|
Post by Stammerhead on Mar 28, 2023 21:28:09 GMT
Why should I address a theory that has absolutely nothing to do with the subject of this thread? How much time do you think I have to waste? He feels the need to bang a drum andI can’t throw a petty insult at the superior being? Oh gosh! But you did address it with an insult instead. And then claim you were attacked first with his very general statement about vaccine coercion. Poor thing. And we were coerced. You couldn't even get on a plane until you had the vax. Whether it was necessary is another issue. But you don't address issues. You throw snarky insults on what had been hitherto a pleasant thread. You're an insult troll. Where did I say I was attacked first? If I remember correctly I pointed out how conspiracy theorists insult people after Toasty decided to go on about covid vaccines in a thread about maths, drugs and Scottish folk. I might have to look this up but at present I’m trying to watch a film with a ginger cat on my lap.
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Mar 28, 2023 21:32:14 GMT
Actually it was Pilar who first made mention of lisping in this thread and with no mention of sexuality. I win! You don't say? I made the gay joke about lisping, not Pilar. Try to keep up. If only we could put you in a cage like that mutt. Try reading through the thread and you will see what I mean. imdb1.freeforums.net/post/278886/threadAnd the dog isn’t in a cage but never mind. You still don’t understand how a lisp works.
|
|
|
Post by mowlick on Mar 28, 2023 22:02:53 GMT
You don't say? I made the gay joke about lisping, not Pilar. Try to keep up. If only we could put you in a cage like that mutt. Try reading through the thread and you will see what I mean. imdb1.freeforums.net/post/278886/threadAnd the dog isn’t in a cage but never mind. You still don’t understand how a lisp works. Looks like the poor bugger has been taken short.
Anyway, here is Q3
3. The sequence u1, u2, u3, ... is defined by
un+1 = k − 24/un
where u1= 2
and where k is an integer.
Given that u1 + 2u2 + u3 = 0
(a) show that
3k2 − 58k + 240 = 0
3 marks
(b) Find the value of k, giving a reason for your answer.
2 marks
(c) Find the value of u3
1 mark
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Mar 28, 2023 22:21:06 GMT
Looks like the poor bugger has been taken short.
Anyway, here is Q3
3. The sequence u1, u2, u3, ... is defined by
un+1 = k − 24/un
where u1= 2
and where k is an integer.
Given that u1 + 2u2 + u3 = 0
(a) show that
3k2 − 58k + 240 = 0
3 marks
(b) Find the value of k, giving a reason for your answer.
2 marks
(c) Find the value of u3
1 mark
Numbers! Numbers! Numbers!
|
|
|
Post by yggdrasil on Mar 29, 2023 9:01:10 GMT
Was supposed to be about maths but yanks can't go more than 2 minutes without things tuning into conspiracy theory talk. We are just "sheeple" for not seeing what their special (at least to their moms) minds can see. Uh, no. Us "yanks" didn't say anything about conspiracy theories. That was Australia & England. The Empire. Where did a "yank" say anything about a conspiracy theory? Thought he was American, my mistake. Those moronic conspiracies most often are.
|
|
|
Post by yggdrasil on Mar 29, 2023 9:06:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Prince Myshkin on Mar 29, 2023 16:53:11 GMT
Uh, no. Us "yanks" didn't say anything about conspiracy theories. That was Australia & England. The Empire. Where did a "yank" say anything about a conspiracy theory? Thought he was American, my mistake. Those moronic conspiracies most often are. Oh yeah, Toasty is Australian. Honestly though, the one who kept yapping about conspiracies was Stammaman.
|
|
|
Post by Prince Myshkin on Mar 29, 2023 19:43:30 GMT
You don't say? I made the gay joke about lisping, not Pilar. Try to keep up. If only we could put you in a cage like that mutt. Try reading through the thread and you will see what I mean. imdb1.freeforums.net/post/278886/threadAnd the dog isn’t in a cage but never mind. You still don’t understand how a lisp works. Stamm, I read through the thread and it was pleasant enough until you started making snide thinly veiled insults. Yes, Toasty disrupted the pleasantness by talking politics, but there were no ad hominem attacks and personal insults until you discovered the thread.
Now before you get angry and vow to leave v1 and post only on v2, I have a compromise.
Perhaps Flying Monkeys could ban you from the Pleasant Conversation board. You could still post on the Soapbox and insult everyone to your heart's content. :)
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Mar 29, 2023 20:47:28 GMT
Stamm, I read through the thread and it was pleasant enough until you started making snide thinly veiled insults. Yes, Toasty disrupted the pleasantness by talking politics, but there were no ad hominem attacks and personal insults until you discovered the thread.
Now before you get angry and vow to leave v1 and post only on v2, I have a compromise.
Perhaps Flying Monkeys could ban you from the Pleasant Conversation board. You could still post on the Soapbox and insult everyone to your heart's content. I'm sorry that Toasty decided to disrupt the thread by acting like a conspiracy theorist. I suppose the need to bang on continuously is very important for some people. Gives them a reason to carry on I guess. :)
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Mar 30, 2023 7:08:19 GMT
Looks like the poor bugger has been taken short. Anyway, here is Q3 3. The sequence u1, u2, u3, ... is defined by un+1 = k − 24/un
where u1= 2
and where k is an integer. Given that u1 + 2u2 + u3 = 0 (a) show that 3k2 − 58k + 240 = 0 3 marks (b) Find the value of k, giving a reason for your answer.
2 marks (c) Find the value of u3
1 mark
(a) If u1 + 2u2 + u3 = 0
and u1= 2
Then 2 + 2x(k - 24/2) + (k - 24/(k - 24/2) = 0 2 + 2k - 24 + k - 24/(k - 12) = 0 2(k - 12) + 2k(k - 12) - 24(k-12) + k(k - 12) - 24 = 0 2k - 24 + 2k2 - 24k - 24k + 288 + k2 - 12k - 24 = 0 3k2 - 58k + 240 = 0
(b)
k(3k - 58) = -240 k(58 - 3k) = 240
k must be a positive integer and 3k < 58, i.e. k < 20 Also k and (58 - 3k) are factors of 240 k can be 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15 For each of those, (58 - 3k) would be 52, 49, 46, 43, 40, 34, 28, 22, 13 For each combination, k(58 - 3k) = 104, 147, 184, 215, 240... > k = 6
(c)
u3 = (k - 24/(k - 24/2) = (6 - 24/(6 - 12)) = (6 - -4) u3 = 10
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Mar 30, 2023 8:05:15 GMT
You are one of the snarkiest around here and your response proves this.
So you are insecure about being inferior, because you can't see the conspiracies that the superiors can?
Keep on insulting people, Toasty. This tactic is working wonders. :) So you've never made snarky remarks before, to go along with your conspiracy denial of the establishment?
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Mar 30, 2023 8:06:47 GMT
Hey Monkeys, was this really meant to be a pleasant conversation? :) I guess your snarkiness turned it around.
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Mar 30, 2023 8:08:33 GMT
What duplicitous bullshit. [gay eyes]
Uh, you insulted him first. You inferred he's a conspiracy theorist and he's wacko for not being vaccinated. I'm pro-vax. But unlike you I don't make ad hominem attacks on the matter.
But you do this shit all the time and then play victim when others defend themselves.
I'm sorry that he felt the need to keep on insulting those who don't believe in The Plandemic. I'm sorry you felt the need to insult those that do.
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Mar 30, 2023 8:10:51 GMT
I called him a conspiracy theorist. How is that an insult? Sounds pretty grand to me. :) It's an insult. If you think he's wrong, address why, you self righteous "cunt". <<< Notice I put that in quotes. It's one of the insults you love to throw.
Which goes to my point, you came onto this pleasant thread and offensively attacked people. You did. Nobody else. He can't, because he's brainwashed.
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Mar 30, 2023 8:14:05 GMT
Stamm, I read through the thread and it was pleasant enough until you started making snide thinly veiled insults. Yes, Toasty disrupted the pleasantness by talking politics, but there were no ad hominem attacks and personal insults until you discovered the thread.
Now before you get angry and vow to leave v1 and post only on v2, I have a compromise.
Perhaps Flying Monkeys could ban you from the Pleasant Conversation board. You could still post on the Soapbox and insult everyone to your heart's content. :) And my comment was only referring to the stats posted, which was a relevant point.
|
|