|
Post by CrepedCrusader on Feb 3, 2023 22:26:27 GMT
I was checking out the RT critic and audience scores for the Peacock show Poker Face, and the difference between the critic rating (99%) and audience rating (79%) was quite surprising. Then I looked at the actual average ratings. (FYI, for those who don't know: the "tomato scores" reflect the % of votes that were "positive" and is not the actual average rating.) RT uses a 10-point scale for critic averages and a 5-star scale for audience averages. The average critic rating was 8.5/10 and the average audience rating was 4/5. Or, to express those numbers as percentages, the average critic rating was 85% and the average audience rating was 80%. Only a 5-point difference rather than the 20-point difference the tomato scores would lead you to believe.
|
|
|
Post by Joc Spader on Feb 4, 2023 0:10:37 GMT
Creeped! Been a while since I saw you.
|
|
|
Post by CrepedCrusader on Feb 4, 2023 4:34:30 GMT
Creeped! Been a while since I saw you. I've been busy creepin'.
|
|
|
Post by yggdrasil on Feb 6, 2023 12:26:56 GMT
None of those type things are worth taking notice of, just find a film reviewer whose opinions you respect and go by them.
|
|
|
Post by Meseia on Apr 2, 2023 4:06:23 GMT
It's a website, they write the code, control the code, control the votes, and they do it for money. It's vanity voting. Especially RT. The score is whatever they say.
|
|