You have not established a correlation...much less causation...much, much less liability.
Left wing fascists insulting the intelligence of it's own supporters by calling themselves "antifa" targeted Ngo, an independent journalist, for assault and battery.
He's irrefutably the
victim of violent acts...I see nothing indicating he's a leader of any.
I'm more inclined to believe your allegation is more about using the diversity of tactics approach in alignment with them.
No sir, you do not get to troll by mentioning "antifa".
What is under discussion here is how Andy Ngo contributes to gun violence, you don't get to mention anything else
about Andy Ngo because his so called professional victomhood is irrelevant to this discussion.
www.dailydot.com/debug/portand-shooter-andy-ngo-youtube-comment/You can't just go around shooting people in public because they are protesting.
You are not allowed to use 2nd amendment rights to cancel out someone else's 1st amendment rights.
Your rights end where they begin to infringe on someone else's rights
that isn't rocket science, that is the way the Constitution works.
If you are afraid of the protesting crowds then you shouldn't be out there provoking or interacting with them.
That is the way the law should look at that situation, that you don't get to deliberately put yourself
in harm's way and then claim "self defense". You don't get to claim "self defense" while in the act
of committing the crime of vigilantism or criminal trespass with a deadly weapon.
Yes that means from a legal standpoint that you have to keep track of where you are at and who's property you are on
when you decide to pull that trigger. Because if you don't, one of two things can happen.
Either law enforcement can lock you away in prison forever, or the owner of the property can
shoot a hole through your head execution style and God himself would call it justice.
That said you do not get to shoot unarmed people for any reason no matter what they are doing or saying.
Shooting unarmed people can get you the automatic death penalty.
The same as if you sold illicit drugs that caused someone's death.
If you are too retarded to understand those laws then you shouldn't have a gun to begin with.
Retarded people like that should be under the constant supervision of handlers to keep them out of trouble.
