|
Post by jeffersoncody on May 8, 2024 6:37:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on May 8, 2024 6:47:44 GMT
Which is completely unrelated to business records. It's pure election interference.
Her testimony was so irrelevant and prejudicial that this illegitimate case could be overturned for this reason alone, irrespective of their being no crime committed.
|
|
|
Post by jeffersoncody on May 8, 2024 6:54:09 GMT
|
|
|
Post by jeffersoncody on May 8, 2024 7:05:18 GMT
Which is completely unrelated to business records. It's pure election interference. Her testimony was so irrelevant and prejudicial that this illegitimate case could be overturned for this reason alone, irrespective of their being no crime committed. LOL, Fat Donnie Trump is a sleazy whoremongering old fart who pressurised a porn star into having "old man sex in the missionary position" with her while his pretty, former nude model foreign wife was pregnant with his * spawn. Trump is a laughing stock Jack, a national embarrassment. * Looking at young Barron and how tall he is, one has to wonder if James Comey was Barron's real baby daddy. What say you Jack?
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on May 8, 2024 7:34:15 GMT
Which is completely unrelated to business records. It's pure election interference. Her testimony was so irrelevant and prejudicial that this illegitimate case could be overturned for this reason alone, irrespective of their being no crime committed. LOL, Fat Donnie Trump is a sleazy whoremongering old fart who pressurised a porn star into having "old man sex in the missionary position" with her while his pretty, former nude model foreign wife was pregnant with his * spawn. Trump is a laughing stock Jack, a national embarrassment. * Looking at young Barron and how tall he is, one has to wonder if James Comey was Barron's real baby daddy. What say you Jack? How do any of these irrelevant details prove anything about the elements of the alleged non-crime? Her testimony yesterday was meant to damage Trump's reputation in the 2024 election, nothing more. This case is purely political.
|
|
|
Post by jeffersoncody on May 8, 2024 7:38:45 GMT
LOL, Fat Donnie Trump is a sleazy whoremongering old fart who pressurised a porn star into having "old man sex in the missionary position" with her while his pretty, former nude model foreign wife was pregnant with his * spawn. Trump is a laughing stock Jack, a national embarrassment. * Looking at young Barron and how tall he is, one has to wonder if James Comey was Barron's real baby daddy. What say you Jack? How do any of these irrelevant details prove anything about the elements of the alleged non-crime? Her testimony yesterday was meant to damage Trump's reputation in the 2024 election, nothing more. This case is purely political.
|
|
|
Post by merh on May 8, 2024 7:42:05 GMT
Which is completely unrelated to business records. It's pure election interference. Her testimony was so irrelevant and prejudicial that this illegitimate case could be overturned for this reason alone, irrespective of their being no crime committed. So the details of what he did with Daniels was damaging enough Trump DID need to hush it up? The spanking with the magazine is old news. It was known when all the details came out a few years back.
|
|
|
Post by merh on May 8, 2024 7:43:18 GMT
LOL, Fat Donnie Trump is a sleazy whoremongering old fart who pressurised a porn star into having "old man sex in the missionary position" with her while his pretty, former nude model foreign wife was pregnant with his * spawn. Trump is a laughing stock Jack, a national embarrassment. * Looking at young Barron and how tall he is, one has to wonder if James Comey was Barron's real baby daddy. What say you Jack? How do any of these irrelevant details prove anything about the elements of the alleged non-crime? Her testimony yesterday was meant to damage Trump's reputation in the 2024 election, nothing more. This case is purely political. Again, proving Trump needed to hide the details to further his political career. Maybe he shouldn't have cheated on his wives.
|
|
|
Post by Bud47 on May 8, 2024 7:43:39 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Orlando City Cat on May 8, 2024 7:49:23 GMT
If this were a Democrat, the politicos and media would say, “It’s just about sex.” Where have we heard that before?
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on May 8, 2024 9:01:10 GMT
How do any of these irrelevant details prove anything about the elements of the alleged non-crime? Her testimony yesterday was meant to damage Trump's reputation in the 2024 election, nothing more. This case is purely political. Again, proving Trump needed to hide the details to further his political career. Maybe he shouldn't have cheated on his wives. No, it doesn't prove that. Hope Hicks already testified that Trump was concerned about what Melania would think.
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on May 8, 2024 9:07:49 GMT
Maybe he shouldn't have cheated on his wives.
So where are the charges and investigations over every single politician that used that slush fund to pay others off?
|
|
|
Post by merh on May 8, 2024 9:18:33 GMT
Again, proving Trump needed to hide the details to further his political career. Maybe he shouldn't have cheated on his wives. No, it doesn't prove that. Hope Hicks already testified that Trump was concerned about what Melania would think. While several others have said Melania was not mentioned as the reason. Only his worry of how it would damage his political career after the other tape came out. He certainly had no problem cheating on any of his wives.
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on May 8, 2024 9:21:40 GMT
No, it doesn't prove that. Hope Hicks already testified that Trump was concerned about what Melania would think. While several others have said Melania was not mentioned as the reason. Only his worry of how it would damage his political career after the other tape came out. He certainly had no problem cheating on any of his wives. Who said that?
|
|
|
Post by merh on May 8, 2024 9:41:33 GMT
Maybe he shouldn't have cheated on his wives.
So where are the charges and investigations over every single politician that used that slush fund to pay others off?
Did they try to write it off on their taxes as a business expense? We have had our share of local politician scandals, dude. 35th Mayor of San Diego December 3, 2012 – August 30, 2013 U.S. House of Representatives January 3, 1993 – December 3, 2012 Ranking Member of the House Veterans' Affairs Committee January 3, 2011 – December 3, 2012 Chair of the House Veterans' Affairs Committee January 4, 2007 – January 3, 2011 San Diego City Council December 1987 – January 3, 1993 So career politician. Lasted less than a year as Mayor & was convicted for his actions by a court.
|
|