|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Feb 7, 2020 19:36:47 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2020 19:45:09 GMT
I rimmed a girl in the beer garden of the Fox and Goose in Hebden Bridge.
|
|
|
Post by yggdrasil on Feb 8, 2020 10:44:31 GMT
Sadly, too many disappearing these days. Publicans are often forced to buy from one supplier only as part of their tenancy agreement when they could get it cheaper elsewhere.Law has needed changing properly for at least a decade or two. Big chains own so many of the damn things nowadays.
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Feb 8, 2020 11:05:52 GMT
Sadly, too many disappearing these days. Publicans are often forced to buy from one supplier only as part of their tenancy agreement when they could get it cheaper elsewhere.Law has needed changing properly for at least a decade or two. Big chains own so many of the damn things nowadays. Tory cuts.
|
|
|
Post by yggdrasil on Feb 8, 2020 11:23:56 GMT
Sadly, too many disappearing these days. Publicans are often forced to buy from one supplier only as part of their tenancy agreement when they could get it cheaper elsewhere.Law has needed changing properly for at least a decade or two. Big chains own so many of the damn things nowadays. Tory cuts. Sadly more to do with lobbying from the big "pubco's". The law was going to change a few years back but got watered down, like a lot of the beer.
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Feb 8, 2020 12:55:14 GMT
Sadly more to do with lobbying from the big "pubco's". The law was going to change a few years back but got watered down, like a lot of the beer. Why would the law intervene in such a thing?
|
|
|
Post by yggdrasil on Feb 8, 2020 17:49:09 GMT
Sadly more to do with lobbying from the big "pubco's". The law was going to change a few years back but got watered down, like a lot of the beer. Why would the law intervene in such a thing? Due to the numbers of small businesses being forced out by effective cartels. It goes against freedom of doing business to be tied down to artificially expensive prices. Speak to some landlords hard to get them stop talking about it once they start. There have been some successes in the courts but the pubcos are putting expensive escape clauses in to put tenants off.
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Feb 8, 2020 20:44:34 GMT
Due to the numbers of small businesses being forced out by effective cartels. It goes against freedom of doing business to be tied down to artificially expensive prices. Speak to some landlords hard to get them stop talking about it once they start. There have been some successes in the courts but the pubcos are putting expensive escape clauses in to put tenants off. How are they forced out? If the prices at pubcos are more expensive, why do people go there? Bottom line is that more customers prefer the pubcos. Independents need to up their game, simple as that.
|
|
|
Post by yggdrasil on Feb 9, 2020 15:19:45 GMT
Due to the numbers of small businesses being forced out by effective cartels. It goes against freedom of doing business to be tied down to artificially expensive prices. Speak to some landlords hard to get them stop talking about it once they start. There have been some successes in the courts but the pubcos are putting expensive escape clauses in to put tenants off. How are they forced out? If the prices at pubcos are more expensive, why do people go there? Bottom line is that more customers prefer the pubcos. Independents need to up their game, simple as that. No, they aren't more expensive, the landlords who are in effect small business men and women are forced to buy at a higher price direct from the pubco when they could buy the beer cheaper elsewhere but then sell it at low prices dictated by the pubco. That way the pubco stays competitive by taking their profit margin from the landlord instead of the customer. Hope that explains it correctly.
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Feb 9, 2020 16:10:56 GMT
the landlords who are in effect small business men and women are forced to buy at a higher price direct from the pubco How are they forced? That's absolute nonsense. The landlord voluntarily sells their premise to the pubco thinking they are going to get rich and doesn't read the contract due to being stupid. Well tough fucking shit. No-one is forcing them to do anything.
|
|
|
Post by yggdrasil on Feb 9, 2020 18:15:15 GMT
the landlords who are in effect small business men and women are forced to buy at a higher price direct from the pubco How are they forced? That's absolute nonsense. The landlord voluntarily sells their premise to the pubco thinking they are going to get rich and doesn't read the contract due to being stupid. Well tough fucking shit. No-one is forcing them to do anything. No they are not owners of previous premises these are people running a pub as tenant landlords who are hostage to the whims of pubco pricing strategy. They didn't own the pub beforehand. As I say though, the pubcos don't mind as they get rid of the tenant and sell to housing firms, this is why there has been a terrible amount of pub closures. Vital parts of the community, the government should encourage their existence . Your in one of your everything the big companies do is right moods though so I won't bother posting on it again. This level of black and white on everything viewpoint you have adopted of late, makes conversation rather pointless. Perhaps the board is doomed to super hero arguments and you and Hux calling each other names forever and ever.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2020 20:39:13 GMT
Pub of the year. BBCNot many blacks.
|
|