|
|
Post by blacktothefuture on Apr 12, 2024 22:57:23 GMT
đ This article is written in crayon. What journalism. Yeah that part is baloney but the fact remains there was no reason for the white house to contact snopes to change their rating and THEN GLOAT ABOUT IT. But the fact remains Snopes denied they were pressured. The claim in the subject line is the White House pressured Snopes to change their rating. |
|
|
|
Post by thekindercarebear on Apr 12, 2024 22:58:16 GMT
Yeah that part is baloney but the fact remains there was no reason for the white house to contact snopes to change their rating and THEN GLOAT ABOUT IT. But the fact remains Snopes denied they were pressured. The claim in the subject line is the White House pressured Snopes to change their rating. Sorry but those emails say otherwise thanks to the gloating. We'll just have to agree to disagree. |
|
|
|
Post by Factchecker3Point0 on Apr 13, 2024 0:03:54 GMT
â Snopes says it wasnât pressured.â So, is Snopes lying? If so, cite Joe Bidenâs direct quote saying he wanted to ban gas stoves. That would take time from his "Black kids are ruining primary and secondary education" crusade. |
|
|
|
Post by thekindercarebear on Apr 13, 2024 0:05:41 GMT
â Snopes says it wasnât pressured.â So, is Snopes lying? If so, cite Joe Bidenâs direct quote saying he wanted to ban gas stoves. That would take time from his "Black kids are ruining primary and secondary education" crusade. |
|
|
|
Post by thekindercarebear on Apr 13, 2024 0:13:53 GMT
â Snopes says it wasnât pressured.â So, is Snopes lying? If so, cite Joe Bidenâs direct quote saying he wanted to ban gas stoves. That would take time from his "Black kids are ruining primary and secondary education" crusade. you are a terrible factcheker. just saying. |
|
|
|
Post by PaulsLaugh on Apr 13, 2024 0:23:03 GMT
But the fact remains Snopes denied they were pressured. The claim in the subject line is the White House pressured Snopes to change their rating. Sorry but those emails say otherwise thanks to the gloating. We'll just have to agree to disagree. Where are the those emails? This could simple a matter of misconception brought on by disinformation and confirmation bias. You know, I coulda gone to an Ivy school had I applied myselfâŚand had rich parents. |
|
|
|
Post by dlancer on Apr 13, 2024 5:53:40 GMT
Seems like Bear is currently in his concern-trolling phase.
|
|
|
|
Post by San926f on Apr 13, 2024 6:06:02 GMT
Good to know Snopes is garbage. They always seemed biased, and now we know.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Apr 13, 2024 12:33:26 GMT
â Snopes says it wasnât pressured.â So, is Snopes lying? If so, cite Joe Bidenâs direct quote saying he wanted to ban gas stoves.
And this is how you lie to yourselves..........and wonder why others don't believe you.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Apr 13, 2024 12:34:28 GMT
But the fact remains Snopes denied they were pressured. The claim in the subject line is the White House pressured Snopes to change their rating. Sorry but those emails say otherwise thanks to the gloating. We'll just have to agree to disagree.
As if Snopes needed to be pressured, though. ![[shrug]](http://storage.proboards.com/6870873/images/GNdzQKpfkkHBBwUPdCiE.gif)
They've shown, like most of the media, they're in the bag for the Establishment.
|
|
|
|
Post by thekindercarebear on Apr 13, 2024 17:23:52 GMT
Sorry but those emails say otherwise thanks to the gloating. We'll just have to agree to disagree.
As if Snopes needed to be pressured, though.
They've shown, like most of the media, they're in the bag for the Establishment.
there's some weird skewing going on here.
i didn't say anything about what was done as much as the stupidity that there were internal emails - accessible thanks to the FOIA - alluding to such with gloating.
if you're going to do it. do it.
leaving a digital paper trail to pat yourself on the shoulder is just stupid.
funny how i am the bad guy here for posting this. i didn't make the CPSC spokesperson contact Snopes nor did I tell her to send the white house the message "âSent over tough letter to this writer yesterday when the initial claim was rated as âmixed."
some of you people are way too biased to see that such correspondence is just stupid.
|
|
|
|
Post by San926f on Apr 13, 2024 17:46:40 GMT
As if Snopes needed to be pressured, though.
They've shown, like most of the media, they're in the bag for the Establishment.
there's some weird skewing going on here.
i didn't say anything about what was done as much as the stupidity that there were internal emails - accessible thanks to the FOIA - alluding to such with gloating.
if you're going to do it. do it.
leaving a digital paper trail to pat yourself on the shoulder is just stupid.
funny how i am the bad guy here for posting this. i didn't make the CPSC spokesperson contact Snopes nor did I tell her to send the white house the message "âSent over tough letter to this writer yesterday when the initial claim was rated as âmixed."
some of you people are way too biased to see that such correspondence is just stupid.
Because the people who sent the FBI to censor Twitter are above pressuring Snopes I guess? The truth hurts, and the truth is everything is a fucking game with these people. No, Democrats aren't any better than Republicabs about it either. Welcome to DC. |
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Apr 14, 2024 1:44:03 GMT
As if Snopes needed to be pressured, though.
They've shown, like most of the media, they're in the bag for the Establishment.
there's some weird skewing going on here.
i didn't say anything about what was done as much as the stupidity that there were internal emails - accessible thanks to the FOIA - alluding to such with gloating.
if you're going to do it. do it.
leaving a digital paper trail to pat yourself on the shoulder is just stupid.
funny how i am the bad guy here for posting this. i didn't make the CPSC spokesperson contact Snopes nor did I tell her to send the white house the message "âSent over tough letter to this writer yesterday when the initial claim was rated as âmixed."
some of you people are way too biased to see that such correspondence is just stupid.
but you ARE the bad guy.
Get in line and follow the narrative. Otherwise.........
|
|
|
|
Post by thekindercarebear on Apr 14, 2024 1:49:05 GMT
there's some weird skewing going on here.
i didn't say anything about what was done as much as the stupidity that there were internal emails - accessible thanks to the FOIA - alluding to such with gloating.
if you're going to do it. do it.
leaving a digital paper trail to pat yourself on the shoulder is just stupid.
funny how i am the bad guy here for posting this. i didn't make the CPSC spokesperson contact Snopes nor did I tell her to send the white house the message "âSent over tough letter to this writer yesterday when the initial claim was rated as âmixed."
some of you people are way too biased to see that such correspondence is just stupid.
but you ARE the bad guy.
Get in line and follow the narrative. Otherwise.........
:D |
|
