|
|
Post by mikemonger on Jan 25, 2024 20:00:31 GMT
Fun Fact: Shares the same universe as the Alien franchise Apparently, ALIEN, BLADE RUNNER, PREDATOR and SOLDIER all share the same universe... What is your proof that FIREFLY does as well? I looked it up when I read that. Apparently you see the Weyland-Utani logo in there somewhere. |
|
|
|
Post by ant-mac on Jan 25, 2024 20:01:08 GMT
You found a bunch of fans here!!!!  The movie is in my iTunes movie library. It, along with the TV series, is in my DVD collection. |
|
|
|
Post by ant-mac on Jan 25, 2024 20:02:23 GMT
Apparently, ALIEN, BLADE RUNNER, PREDATOR and SOLDIER all share the same universe... What is your proof that FIREFLY does as well? I looked it up when I read that. Apparently you see the Weyland-Utani logo in there somewhere. Check the posts on the previous page and you'll see an image of it. :D |
|
|
|
Post by SciFive on Jan 25, 2024 20:10:46 GMT
You found a bunch of fans here!!!! The movie is in my iTunes movie library. It, along with the TV series, is in my DVD collection. I’ve got the tv series, too. :) In iTunes library for tv. |
|
|
|
Post by ant-mac on Jan 25, 2024 20:13:40 GMT
It, along with the TV series, is in my DVD collection. I’ve got the tv series, too. In iTunes library for tv. I'll stick to physical media... On the day I went looking for them, the TV series was on special in one shop and the film was on special in another shop. It was fate! :D |
|
|
|
Post by papamihel on Jan 25, 2024 20:25:10 GMT
Fun Fact: Shares the same universe as the Alien franchise Can't be. Earth is perfectly fine in the Aliens universe and humans didn't migrate to another system, they just spread around via interstellar travel |
|
|
|
Post by ant-mac on Jan 25, 2024 20:30:36 GMT
Fun Fact: Shares the same universe as the Alien franchise Can't be. Earth is perfectly fine in the Aliens universe and humans didn't migrate to another system, they just spread around via interstellar travel The events of ALIEN are set in 2122. The events of FIREFLY are set in 2517. So there are nearly 400 years between... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2024 20:37:41 GMT
Can't be. Earth is perfectly fine in the Aliens universe and humans didn't migrate to another system, they just spread around via interstellar travel The events of ALIEN are set in 2122. The events of FIREFLY are set in 2517. So there are nearly 400 years between... Weyland-Yutani had a good business strategy for its longevity ![[grin]](http://storage.proboards.com/6870873/images/CBubFSUbXfyoLMZUjeBb.gif) |
|
|
|
Post by ant-mac on Jan 25, 2024 20:39:50 GMT
The events of ALIEN are set in 2122. The events of FIREFLY are set in 2517. So there are nearly 400 years between... Weyland-Yutani had a good business strategy for its longevity Besides which, nothing looked particularly shiny or new in either ALIEN or FIREFLY. A lot of it simply looked patched together and make-do. |
|
|
|
Post by papamihel on Jan 25, 2024 20:42:37 GMT
Can't be. Earth is perfectly fine in the Aliens universe and humans didn't migrate to another system, they just spread around via interstellar travel The events of ALIEN are set in 2122. The events of FIREFLY are set in 2517. So there are nearly 400 years between... When you have easily available star flight, you don't need to huddle in one system. Also, there is no chance you'd use up all your resources since you have access to the infinite universe. The Old Earth doesn't need to sustain your numbers. |
|
|
|
Post by ant-mac on Jan 25, 2024 21:05:39 GMT
The events of ALIEN are set in 2122. The events of FIREFLY are set in 2517. So there are nearly 400 years between... When you have easily available star flight, you don't need to huddle in one system. Also, there is no chance you'd use up all your resources since you have access to the infinite universe. The Old Earth doesn't need to sustain your numbers. We're talking about a fictional universe. So it's possible that some sort of fictional event - or series of events - happened during the intervening centuries that changed matters. For me, it's a curious - but not a compelling - puzzle. |
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Jan 26, 2024 14:26:21 GMT
Why is it bad news you can't create porn again?
I was half joking, but let me tell you the other half, which is not a joke, but actually bad news. The fact that violent imagery and sexual content are not permitted creates unnecessary negation of perfectly normal, necessary creations due to how the search function works. For instance, the program does not want to generate naked body parts in general, however, naked body parts are necessary to create the right messaging for the world to consume in very specific situations and can lack sexuality entirely, thus, are legitimate types of content creation free of legal entanglement, thus, theoretically, you should be able to convince the AI to do it. My point was that the authority on the subject says, don't ask to generate content for a "naked shoulder," but rather to generate content of a "shoulder than has no clothing" and you can bypass some of the unnecessary parameters on the AI. Someone's shoulder isn't pornographic. AI images of Taylor Swift getting fucked at a football game are pornographic. |
|
|
|
Post by winterssuicide on Jan 26, 2024 14:31:41 GMT
I was half joking, but let me tell you the other half, which is not a joke, but actually bad news. The fact that violent imagery and sexual content are not permitted creates unnecessary negation of perfectly normal, necessary creations due to how the search function works. For instance, the program does not want to generate naked body parts in general, however, naked body parts are necessary to create the right messaging for the world to consume in very specific situations and can lack sexuality entirely, thus, are legitimate types of content creation free of legal entanglement, thus, theoretically, you should be able to convince the AI to do it. My point was that the authority on the subject says, don't ask to generate content for a "naked shoulder," but rather to generate content of a "shoulder than has no clothing" and you can bypass some of the unnecessary parameters on the AI. AI images of Taylor Swift are pornographic. was the jokey part. The reason you may struggle to prompt this AI to create an image of a woman's naked shoulder is because it doesn't want to create pornography. The algorithm rejects prompts like "naked" or "nude" regardless of context because...pornography. |
|
|
|
Post by DalekFred on Jan 26, 2024 14:41:45 GMT
Someone's shoulder isn't pornographic. AI images of Taylor Swift are pornographic. was the jokey part. The reason you may struggle to prompt this AI to create an image of a woman's naked shoulder is because it doesn't want to create pornography. The algorithm rejects prompts like "naked" or "nude" regardless of context because...pornography. Even the robots are trying to interfere with free expression! Get Elon in there to restrict it even more in the name of "freedom of speech!" |
|
|
|
Post by winterssuicide on Jan 26, 2024 14:56:01 GMT
That was the jokey part. The reason you may struggle to prompt this AI to create an image of a woman's naked shoulder is because it doesn't want to create pornography. The algorithm rejects prompts like "naked" or "nude" regardless of context because...pornography. Even the robots are trying to interfere with free expression! Get Elon in there to restrict it even more in the name of "freedom of speech!" Oh, it's not even the robots' fault! No, a species far less humane than and inferior to robots is to blame: lawyers. |
|
