maga is being pretty quiet about presidential immunity

You know what he was convicted of. He is saying that was a presidential act.

maga is mum, of course.

Are you ready for presidents to have such wide ranging immunity? Or do you just assume there will never be another democratic president so the end justifies the means?

They were saying on TV that Trump's logic is because he involved Michael Cohen in the cover up ( or whatever they are calling it) while he was POTUS that it makes it all fall under the Presidential duties umbrella.

Ahh but your prior examples were not presidential which was your OP. So why blame me for your inability to cite examples?

There are tons of motions he can file. But if the flimsy (as even most on the left agree) state case NY doesn't constitute any argument of presidential immunity...which I don't believe it does... then it won't stop any sentencing in the end. So do you care abot a delay in justice?... or do you hate that it won't prevent him from potentially winning? That was a rhetorical question. 

No....that's not the definition of fixing an election. Fixing an election is when you directly and illegally mess with the results. Hush money for an alleged act does not confirm the act, isn't illegal, and doesn't rig an election.

I have. The Georgia case is self-serving but still within his rights to challenge the votes in a state that had a far lower voided vote total despite having a significantly higher volume.

I am not rationalizing anything. I am asking you to prove your claim. I have long since conceded he is a liar, vindictive, petty, thin-skinned, immoral in regard to his marriages AND business dealings, etc. Yet despite that, he's been a better president than anything the Dems have produced in half a century. I know to you....your irrational emotion trumps any need to prove a point. But rational adults need actual proof. And I fully admit the TDS kids refer to anyone requiring proof is a cult member despite the fact the TDS crowd exhibits said qualities in far greater frequency and volume. Anything else or do you want to shameless bump your cult thread again to cope with your increasingly likely (and well -deserved) loss? 

Yeah and when they say " I know he's old/bad/etc but he's a million time better than Trump!" Like..WTF do they dream up that metric when the numbers refute them? Its like arguing with kids.

They're too busy watching the Dem party collapse and libs having total meltdowns.

That's why it was linked to the bookkeeping issue of claiming the money paid to Cohen was for legal services when it was paying him back for the money he paid to keep the women quiet.

Apparently it was because the other audio caused a ripple in the approval they worried him bopping other women while the wife was preggers  might upset female voters.

But then Cheapass Trump didn't want to pay until after the election because if he lost, it didn't matter.