|
|
Post by yggdrasil on Nov 23, 2019 19:49:54 GMT
Love it. Big thumbs up. Cute as hell too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Nov 23, 2019 21:02:04 GMT
Foxes, apparently.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2019 21:15:05 GMT
Idiot. They're clearly pandas. |
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Nov 24, 2019 7:44:14 GMT
Idiot. They're clearly pandas. Wrong. (There's a surprise.) They are red pandas, which are not a form of panda. Red pandas are most closely related to raccoons; they are not related to pandas so to describe a red panda as a panda is erroneous. |
|
|
|
Post by yggdrasil on Nov 25, 2019 10:17:59 GMT
Don'r care what they are called, I want a couple.
|
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Nov 25, 2019 13:54:54 GMT
Don'r care what they are called, I want a couple. They are endangered, sadly. Fewer than 10,000 in the wild. |
|
|
|
Post by yggdrasil on Nov 25, 2019 16:16:01 GMT
Don'r care what they are called, I want a couple. They are endangered, sadly. Fewer than 10,000 in the wild. Where's their natural habitat? Not China I hope. |
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Nov 25, 2019 17:20:41 GMT
Where's their natural habitat? Not China I hope. Tibet and south-west China. |
|
|
|
Post by yggdrasil on Nov 25, 2019 17:42:18 GMT
Where's their natural habitat? Not China I hope. Tibet and south-west China. I feared that, no doubt the twats thing eating them makes them virile or some such nonsense. |
|
