|
Post by mikemonger on Apr 28, 2024 19:17:53 GMT
Notice how the only thing you're capable of doing is repeating thr same tired talking point someone else gave you? It really is all you're capable of and shows you have NO IDEA what you're talking about. As someone who develops web apps for a friggen living, I know full well why data connectivity needs to be treated as a vital utility, no different than phones, water, or power. You, on thr other hand, don't have a clue and can only parrot talking points. Go on. Ask me again how no NN impacted me. It's all you're capable of...lol You said you 'need' net neutrality, and yet, you didn't have it for the last seven years. How were you able to get along without it if you 'needed' it? I didn't say "we need Net Neutrality" you lying sack of shit. I said data connectivity needs to be treated as a vital utility like phones, water, and power are. Are you stupid or just inherently dishonest?
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Apr 28, 2024 19:19:07 GMT
So how were you able to survive without NN for the last seven years? Actually dumbass let me remind you of Parler. Remember when everyone dropped them and yoyr kind was all upset? Did you realize that Parker was able to keep its phone service, it's electricity, and it's water, but NOT it's internet? Chew on that one wonderbrain. In your world, the FCC could just censor Parler off the internet. That's what I would like to avoid. Internet content should not be regulated/censored like radio and television is.
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Apr 28, 2024 19:19:32 GMT
So how were you able to survive without NN for the last seven years? Internet service providers should be allowed to throttle traffic to any website/service so long as you're not personally affected or can "survive" that, is what you're saying? Can you show me an example of that happening?
|
|
|
Post by mikemonger on Apr 28, 2024 19:20:05 GMT
Actually dumbass let me remind you of Parler. Remember when everyone dropped them and yoyr kind was all upset? Did you realize that Parker was able to keep its phone service, it's electricity, and it's water, but NOT it's internet? Chew on that one wonderbrain. In your world, the FCC could just censor Parler off the internet. That's what I would like to avoid. Internet content should not be regulated/censored like radio and television is. So...you're stupid...lol NO NN enabled Parler to get pulled. NN would have prevented that.
|
|
|
Post by mikemonger on Apr 28, 2024 19:20:38 GMT
Internet service providers should be allowed to throttle traffic to any website/service so long as you're not personally affected or can "survive" that, is what you're saying? Can you show me an example of that happening? They were hammering Netflix with it until Netflix agreed to pay more.
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Apr 28, 2024 19:21:26 GMT
In your world, the FCC could just censor Parler off the internet. That's what I would like to avoid. Internet content should not be regulated/censored like radio and television is. So...you're stupid...lol NO NN enabled Parler to get pulled. NN would have prevented that. No, an FCC takeover of the internet would have allowed to FCC to pull Parler themselves.
|
|
|
Post by mikemonger on Apr 28, 2024 19:22:28 GMT
So...you're stupid...lol NO NN enabled Parler to get pulled. NN would have prevented that. No, an FCC takeover of the internet would have allowed to FCC to pull Parler themselves. Again, the more you post, the more you demonstrate you have no idea what you're taling about...lol Can the FCC censor phone calls?
|
|
|
Post by Dracula on Apr 28, 2024 19:25:19 GMT
Internet service providers should be allowed to throttle traffic to any website/service so long as you're not personally affected or can "survive" that, is what you're saying? Can you show me an example of that happening? I already showed you many in the post you ignored: imdb1.freeforums.net/post/905983. They've throttled Skype and YouTube to name a few, and also general video on mobile unless the customer pays extra. Now can you answer my question?
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Apr 28, 2024 19:29:15 GMT
No, an FCC takeover of the internet would have allowed to FCC to pull Parler themselves. Again, the more you post, the more you demonstrate you have no idea what you're taling about...lol Can the FCC censor phone calls? No, but they censor TV and radio. Canada's CRTC (Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission) has laid out a framework to censor podcasts. Our FCC would have to hijack the internet before copying the CRTC, which they're doing now under the guise of a problem that doesn't exist.
Why should we trust an unelected agency that censors TV and radio to control our internet?
|
|
|
Post by mikemonger on Apr 28, 2024 19:31:41 GMT
Again, the more you post, the more you demonstrate you have no idea what you're taling about...lol Can the FCC censor phone calls? No, but they censor TV and radio. Canada's CRTC (Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission) has laid out a framework to censor podcasts. Our FCC would have to hijack the internet before copying the CRTC, which they're doing now under the guise of a problem that doesn't exist.
Why should we trust an unelected agency that censors TV and radio to control our internet?
Except the rules equate data with phone, not TV or radio. Dumbass. Tell us more how ignorant you are.
|
|
|
Post by Dracula on Apr 28, 2024 19:32:47 GMT
"Control our Internet"...by prohibiting ISPs from doing just that.
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Apr 28, 2024 19:38:08 GMT
"Control our Internet"...by prohibiting ISPs from doing just that. Broadcast radio is more censored than satellite radio. Broadcast TV is more censored than cable TV. If we follow this pattern, FCC-controlled internet will be more censored than ISP-controlled internet. Why should I trust the censorious FCC more than the ISPs?
If you support the government censoring podcasts, blogs, youtube videos, etc, why don't you just be a man and say so?
|
|
|
Post by Dracula on Apr 28, 2024 19:41:32 GMT
"Control our Internet"...by prohibiting ISPs from doing just that. Broadcast radio is more censored than satellite radio. Broadcast TV is more censored than cable TV. If we follow this pattern, FCC-controlled internet will be more censored than ISP-controlled internet. Why should I trust the censorious FCC more than the ISPs? The FCC's authority to censor anything is limited to over-the-air, not Internet content. Net neutrality has literally nothing to do with the FCC censoring anything at all on the Internet. ISPs though, do in fact right now have the power to throttle traffic to this or that website, and that is what net neutrality prohibits them from doing.
|
|
|
Post by mikemonger on Apr 28, 2024 20:05:10 GMT
Broadcast radio is more censored than satellite radio. Broadcast TV is more censored than cable TV. If we follow this pattern, FCC-controlled internet will be more censored than ISP-controlled internet. Why should I trust the censorious FCC more than the ISPs? The FCC's authority to censor anything is limited to over-the-air, not Internet content. Net neutrality has literally nothing to do with the FCC censoring anything at all on the Internet. ISPs though, do in fact right now have the power to throttle traffic to this or that website, and that is what net neutrality prohibits them from doing. It also prevents ISPs from denying service based on political ideology. Something this dumbass should be all for after that Parler thing a while ago.
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Apr 28, 2024 21:30:52 GMT
And I still don't understand what all the upset is over treating internet connectivity as a vital utility like phones....
So that'll be handed out for 'free' to those that claim poverty, too? Great
|
|