|
Post by merh on Aug 6, 2025 20:25:04 GMT
It is fact it was missing, however they restored it. The article is not lying to you about something that never happened, it reported a fact. Elon & his little coders?
|
|
|
Post by darkramj on Aug 6, 2025 20:26:12 GMT
It is fact it was missing, however they restored it. The article is not lying to you about something that never happened, it reported a fact. Elon & his little coders? A vindictive Biden hold over?
|
|
|
Post by PaulsLaugh on Aug 6, 2025 20:26:28 GMT
It is fact it was missing, however they restored it. The article is not lying to you about something that never happened, it reported a fact. Oh, so it was just YOU who lied about the reason it was missing temporarily.Now that it's reportedly back, will you breathe a sigh of relief that the police state is over? I didn't think so, you'll just find the next bullshit sign you can fear-monger with. I didn’t lie about it, you miserable, illiterate child. The article said it was missing and indeed it was. Anyone with eyes to read and a mind to think understands that. The article clearly states: As of today, Articles I, Sections 9 and 10 remain inaccessible on Constitution.Congress.gov. It was published four hours ago and the National Archives tweeted they had fix it about four hours ago. Do you think the only comment I made, meant as satire, is a lie too? Nope, not a police state, no-no.
|
|
|
Post by darkramj on Aug 6, 2025 20:27:59 GMT
Oh, so it was just YOU who lied about the reason it was missing temporarily.Now that it's reportedly back, will you breathe a sigh of relief that the police state is over? I didn't think so, you'll just find the next bullshit sign you can fear-monger with. I didn’t lie about it, you miserable, illiterate child. The article said it was missing and indeed it was. Anyone with eyes to read and a mind to think understands that. The article clearly states: As of today, Articles I, Sections 9 and 10 remain inaccessible on Constitution.Congress.gov. It was published four hours ago and the National Archives tweeted they had fix it about four hours ago. Do you think the only comment I made, meant as satire, is a lie too? Nope, not a police state, no-no. I think you call it satire now that it proved to be nothing you called it before then.
|
|
|
Post by merh on Aug 6, 2025 20:29:34 GMT
Oh yeah that's totally the same thing. 🤦♂️ Sis sent me a bit on it. My link goes to the Internet Archive Wayback Machine. Dont believe that's the same as Paul's link. The text was there June 1, but gone today. Its the Congressional website where this occurred
|
|
|
Post by PaulsLaugh on Aug 6, 2025 20:31:07 GMT
Whether it was an error is true or not, it is not a lie the text of those two parts of Constitution were missing. They even acknowledged the possibility…and the irony. The disappearance of these sections from an official government resource—whether the result of an error or an intentional act—raises serious transparency concerns. The serious concerns you raised about a public health crisis that must have occurred when the Obamacare website crashed? Tens of millions of people were relying on that for their lives!! Who knows how many people DIED while it was down!!!??? Hypocrite. I did not write the article, son, so whatever you think about it that is hypocritical about it, you tell it the author Aaron Parnas. Here’s his X feed. You can’t deny the irony, even so. You’re worse an hypocrite, because a hypocrite can learn how to stop being one. There is no hope for you.
|
|
|
Post by darkramj on Aug 6, 2025 20:33:31 GMT
The serious concerns you raised about a public health crisis that must have occurred when the Obamacare website crashed? Tens of millions of people were relying on that for their lives!! Who knows how many people DIED while it was down!!!??? Hypocrite. I did not write the article, son, so whatever you think about it that is hypocritical about it, you tell it the author Aaron Parnas. Here’s his X feed. You can’t deny the irony, even so. You’re worse an hypocrite, because a hypocrite can learn how to stop being one. There is no hope for you. You did write the conclusion you now call satire. Here's a tip, when you say things you wholeheartedly believe are happening, it's not satire.
|
|
|
Post by PaulsLaugh on Aug 6, 2025 20:34:13 GMT
It is fact it was missing, however they restored it. The article is not lying to you about something that never happened, it reported a fact. Elon & his little coders? I daresay.
|
|
|
Post by PaulsLaugh on Aug 6, 2025 20:35:55 GMT
I did not write the article, son, so whatever you think about it that is hypocritical about it, you tell it the author Aaron Parnas. Here’s his X feed. You can’t deny the irony, even so. You’re worse an hypocrite, because a hypocrite can learn how to stop being one. There is no hope for you. You did write the conclusion you now call satire.Here's a tip, when you say things you wholeheartedly believe are happening, it's not satire. You mean the punchline? If you don’t think it was funny, I understand. Humor is subjective. And I don’t need to believe in something that has proof that it is a fact. That the sections were missing from the government website is true. The how and why, I made no comment on. The humor is based on the fact that the missing sections are specifically about your civil right for due process. The Constitution protects you too, little man. Stop chasing me like an angry, yappy little dog.
|
|
|
Post by N🧐bbi on Aug 6, 2025 20:43:46 GMT
That part of the constitution does not become invalid just bc it vanishes from the (https://constitution.congress.gov) website.
Changing the constitution has to be a complex bureaucratic act, not some few kByte on a gov website switching.
But.
But this was not a "coding error". Errors like these do not behave like this. This was a deliberate action. This was testing the waters regarding media reaction.
|
|
|
Post by merh on Aug 6, 2025 21:03:40 GMT
|
|
|
Post by darkramj on Aug 7, 2025 11:57:01 GMT
You did write the conclusion you now call satire.Here's a tip, when you say things you wholeheartedly believe are happening, it's not satire. You mean the punchline? If you don’t think it was funny, I understand. Humor is subjective. And I don’t need to believe in something that has proof that it is a fact. That the sections were missing from the government website is true. The how and why, I made no comment on. The humor is based on the fact that the missing sections are specifically about your civil right for due process. The Constitution protects you too, little man. Stop chasing me like an angry, yappy little dog. You jumped the shark. Sorry, failing to concede it like a respectable human being is all on you.
|
|