Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2022 1:10:19 GMT
To be fair, how is he wrong? Do you understand the trauma it caused me when a grown adult on this very forum judged my 16 year old body!? You just laughed. No, I didn't. I'm very phlegmatic. And since it's his assertion, he's going to have to define how he thinks it's right before we get to the business of me proving it wrong. I'm hurting, dawg!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2022 8:51:41 GMT
They don’t need to groom the kids. You guys are doing just fine. I dont exactly agree with this either but there's a difference between pretending to be a girl and being a girl. 11 years old, you really think it's ok for a child to change genders? The brain isnt fully developed until around 25 or even later. 21 in America is the drinking age, voting I believe too. Aren't we meant to protect kids from psychological and developmental complexities? Again, 11 years old....just think about it..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2022 10:47:10 GMT
You were triggered by this topic too? Hey, you're the one who idolises a paedo, not me. Im sorry I didn't mean to upset you. I'll lay off my criticism of pedos in the future.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Apr 27, 2022 10:53:25 GMT
Transgender designer is accused of 'child abuse' for selling pants that seek to 'flatten' the genitals of boys as young as four - as doctors warn the underwear could cause infertility'Stephanie Davies-Arai, of campaign group Transgender Trend, said: ‘The fact that a child is sexualised in this way and their sexual parts are treated according to adult ideas, is abuse of the child. It feels barbaric to actually interfere with a child’s genitals in that way.’
Last night, Carmen Liu said: ‘Your claims are absurd, unfounded and without merit.’ She said the criticism came ‘at a convenient time when legislation to ban conversion therapy to exclude transgender people is in the media and subject to wide outrage and protest.
'This… is an attempt to cast contempt on the community at a time when support and understanding is needed most.’Perhaps a community that uses the bodies of children to further their agenda deserves some contempt.
|
|
|
Post by PaulsLaugh on Apr 27, 2022 22:03:18 GMT
They don’t need to groom the kids. You guys are doing just fine. I dont exactly agree with this either but there's a difference between pretending to be a girl and being a girl. 11 years old, you really think it's ok for a child to change genders? The brain isnt fully developed until around 25 or even later. 21 in America is the drinking age, voting I believe too. Aren't we meant to protect kids from psychological and developmental complexities? Again, 11 years old....just think about it.. It should like all their health choices, be the parents’ decision. There seems to be the delusion among the right that transgender kids are falling from the sky, but they are actually rare.* Due to the sensational subject matter, it gets attention. The Right can’t stop thinking about it. They are up to blaming any Disney fan or liberal as pedophiles now. Millions of children in the US are live in conditions of poverty and disease and in more danger of being randomly shot. I never hear a peep from the ”save the children” police about that. Why the huge concern for a kid’s genitalia and not the rest of the body? *About 0.7 percent of 13- to 17-year-olds living in the United States identify as transgender, some 150,000 teenagers, according to an estimate released in January by the Williams Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law. The think tank, which researches issues related to sexual orientation and gender identity, based its estimates on statistical modeling rather than direct surveys of children. www.edweek.org/leadership/how-many-transgender-children-are-there/2017/03
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2022 22:46:50 GMT
Hmm minors are being sexualized for what purpose? Are they going to be doctors, policeman, lawyers, teachers, scientists? Nope no reason to sexualize minors for any of those. I wonder what they are being groomed for? It's a mystery.
|
|
|
Post by slowcomingwarbird on Apr 27, 2022 23:19:17 GMT
Gross. A child shouldnt be doing that... The goal is to generate as much public outrage as possible because outrage results in higher ratings. Higher ratings generate more revenue, somebody is getting really rich off of this whole Urban Housewives Campaign. But more importantly it keeps the public distracted from higher inflation a failing stockmarket a shortage of food all caused by the war and the pandemic. So that the wealth disparity continues to go unnoticed and the wealthy can continue to live like kings right up until the very end where there is a complete and total collapse of society. The Republican answer to the pandemic is to try to force as many people as possible to breed which is the entire purpose behind the Urban Housewives Campaign. Seeing as how more than 81 million people in the United States are currently actively infected with Covid. There is an acknowledgment that there is no possible way to bring the pandemic under control. Which is why the Republican party is so focused on making all abortion illegal and attacking the LGBT community with such ferocity at any cost. To create another population boom so that wars used to kill off those that the Alt-Right considers to be undesirables would not put the general population at as much risk of extinction. Which is to say that Right Wingers intend to use the pandemic to get away with ethnic cleansing by hiding it right out in plain sight. By using the Covid pandemic as plausible deniability.
|
|
|
Post by slowcomingwarbird on Apr 27, 2022 23:28:00 GMT
Meanwhile, dudes are buying their kid shirts with stuff like "Ladies Man" on it. I just have to laugh out loud at your complete misunderstanding of the term "Ladies Man". Which has always meant a man who sexually peruses women attempting to breed with as many of them as possible. The more polite way of describing a "Masher", both terms have meant that as far back as the 1800's or before. It is more a comment on the fear Right Wingers have that the pandemic is killing off so many people so quickly that they fear there is not enough time for people to grow up and have children of their own. So it is a disgusting attempt on the part of the Right Wing to "normalize" children being used as a sexual object. Therefore the term "Ladies Man" doesn't mean "sissy" as you appeared to try to imply. That the Right Wing attempt at focusing in on whether or not children will grow up to have children of their own is a way of sneaking in the sexualizing of children as a psychology experiment. To see if people will recoil in horror at it or join in on condemning the perceived so called gay threat to society. Either way it is psychological manipulation of the public to try to normalize what is taboo.
|
|
|
Post by PaulsLaugh on Apr 28, 2022 0:09:14 GMT
Hmm minors are being sexualized for what purpose? Are they going to be doctors, policeman, lawyers, teachers, scientists? Nope no reason to sexualize minors for any of those. I wonder what they are being groomed for? It's a mystery. Do you really care about these children? Yes or no.
|
|
|
Post by PaulsLaugh on Apr 28, 2022 0:19:53 GMT
Meanwhile, dudes are buying their kid shirts with stuff like "Ladies Man" on it. I just have to laugh out loud at your complete misunderstanding of the term "Ladies Man". Which has always meant a man who sexually peruses women attempting to breed with as many of them as possible. The more polite way of describing a "Masher", both terms have meant that as far back as the 1800's or before. It is more a comment on the fear Right Wingers have that the pandemic is killing off so many people so quickly that they fear there is not enough time for people to grow up and have children of their own. So it is a disgusting attempt on the part of the Right Wing to "normalize" children being used as a sexual object. Therefore the term "Ladies Man" doesn't mean "sissy" as you appeared to try to imply. That the Right Wing attempt at focusing in on whether or not children will grow up to have children of their own is a way of sneaking in the sexualizing of children as a psychology experiment. To see if people will recoil in horror at it or join in on condemning the perceived so called gay threat to society. Either way it is psychological manipulation of the public to try to normalize what is taboo. Considering the only time right wingers, Christian or otherwise, pretend they want to “save the children,“ is when somebody’s cock or cunt is involved. Antiabortionists are not about really saving children because the Right Wingers would gladly destroy a poor child at the border. They certainly separated mothers from their children with no mercy. It is about a woman having control of her own pussy. The thoughts that a 15 year old boy might want his dick cut off in exchange for a camel toe freaks them out to no end. They must nightmares about it. Women and children’s lives belong to the menfolk. So, beyond the sexual organs, they 100% do not care about the children, mothers, or unborn babies. They are claiming ownership rights.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2022 8:07:42 GMT
I dont exactly agree with this either but there's a difference between pretending to be a girl and being a girl. 11 years old, you really think it's ok for a child to change genders? The brain isnt fully developed until around 25 or even later. 21 in America is the drinking age, voting I believe too. Aren't we meant to protect kids from psychological and developmental complexities? Again, 11 years old....just think about it.. It should like all their health choices, be the parents’ decision. There seems to be the delusion among the right that transgender kids are falling from the sky, but they are actually rare.* Due to the sensational subject matter, it gets attention. The Right can’t stop thinking about it. They are up to blaming any Disney fan or liberal as pedophiles now. Millions of children in the US are live in conditions of poverty and disease and in more danger of being randomly shot. I never hear a peep from the ”save the children” police about that. Why the huge concern for a kid’s genitalia and not the rest of the body? *About 0.7 percent of 13- to 17-year-olds living in the United States identify as transgender, some 150,000 teenagers, according to an estimate released in January by the Williams Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law. The think tank, which researches issues related to sexual orientation and gender identity, based its estimates on statistical modeling rather than direct surveys of children. www.edweek.org/leadership/how-many-transgender-children-are-there/2017/03I guess it depends on how far the parents are willing to go with their child. Even so that it's rare why are they trying to make 1st graders learn about it, like it's commonplace. You would have so so many poor, confused children right? It's all for the children...
|
|