Pete Hegseth accused of sexual assault in 2017 probe

And its fine to categorise "trans" anyway you see, fit, but the rest of the population isn't defined by them. That would rapidly become nonsensical. For example. I have blue eyes, thus I define all men without blues eyes as "normalis" and people with less common eye colours as "speciali" So now I am a Cis, Speciali male. But I'm also white, most humans are not, so I will define all non white humans as "humano" and white humans as "Europa"

This now means that I am a Cis, speciali, Europa male and Denzel WAshington is a Cis, normalis, humano male. Do you see how stupid and pointless this is?

The numbers in the UK in 2010 were roughly equal. Now, in young people it is about 70% girls.


I don't care why trans people are over represented in sex work, it isn't relevant to the point made. The claim that trans women are more likley to be victim of sexual assault than women or girls is a misrepresentation of reality. In the same way that including male victims of prison rape in rape stats would make men more at risk than women. 

And no, it isn't a myth, literally all the studies ever done confirm this. The simple truth of this is that hormone influence behaviour and brain development and males and females do not carry the same levels, even high testosterone females do not approach males levels. The idea that we invented this to reinforce stereotypes is a nonsense that ignores the biological reality of what our species is and our evolutionary history. 

We are social mammals, specifically Great Apes. All the great apes show sex specific behaviour. All mammals show sex specific behaviour and not one person who argues in favour of social constructionism can explain why H.Sapien is the exception to this rule. 

Mate selection in humans is done by females. Infants humans are extremely vulnerable and pregnant women are also vulnerable and compromised in their ability to provide for themselves. Thus they require a competent male to protect and provide for them. This creates a sexual selective pressure on males for competence, assertiveness and aggression, since they have to compete with other males and must demonstrate those traits to females to be considered for selection. 

Thus after 250,000 or so years, we observe a greater tendency for aggression, technical competence and assertiveness in males than females, because no selective pressure existed on females to develop these traits. The problem is that this is viewed by left wing feminists as some kind of value judgement, because they fail to recognise what I said, that these things are descriptive, not prescriptive. 

The definition of "heterosexual" isn't "not gay" Thats the point. "Cis" only exists to make an arbitrary distinction, as I just demonstrated. 

And no, we haven't one every study, obviously, but all the ones we have done show the same conclusion. At some point denying the conclusions is just denying reality.
And what research do you think is going to conclude that Ape males and female are exactly the same in all aspects? We know they are not, so what point do you think you are making here? Do you think breaking new research will show we are not placental mammals whos survival depends no the mother infant bond?

yes, gender is a social construct and all social constructs are attempts by humans to understand and control reality. As I said, what we deem "masculine" is simply that way because we have observed it. Our gendered behaviour and gender roles very closely mirror our nearest relatives, so on what basis are we concluding that in humans its socially constructed, but not in other animals?


And no it isn't, since you brought up trans victims as a rebuttal in itself. Trans women are massively over represented as sex offenders in UK prison stats and the Swedish Study shows trans women retain male offending rates. 

Yes. Did you have a point to make?

the Box-O-Wine is empty you old bag of poop, go to bed