|
Post by ayatollah on May 4, 2021 7:46:06 GMT
I think it's disgusting that jurors reported being intimidated. At least one said so.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on May 4, 2021 15:57:25 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Joc Spader on May 4, 2021 16:07:26 GMT
I think it's disgusting that jurors reported being intimidated. At least one said so. How can we use Johnny Cockroach's line of "If the glove don't fit... acquit mothafuka!"?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2021 6:01:05 GMT
I think it's disgusting that jurors reported being intimidated. At least one said so. Where did you read that? And again, there was camera footage and good luck convincing people that they didn't see what they saw. Lol.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2021 6:02:34 GMT
Yes, they are asking for a new trial. Lol.
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on May 5, 2021 6:40:04 GMT
I think it's disgusting that jurors reported being intimidated. At least one said so. Where did you read that? And again, there was camera footage and good luck convincing people that they didn't see what they saw. Lol. Whether they saw what they saw, there's still grounds for mistrial if there's juror intimidation. Lol. Or if one of the jury is a biased activist who lied to get on the jury. Lol.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2021 6:51:37 GMT
Where did you read that? And again, there was camera footage and good luck convincing people that they didn't see what they saw. Lol. Whether they saw what they saw, there's still grounds for mistrial if there's juror intimidation. Lol. Or if one of the jury is a biased activist who lied to get on the jury. Lol. A court gets to decide over that and not some morons on a board.
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on May 5, 2021 7:07:47 GMT
Whether they saw what they saw, there's still grounds for mistrial if there's juror intimidation. Lol. Or if one of the jury is a biased activist who lied to get on the jury. Lol. A court gets to decide over that and not some morons on a board. Wait, what?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2021 7:23:34 GMT
A court gets to decide over that and not some morons on a board. Wait, what? Damn, Monkeys, another yawn. See you tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on May 5, 2021 7:37:19 GMT
Damn, Monkeys, another yawn. See you tomorrow. Good, all these insults about morons is quite unbecoming. And by the way, you seem to think that people on twitter do decide. Better if you practice what you preach and all that...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2021 9:45:52 GMT
Damn, Monkeys, another yawn. See you tomorrow. Good, all these insults about morons is quite unbecoming. And by the way, you seem to think that people on twitter do decide. Better if you practice what you preach and all that... I never said it was Twitter that decided. I wasn't among those who cried "Freedom of Speech" when the big fat orange troll got banned. Never thought you were a defender of morons.
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on May 5, 2021 10:30:37 GMT
Good, all these insults about morons is quite unbecoming. And by the way, you seem to think that people on twitter do decide. Better if you practice what you preach and all that... I never said it was Twitter that decided. I wasn't among those who cried "Freedom of Speech" when the big fat orange troll got banned. Never thought you were a defender of morons. Yes but you did say "morons on a board" decide and I gave Twitter as an example of morons on a board who wield power and do influence decisions. One person's moron is another person's expert...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2021 10:45:17 GMT
I never said it was Twitter that decided. I wasn't among those who cried "Freedom of Speech" when the big fat orange troll got banned. Never thought you were a defender of morons. Yes but you did say "morons on a board" decide and I gave Twitter as an example of morons on a board who wield power and do influence decisions.
One person's moron is another person's expert... What? I mean, I never said that those fascists on that tweet weren't morons. I don't think they have any expertise on anything, but revisionist history.
|
|
|
Post by ayatollah on May 5, 2021 12:17:00 GMT
I think it's disgusting that jurors reported being intimidated. At least one said so. Where did you read that? And again, there was camera footage and good luck convincing people that they didn't see what they saw. Lol. It's been widely reported that one alternate juror said she was intimidated, someone was caught in the act taking pictures of the jury and judge judge didn't confiscate her phone, and there were riots over Duante Wright going on at the time of the trial. How do you not know this?
|
|
|
Post by yggdrasil on May 5, 2021 12:19:20 GMT
Seems that some intimidation is okay though. eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/04/19/chauvin-trial-defense-witness-barry-brodds-former-house-vandalized/7282087002/"A group of people vandalized the former Northern California home of an expert witness who testified for the defense in the murder trial of Derek Chauvin, police said, throwing a pig's head on the front porch and blood splatter on the house. The incident occurred in Santa Rosa, California, where retired police officer Barry Brodd once lived and worked. Brodd testified last week in Chauvin's trial, saying the former Minneapolis police officer was "justified" in his use of force against George Floyd, who died in police custody last May." .....No doubt worth a "yawn" from Monkeys, Shady and other member's of the officer's fan club.
|
|