree that Trump should not be excluded from the ballot. No matter what. Right? What do you think of the people arrested and convicted for the Jan 6th attack? They were Antifa? They were members of a peaceful tour of the Capitol? They were Trump supporters who just went too far? What?
|
|
|
Post by averagejoe2021 on Jan 7, 2024 13:44:05 GMT
So maybe enough has been said? You will never agree that Trump should not be excluded from the ballot. No matter what. Right? What do you think of the people arrested and convicted for the Jan 6th attack? They were Antifa? They were members of a peaceful tour of the Capitol? They were Trump supporters who just went too far? What? Jan 6th rioters??... try them and find them guilty of appropriate crimes. They ranged from simple trespasses (throw out charges) to threats (throw the book at them). Not Antifa Many were peaceful. But a significant portion were not. Some were Trump supporters...some were not. None of them were incited/ordered by Trump to enter or take over the capital.
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jan 7, 2024 13:53:27 GMT
What do you think of the people arrested and convicted for the Jan 6th attack? They were Antifa? They were members of a peaceful tour of the Capitol? They were Trump supporters who just went too far? What? Jan 6th rioters??... try them and find them guilty of appropriate crimes. They ranged from simple trespasses (throw out charges) to threats (throw the book at them). Not Antifa Many were peaceful. But a significant portion were not. Some were Trump supporters...some were not. None of them were incited/ordered by Trump to enter or take over the capital. They all said they were only doing what Trump told them to do.
|
|
|
Post by averagejoe2021 on Jan 7, 2024 13:55:47 GMT
Jan 6th rioters??... try them and find them guilty of appropriate crimes. They ranged from simple trespasses (throw out charges) to threats (throw the book at them). Not Antifa Many were peaceful. But a significant portion were not. Some were Trump supporters...some were not. None of them were incited/ordered by Trump to enter or take over the capital. They all said they were only doing what Trump told them to do. Where did he specifically say to enter and overthrow the capital? If he said that.. you have credibility. If he didn't.... then you don't. Simple as that. After all...you said those people were stupid morons. So..only stupid people would believe Trump said something he didn't....right?
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jan 7, 2024 13:59:14 GMT
They all said they were only doing what Trump told them to do. Where did he specifically say to enter and overthrow the capital? If he said that.. you have credibility. If he didn't.... then you don't. Simple as that. After all...you said those people were stupid morons. So..only stupid people would believe Trump said something he didn't....right? I never said he said it. I said the arrested attackers said he did.
|
|