|
|
Post by Xeliou66 on May 3, 2023 23:30:16 GMT
Yeah I think it’s likely Epstein may have been working with Mossad to blackmail prominent figures. There isn’t anything Israel won’t do to advance its agenda, including facilitate child rape, after all, Jewish pedophiles have fled to Israel many times.
|
|
|
|
Post by kiwi on May 3, 2023 23:45:54 GMT
Epstein considered moving there back in 2008 or so to avoid prosecution in the U.S.
He was a big talker, a braggart, so I wouldn't take anything he said at face value.
|
|
|
|
Post by kiwi on May 3, 2023 23:52:15 GMT
De Capo Press, an imprint of Hatchette. Not exactly Knopf or any major press. Rolling Stone did an article on this a while ago. Lots of questions, few confirmations. |
|
|
|
Post by kiwi on May 3, 2023 23:58:27 GMT
Proud of it. Authoritative sources are everything. I don't trust junk. This all may be true, but if it is, I think it would have come out a long time ago. Aspects of it may be true, but much is speculation. |
|
|
|
Post by kiwi on May 4, 2023 0:30:04 GMT
Proud of it. Authoritative sources are everything. I don't trust junk. This all may be true, but if it is, I think it would have come out a long time ago. Aspects of it may be true, but much is speculation. What specific information do you have that the book or its publisher are junk? You think Mossad confidential sources and uses just come out? Poor review in Kirkus and no reviews in major reviewing publications. The book purports to be a bombshell, but if it were accurate, it would have gotten attention in The London Times, The New York Times Book Review, The New York Review of Books, etc. There are lots of sensationalist publications. If you don't know how to separate the wheat from the chaff, you're a sitting duck for this type of thing. |
|
|
|
Post by kiwi on May 4, 2023 3:38:19 GMT
www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/gordon-thomas/robert-maxwell-israels-superspy/Poor review in Kirkus and no reviews in major reviewing publications. The book purports to be a bombshell, but if it were accurate, it would have gotten attention in The London Times, The New York Times Book Review, The New York Review of Books, etc. There are lots of sensationalist publications. If you don't know how to separate the wheat from the chaff, you're a sitting duck for this type of thing. Lol, this rumor and reporting has been out there for a long time. It's open secret at this point. www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epsteins-sick-story-played-out-for-years-in-plain-sightAcosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. Yes, I already said it's old, and the key word is "rumor". It may be true, but nothing is confirmed. |
|
|
|
Post by kiwi on May 4, 2023 3:45:44 GMT
Yes, I already said it's old, and the key word is "rumor". It may be true, but nothing is confirmed. Of course it's alleged, the CIA and Mossad aren't going to hand over their files. They're not the only people who could confirm something. No one else has, though, other than hearsay. |
|
|
|
Post by papamihel on May 4, 2023 5:21:28 GMT
I think we should also consider the Nabiru connection.
|
|
