|
Post by phludowin on Feb 28, 2024 23:02:15 GMT
Some couples probably do work better with a submissive domestic partner. Some don’t. Some try it and get divorced Takes all types. I wish people would just let each other be and give less intrusive fucks all the time. On the one hand, yes; on the other hand, there have been a few threads from the right-wing in the past weeks, about how supposedly happy people living the traditional role-model are; and how supposedly unhappy others are. So a reality check is in order.
|
|
|
Post by cinemachinery on Feb 28, 2024 23:17:49 GMT
Some couples probably do work better with a submissive domestic partner. Some don’t. Some try it and get divorced Takes all types. I wish people would just let each other be and give less intrusive fucks all the time. On the one hand, yes; on the other hand, there have been a few threads from the right-wing in the past weeks, about how supposedly happy people living the traditional role-model are; and how supposedly unhappy others are. So a reality check is in order. Well that’s just what I mean: the notion that some folks are gonna be happy that way isn’t surprising. The notion that some people want to dress up as furries on weekends and split their dick with a Prince Albert isn’t surprising. It’s people who go the “NO, HERE’S WHAT’S BEST YOU CHOADS” route that stymie me. Not saying your thread is doing this, but the internet-fostered team sports dynamic turns everythingup to butt-wiping into some weird partisan competition. Go wear your skirts, ladies. And gents.
|
|
|
Post by theBROKEdontrump on Feb 28, 2024 23:29:45 GMT
It doesn’t really matter if she works or not. Just keep your husband fed and fucked and keep your weight below 120 and your waist below 90cm.
Other than that, do what you want.
|
|
|
Post by San926f on Feb 29, 2024 0:11:25 GMT
On the one hand, yes; on the other hand, there have been a few threads from the right-wing in the past weeks, about how supposedly happy people living the traditional role-model are; and how supposedly unhappy others are. So a reality check is in order. Well that’s just what I mean: the notion that some folks are gonna be happy that way isn’t surprising. The notion that some people want to dress up as furries on weekends and split their dick with a Prince Albert isn’t surprising. It’s people who go the “NO, HERE’S WHAT’S BEST YOU CHOADS” route that stymie me. Not saying your thread is doing this, but the internet-fostered team sports dynamic turns everythingup to butt-wiping into some weird partisan competition. Go wear your skirts, ladies. And gents. Because there aren't any liberal good-wives that stay home with their kids, I guess? The internet is not a reflection of real life, and that's what's making everyone so damn screwy anymore.
|
|
|
Post by cinemachinery on Feb 29, 2024 0:39:01 GMT
Well that’s just what I mean: the notion that some folks are gonna be happy that way isn’t surprising. The notion that some people want to dress up as furries on weekends and split their dick with a Prince Albert isn’t surprising. It’s people who go the “NO, HERE’S WHAT’S BEST YOU CHOADS” route that stymie me. Not saying your thread is doing this, but the internet-fostered team sports dynamic turns everythingup to butt-wiping into some weird partisan competition. Go wear your skirts, ladies. And gents. Because there aren't any liberal good-wives that stay home with their kids, I guess? The internet is not a reflection of real life, and that's what's making everyone so damn screwy anymore. I mean PRECISELY… “Oh gosh look at this domestic arrangement where one is the breadwinner and the other runs the household almost entirely” is about as uncommon as an asshole. Slap an apron on it and call it new, I guess. People seem lap it up.
|
|
|
Post by PaulsLaugh on Feb 29, 2024 3:28:23 GMT
Well that’s just what I mean: the notion that some folks are gonna be happy that way isn’t surprising. The notion that some people want to dress up as furries on weekends and split their dick with a Prince Albert isn’t surprising. It’s people who go the “NO, HERE’S WHAT’S BEST YOU CHOADS” route that stymie me. Not saying your thread is doing this, but the internet-fostered team sports dynamic turns everythingup to butt-wiping into some weird partisan competition. Go wear your skirts, ladies. And gents. Because there aren't any liberal good-wives that stay home with their kids, I guess? The internet is not a reflection of real life, and that's what's making everyone so damn screwy anymore. That’s what all those tradwives, MAGA stay-at-home women working in DC say.
|
|
|
Post by PaulsLaugh on Feb 29, 2024 3:33:14 GMT
Because there aren't any liberal good-wives that stay home with their kids, I guess? The internet is not a reflection of real life, and that's what's making everyone so damn screwy anymore. I mean PRECISELY… “Oh gosh look at this domestic arrangement where one is the breadwinner and the other runs the household almost entirely” is about as uncommon as an asshole. Slap an apron on it and call it new, I guess. People seem lap it up. If the man head-of-the-home breadwinner gets laid-off, doesn’t the stay-at-home wife need to go to work? Funny word “breadwinner.” It implies something won in a game, rather than something to earn money so it can be bought.
|
|
|
Post by ayatollah on Feb 29, 2024 3:38:42 GMT
So, one divorce?
I'd like to see some hard data on divorce rates for tradwives vs all marriages.
My wife is 50% tradwife. She stays at home, but doesn't do housework.
|
|
|
Post by Rob801 on Feb 29, 2024 9:48:34 GMT
Some interesting points made beyond the Tate comparison, which I only partially see…. But 100% on board with the fact that there is this idea that all women were stay at home moms 50+ years ago and that simply wasn’t the case. Poor women had to work. Hell, we were slightly upper middle class in the late 60’s early 70’s and my mom still had to work (luckily for her since my parents divorced around 76’).
And the woman in the video being discussed has some weird looking fingers, plus three hour pb&j lol.
|
|