|
|
Post by gwyn on Nov 22, 2024 5:10:09 GMT
Oh my goodness, pretty lady. You’ve got the reporting bug lately, but bad. Seems like when something gets to you, that’s your reaction, so you can use that knowledge to better deal with what’s upsetting. In other words, your urge to report is pointing you at some unresolved upset of your own. He definitely did not encourage suicide by suggesting that writing a suicide note to oneself is a good way to deal with those feelings without encouraging those feelings in others. Agree to disagree. I read an OP that with hopeless overtones, at best expressing a passive deathwish, and then dickhead comes in insulting her and telling her to go through with it. That kind of shit will get reported by me every time, and as I said, no exceptions. It's uncalled for to make such a dickish post to someone who is obviously in a bad place. What if Foxy really was suicidal? All he had to do was shut his yap if he had nothing constructive to add. I don't report often. I think in the years I was on V2 it was only like, 3 times? And as I've said before, my report history is no secret. It's my policy to tell someone right then and there I did it and why. I will admit I AM touchy about this kind of stuff. I've lost patients to suicide after they were discharged. They are okay for awhile, but then something happens and they end up in the obituary and word gets around the hospital that they completed an attempt before they could get back to the hospital. It's heartbreaking. So, no patience for the "just do it and shut up" fucks and their posts. No. Agree to disagree cannot be followed by an objectively dishonest statement. That is not how “agree to disagree” is used. That is really disgusting. I would never stand by and Okay someone lying about another poster’s plain to read, black and white posts. You don’t get to maliciously smear Lux and lie about his writing. That’s nuts. “Telling her to go through with it”? Grotesque lie. I was prepared to answer “Sure” to this pablum and walk away. You’ve really lost the thread. Jfc. |
|
|
|
Post by San926f on Nov 22, 2024 5:14:13 GMT
Agree to disagree. I read an OP that with hopeless overtones, at best expressing a passive deathwish, and then dickhead comes in insulting her and telling her to go through with it. That kind of shit will get reported by me every time, and as I said, no exceptions. It's uncalled for to make such a dickish post to someone who is obviously in a bad place. What if Foxy really was suicidal? All he had to do was shut his yap if he had nothing constructive to add. I don't report often. I think in the years I was on V2 it was only like, 3 times? And as I've said before, my report history is no secret. It's my policy to tell someone right then and there I did it and why. I will admit I AM touchy about this kind of stuff. I've lost patients to suicide after they were discharged. They are okay for awhile, but then something happens and they end up in the obituary and word gets around the hospital that they completed an attempt before they could get back to the hospital. It's heartbreaking. So, no patience for the "just do it and shut up" fucks and their posts. No. Agree to disagree cannot be followed by an objectively dishonest statement. That is not how “agree to disagree” is used. That is really disgusting. I would never stand by and Okay someone lying about another poster’s plain to read, black and white posts. You don’t get to maliciously smear Lux and lie about his writing. That’s nuts. “Telling her to go through with it”? Grotesque lie. I was prepared to answer “Sure” to this pablum and walk away. You’ve really lost the thread. Jfc. You read the same post I did. I'm not lying about what he posted. I don't have to smear Lux, he does it himself perfectly fine. |
|
|
|
Post by bartlesby on Nov 22, 2024 5:16:03 GMT
Agree to disagree. I read an OP that with hopeless overtones, at best expressing a passive deathwish, and then dickhead comes in insulting her and telling her to go through with it. That kind of shit will get reported by me every time, and as I said, no exceptions. It's uncalled for to make such a dickish post to someone who is obviously in a bad place. What if Foxy really was suicidal? All he had to do was shut his yap if he had nothing constructive to add. I don't report often. I think in the years I was on V2 it was only like, 3 times? And as I've said before, my report history is no secret. It's my policy to tell someone right then and there I did it and why. I will admit I AM touchy about this kind of stuff. I've lost patients to suicide after they were discharged. They are okay for awhile, but then something happens and they end up in the obituary and word gets around the hospital that they completed an attempt before they could get back to the hospital. It's heartbreaking. So, no patience for the "just do it and shut up" fucks and their posts. No. Agree to disagree cannot be followed by an objectively dishonest statement. That is not how “agree to disagree” is used. That is really disgusting. I would never stand by and Okay someone lying about another poster’s plain to read, black and white posts. You don’t get to maliciously smear Lux and lie about his writing. That’s nuts. “Telling her to go through with it”? Grotesque lie. I was prepared to answer “Sure” to this pablum and walk away. You’ve really lost the thread. Jfc. What's the malicious smear? I witnessed the schemie fook belch out "piss or get off the pot" when it came to suicide. |
|
|
|
Post by Foxy on Nov 22, 2024 5:36:15 GMT
Not everything comes down to in/not in tribe, Dem or GOP/MAGA, red or blue. And if you don’t know that I always try to ensure I’m not dogpiling/ganging up on others, well now you do. Precisely. You must know your Twitter temp ban has nothing to do with Elon BAD. And what kind of Gotcha is pointing out that Musk departs from Free Speech when it comes to protecting children from messages which tell them an adult would tell her teen self to suicide? That’s a pretty great departure from Free Speech absolutism, if you ask me. I would love to give Musk credit for it but - as dk65 has already pointed out - I can guarantee you Twitter always banned for such actions, probably not so short-term is the only difference. What on earth does “Elon BAD” have to do with tribes? He promised to be a free speech absolutist, then he turns around and bans people for speech he doesn’t like. If this was an isolated incident I’d surely chalk it off. But it isn’t. I keep seeing him, more and more, banning/suspending accounts he deems unsuitable, for speech he disapproves of. And if he doesn’t ban/suspend, he changes the algorithm strottling (is that a word?) tweeter’s posts. “Please let me know if you see this, as I’m getting way less traffic than I used to” tweets are the norm nowadays. It’s his site, he can do whatever the fuck he wants to with it. But don’t go spewing about being a free speech absolutist when he clearly isn’t. THAT’S my issue. |
|
|
|
Post by gwyn on Nov 22, 2024 5:40:23 GMT
Precisely. You must know your Twitter temp ban has nothing to do with Elon BAD. And what kind of Gotcha is pointing out that Musk departs from Free Speech when it comes to protecting children from messages which tell them an adult would tell her teen self to suicide? That’s a pretty great departure from Free Speech absolutism, if you ask me. I would love to give Musk credit for it but - as dk65 has already pointed out - I can guarantee you Twitter always banned for such actions, probably not so short-term is the only difference. What on earth does “Elon BAD” have to do with tribes? He promised to be a free speech absolutist, then he turns around and bans people for speech he doesn’t like. If this was an isolated incident I’d surely chalk it off. But it isn’t. I keep seeing him, more and more, banning/suspending accounts he deems unsuitable, for speech he disapproves of. And if he doesn’t ban/suspend, he changes the algorithm strottling (is that a word?) tweeter’s posts. “Please let me know if you see this, as I’m getting way less traffic than I used to” tweets are the norm nowadays. It’s his site, he can do whatever the fuck he wants to with it. But don’t go spewing about being a free speech absolutist when he clearly isn’t. THAT’S my issue. He never promised anyone he would allow you to tell teenagers to kill themselves which is what you did by saying you would tell your teen self to suicide. |
|
|
|
Post by dlancer on Nov 22, 2024 5:49:42 GMT
Precisely. You must know your Twitter temp ban has nothing to do with Elon BAD. And what kind of Gotcha is pointing out that Musk departs from Free Speech when it comes to protecting children from messages which tell them an adult would tell her teen self to suicide? That’s a pretty great departure from Free Speech absolutism, if you ask me. I would love to give Musk credit for it but - as dk65 has already pointed out - I can guarantee you Twitter always banned for such actions, probably not so short-term is the only difference. What on earth does “Elon BAD” have to do with tribes? He promised to be a free speech absolutist, then he turns around and bans people for speech he doesn’t like. If this was an isolated incident I’d surely chalk it off. But it isn’t. I keep seeing him, more and more, banning/suspending accounts he deems unsuitable, for speech he disapproves of. And if he doesn’t ban/suspend, he changes the algorithm strottling (is that a word?) tweeter’s posts. “Please let me know if you see this, as I’m getting way less traffic than I used to” tweets are the norm nowadays. It’s his site, he can do whatever the fuck he wants to with it. But don’t go spewing about being a free speech absolutist when he clearly isn’t. THAT’S my issue. Twitter certainly had its share of misinformation before Elon.
But after Elon, misinformation is it's main purpose.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dracula on Nov 22, 2024 5:59:23 GMT
If I wanna tell my 15-year-old self something, I'm gonna do it whether Elon Musk likes it or not. He can lock me out of Twitter but he can't lock me out of the DeLorean.
|
|
|
|
Post by Foxy on Nov 22, 2024 6:01:07 GMT
What on earth does “Elon BAD” have to do with tribes? He promised to be a free speech absolutist, then he turns around and bans people for speech he doesn’t like. If this was an isolated incident I’d surely chalk it off. But it isn’t. I keep seeing him, more and more, banning/suspending accounts he deems unsuitable, for speech he disapproves of. And if he doesn’t ban/suspend, he changes the algorithm strottling (is that a word?) tweeter’s posts. “Please let me know if you see this, as I’m getting way less traffic than I used to” tweets are the norm nowadays. It’s his site, he can do whatever the fuck he wants to with it. But don’t go spewing about being a free speech absolutist when he clearly isn’t. THAT’S my issue. He never promised anyone he would allow you to tell teenagers to kill themselves which is what you did by saying you would tell your teen self to suicide. Oh FFS. 🙄 |
|
|
|
Post by gwyn on Nov 22, 2024 6:21:11 GMT
He never promised anyone he would allow you to tell teenagers to kill themselves which is what you did by saying you would tell your teen self to suicide. Oh FFS. 🙄 You are in your 50s. Children are on Twitter. Your victim mentality aside, the world does not revolve around you. You are a threat to teens when you self-indulge so egregiously as to post on Twitter that you would tell your teen self to suicide. That this needs to be explained and re-explained to you in this thread speaks to a distortion in your worldview that is frankly doing you no favors. Now you might once again falsely post that I hate you. Victim mentality. |
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Nov 22, 2024 6:36:17 GMT
I have stupid British humour so always err on the side of that than thinking I mean it! Ah! But, you also have stupid British sense of alcohol moderation. So, perfectly in the realm of possibility you might ban "as a joke" and then completely forget you did so. I've seen people lose teeth while (British) drunken joking around. LOL!
(The takeaway here is: even if there is laughter, *never* tease a Brit soldier about Faulklands)
Nah, I take bans very seriously and would never do it as a joke. |
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Nov 22, 2024 6:52:21 GMT
You're posing a threat to emotionally unstable cretins use Twitter that's the point they lack comprehension and are reactionary that's why Twitter banned you. Einstein. 100% this The lack of understanding outside of your replies is shocking. Perhaps if you had opened without use of “fucking twat” 😂 you might have been a better source of much needed learning on here. You have no responsibility to be a teacher here and I love the gruff but you could actually do a lot of good with a pinch less of it. Again, it is not your job here to teach and posting should be what you want it to be. Was just a thought. Foxy is a twat but that wasn't in the original comment. At the end of the day it was Foxy that got banned on Twitter for encouraging suicide no one else. Should report her OP to Proboards for repeating her banned Twitter garbage on this board too but will think about it. |
|
|
|
Post by Nightman on Nov 22, 2024 6:55:33 GMT
He never promised anyone he would allow you to tell teenagers to kill themselves which is what you did by saying you would tell your teen self to suicide. ... That logic is so insane it's impressive. 🤔 |
|
|
|
Post by gwyn on Nov 22, 2024 7:35:18 GMT
100% this The lack of understanding outside of your replies is shocking. Perhaps if you had opened without use of “fucking twat” 😂 you might have been a better source of much needed learning on here. You have no responsibility to be a teacher here and I love the gruff but you could actually do a lot of good with a pinch less of it. Again, it is not your job here to teach and posting should be what you want it to be. Was just a thought. Foxy is a twat but that wasn't in the original comment. At the end of the day it was Foxy that got banned on Twitter for encouraging suicide no one else. Should report her OP to Proboards for repeating her banned Twitter garbage on this board too but will think about it. I don’t know, man. I never knew from “echo chamber” until the *whole* of the remaining v2 crowd came here. I understand wanting attention & what feels like love and approval, but knowing what she did wrong sufficiently to outline it in her I DID NOTHING WRONG thread, and only wanting to hear from people who will wallow around with her in her shared denial of the plain and simple reality she herself told us about is not healthy. I will not participate in that. I’m a fan of reality. I’m also a very compassionate person who knows lying to someone to make them feel better is not kindness. Oh my god. She’s Queen Anne in The Favourite!! 🤦♀️ Don’t report her. It won’t help anything, in my opinion. |
|
|
|
Post by gwyn on Nov 22, 2024 7:50:45 GMT
Yeah that was a stupid thing to say on a platform that's full of mentally and emotionally unstable young people who are easily influenced/triggered by everything they read online. ☝️☝️☝️found another one making sense |
|
|
|
Post by gwyn on Nov 22, 2024 7:58:50 GMT
Precisely. You must know your Twitter temp ban has nothing to do with Elon BAD. And what kind of Gotcha is pointing out that Musk departs from Free Speech when it comes to protecting children from messages which tell them an adult would tell her teen self to suicide? That’s a pretty great departure from Free Speech absolutism, if you ask me. I would love to give Musk credit for it but - as dk65 has already pointed out - I can guarantee you Twitter always banned for such actions, probably not so short-term is the only difference. What on earth does “Elon BAD” have to do with tribes? He promised to be a free speech absolutist, then he turns around and bans people for speech he doesn’t like. If this was an isolated incident I’d surely chalk it off. But it isn’t. I keep seeing him, more and more, banning/suspending accounts he deems unsuitable, for speech he disapproves of. And if he doesn’t ban/suspend, he changes the algorithm strottling (is that a word?) tweeter’s posts. “Please let me know if you see this, as I’m getting way less traffic than I used to” tweets are the norm nowadays. It’s his site, he can do whatever the fuck he wants to with it. But don’t go spewing about being a free speech absolutist when he clearly isn’t. THAT’S my issue. Again, it’s nothing to do with speech he doesn’t like. It’s what is a threat to the safety of Twitter users. This post reads like paranoia. You know X has an extensive staff, right? It appears you imagine Musk personally banned you… and other bonkers misinterpretations of reality. |
|
