|
Post by CheetahCandyCorn on Jun 25, 2024 19:15:22 GMT
I hear Drac is a HUGE BOND FAN! I'm a huge CheetahCandyCorn fan and hope you join us. Thank you, but I don't do horror
|
|
Movie Night
Elliot Carver
__MOVIE NIGHT_ _____XXXIII____ _SAT NOV 2 2024_ ____7pm EDT ___ ____4pm PDT____ MOVIENIGHT.SITE
Posts: 455
|
Post by Movie Night on Jun 25, 2024 19:19:54 GMT
Movie Night XXIX start times from 7pm EDT Sat Jul 6 2024: The Other Side of the Door (2016)
| 7:00 | Free Guy (2021) | 8:36 | Very Bad Things (1998) | 10:31 | TBD | 12:11 | TBD | | TBD |
|
|
|
|
Post by hugsfromlv426 on Jun 25, 2024 19:27:40 GMT
Thank you, but I don't do horror You can join us for movies 2 and 3.
|
|
|
Post by Dracula on Jun 25, 2024 19:39:48 GMT
Thank you, but I don't do horror That's what she said...
|
|
|
Post by Foxy on Jun 25, 2024 20:05:26 GMT
Oh wow, I think this is the first time a nomination of mine made it through!
I enjoy this movie, and it’s not on any free to me streaming platforms, so I nominated it. Has some jump scares, which I hate. But a cool premise.
|
|
|
Post by Foxy on Jun 25, 2024 20:06:36 GMT
Thank you, but I don't do horror It’s not a “horror” horror movie. Some blood, but mostly a psychological film.
|
|
|
Post by Dracula on Jun 25, 2024 20:32:09 GMT
Thank you, but I don't do horror It’s not a “horror” horror movie. Some blood, but mostly a psychological film. That's exactly the feeling I got from it based on the trailer, that it wasn't so physically scary but rather one of them "psychological" deals where we gotta imagine the glorious blood and gore and CGI that wasn't in the budget.
|
|
|
Post by hugsfromlv426 on Jun 25, 2024 21:13:03 GMT
It’s not a “horror” horror movie. Some blood, but mostly a psychological film. That's exactly the feeling I got from it based on the trailer, that it wasn't so physically scary but rather one of them "psychological" deals where we gotta imagine the glorious blood and gore and CGI that wasn't in the budget. WTF? If I wanted to imagine the gore I would read a book.
|
|
|
Post by jimmywynn on Jun 25, 2024 21:16:27 GMT
That's exactly the feeling I got from it based on the trailer, that it wasn't so physically scary but rather one of them "psychological" deals where we gotta imagine the glorious blood and gore and CGI that wasn't in the budget. WTF? If I wanted to imagine the gore I would read a book. I recommend "An Inconvenient Truth"
|
|
|
Post by merh on Jun 26, 2024 3:28:38 GMT
That's exactly the feeling I got from it based on the trailer, that it wasn't so physically scary but rather one of them "psychological" deals where we gotta imagine the glorious blood and gore and CGI that wasn't in the budget. WTF? If I wanted to imagine the gore I would read a book. Never heard the Hammer Horror Dracula story? There is an old joke that Hammer would do 3 versions of a film. The British version was very mild, the American had more blood added, & Japan, it would be released in time for school holiday. So they released a Dracula sequel(I forget which one) & the press interviews a fan at the opening who goes.on about how cool it was in the beginning where they slit the victim open & all the blood & guts flowed out-which wasn't shown in the film & defeated the purpose of the preview review to sell the film to the British audience. The interviewed fan imagined how much blood was in the opening scene, but the studio was trying to fight the excessive gore image.
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Jun 26, 2024 9:20:04 GMT
WTF? If I wanted to imagine the gore I would read a book. Never heard the Hammer Horror Dracula story? There is an old joke that Hammer would do 3 versions of a film. The British version was very mild, the American had more blood added, & Japan, it would be released in time for school holiday. So they released a Dracula sequel(I forget which one) & the press interviews a fan at the opening who goes.on about how cool it was in the beginning where they slit the victim open & all the blood & guts flowed out-which wasn't shown in the film & defeated the purpose of the preview review to sell the film to the British audience. The interviewed fan imagined how much blood was in the opening scene, but the studio was trying to fight the excessive gore image. That's Dracula Prince of Darkness and you do see the blood spill out - it's when his servant hoists one of the castle's guests up by a rope over Dracula's ashes and cuts him open to resurrect him. Saw it in the 70s.
|
|
|
Post by merh on Jun 26, 2024 9:26:13 GMT
Never heard the Hammer Horror Dracula story? There is an old joke that Hammer would do 3 versions of a film. The British version was very mild, the American had more blood added, & Japan, it would be released in time for school holiday. So they released a Dracula sequel(I forget which one) & the press interviews a fan at the opening who goes.on about how cool it was in the beginning where they slit the victim open & all the blood & guts flowed out-which wasn't shown in the film & defeated the purpose of the preview review to sell the film to the British audience. The interviewed fan imagined how much blood was in the opening scene, but the studio was trying to fight the excessive gore image. That's Dracula Prince of Darkness and you do see the blood spill out - it's when his servant hoists one of the castle's guests up by a rope over Dracula's ashes and cuts him open to resurrect him. Saw it in the 70s. I had several collections on horror in the 70s There was concern about violence in movies/tv then(Wild wild West was cancelled at the height of its ratings in the name of reducing violence on tv). So the Hammer Studios was trying to assuage people's fear with this PR thing, only the audience mmber went overboard, adding far more to the scene than the actual special effects. He didn't relate how tastefully the studio felt they managed the scene.
|
|