|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Feb 12, 2022 12:11:35 GMT
That's different to genocide though and there's no evidence of that. The poster in question is quite tall and has obviously knocked his head into so many doorframes over the decades that words have lost all meaning. Perhaps I should sympathise rather than berate. There won't be. They'll destroy the evidence. They're awesome at it. It's what they do. So you can't say there's genocide. The report you linked to says: "She saw others who had been churned through the system and released." Don't you think that if vast number so of people were disappearing and not coming back she would have said that? |
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Feb 12, 2022 12:30:36 GMT
There won't be. They'll destroy the evidence. They're awesome at it. It's what they do. So you can't say there's genocide. The report you linked to says: "She saw others who had been churned through the system and released." Don't you think that if vast number so of people were disappearing and not coming back she would have said that? It's the Chinese Communist Party. Judging from their history, it's safe to assume they're committing genocide until they definitively prove otherwise. |
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Feb 12, 2022 13:37:37 GMT
So you can't say there's genocide. The report you linked to says: "She saw others who had been churned through the system and released." Don't you think that if vast number so of people were disappearing and not coming back she would have said that? It's the Chinese Communist Party. Judging from their history, it's safe to assume they're committing genocide until they definitively prove otherwise. But not even the people who have escaped are saying so. Okay then. |
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Feb 12, 2022 13:42:47 GMT
It's the Chinese Communist Party. Judging from their history, it's safe to assume they're committing genocide until they definitively prove otherwise. But not even the people who have escaped are saying so. Okay then. If they aren't committing genocide, they should get their shit together. What's the point of venerating and celebrating Mao if you won't murder people? |
|
|
|
Post by cryptoflovecraft on Feb 12, 2022 16:06:25 GMT
The Nationalist right (e.g., Marine Le Pen) generally opposes going to war with Russia, too.
I approve of the National Front's position on Russia and Ukraine:
For the sake of keeping peace in the region, Ukraine should never be allowed to join NATO. Ukrainian neutrality and avoiding a new Cold War is in the best interests of Ukraine, Russia and the West. However, Ukraine should be allowed to have its independence and to make its own decisions on other matters. If it wants to "lean West" and do more business with Western countries, let it lean West, but if it wants to have closer ties to Russia instead, let it have closer ties to Russia. Very simple.
That said, Crimea will remain a part of Russia. Crimeans decided that in a referendum.
|
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Feb 13, 2022 8:21:20 GMT
The Nationalist right (e.g., Marine Le Pen) generally opposes going to war with Russia, too. I approve of the National Front's position on Russia and Ukraine: For the sake of keeping peace in the region, Ukraine should never be allowed to join NATO. Ukrainian neutrality and avoiding a new Cold War is in the best interests of Ukraine, Russia and the West. However, Ukraine should be allowed to have its independence and to make its own decisions on other matters. If it wants to "lean West" and do more business with Western countries, let it lean West, but if it wants to have closer ties to Russia instead, let it have closer ties to Russia. Very simple. That said, Crimea will remain a part of Russia. Crimeans decided that in a referendum. The solution seems simple to me: Sign a 100 year contract that says NATO will not allow Ukraine in and Russia will not invade. Done - everyone can go home. |
|
