Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2018 20:24:47 GMT
If Trump gets reelected in 2020 Ivanka will be elected in 2024. You heard it here first guys. Shes brilliant. Shes running many things in the WH and is said to be a big part of Trumps accomplishments.
This is how a good political reputation is made. She can tout Trumps economic boost in just this first year as her own
Dow Jones is breaking records after 1 year. Obama never came close to this. People have more than a few bucks in their pockets now
I wouldnt want to be a democrat in those debates in 2020. Trumps record is going to eat them alive.
Could you imagine what someone will say.?
Trump: "The economy rose amazingly under my term- as high as when FDR was in office"
Dem candidate "well yeah but..........ummmmmm...... Russian Probe?"
|
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jan 20, 2018 20:34:05 GMT
That would be the case if that were true. But in actuality, that is opposite of the truth. Asians (Arabs are classified as Asian) have less unemployment per capita than any other race. And they are behind blacks and Latinos in criminal arrest per capita. In the UK, Muslims are the most unemployed religious demographic. They are 60% of France’s prison population. Find me one statistic from any European country which says that Muslims have lower rates of imprisonment or unemployment. I do not doubt that. But the United States vetted each Muslim immigrant and refugee closely. And there was a quota on how many could be let in. My understanding of what Europe did was open the doors and let all and any flow in freely and unabated. The United States provided jobs, schools, medical service and like minded guides to each Arab immigrant and refugee. Europe put all Muslim immigrant in refugee camps. And allowed the citizenry to discriminate against them. Breeding anger and contempt amongst them. That is a recipe for crime and terrorism. Our Arab immigrants and refugees are largely happy, comfortable and Americanized. Less potential for crime and terrorism. The American and European situations are different. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2018 20:49:11 GMT
In the UK, Muslims are the most unemployed religious demographic. They are 60% of France’s prison population. Find me one statistic from any European country which says that Muslims have lower rates of imprisonment or unemployment. I do not doubt that. But the United States vetted each Muslim immigrant and refugee closely. And there was a quota on how many could be let in. My understanding of what Europe did was open the doors and let all and any flow in freely and unabated. The United States provided jobs, schools, medical service and like minded guides to each Arab immigrant and refugee. Europe put all Muslim immigrant in refugee camps. And allowed the citizenry to discriminate against them. Breeding anger and contempt amongst them. That is a recipe for crime and terrorism. Our Arab immigrants and refugees are largely happy, comfortable and Americanized. Less potential for crime and terrorism. The American and European situations are different. The European Muslim problems extend beyond recent arrivals or even refugees. Grandchildren of Pakistanis invited to the UK in the 60s are also problems. There is a vast difference in the contribution the Sikhs have and Pakistanis have, and they come from the same reason. Islam is a problem. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2018 21:32:54 GMT
A silver (platinum?) spoon is not sufficient qualifications for being president. Why the hell is Ivanka allowed to occupy an office in the West Wing, advise the president and have access to secret talks - all while she is running her private business? I thought the Trump offspring were supposed to divest themselves of private business dealings (or have them overseen by others without their involvement) if they were to participate in government in any capacity. Ivanka is allowed to have a foot in both worlds at the same time and no one questions this. Why not? She seems like a nice person but I really doubt she has the foggiest notion of the realities of life of the average person. She lives in a sheltered, ideal world and does not have the business experience of her father. To even consider her running for president makes me laugh. And who the hell needs another political dynasty in this country, anyway?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2018 21:36:32 GMT
A silver (platinum?) spoon is not sufficient qualifications for being president. Why the hell is Ivanka allow to occupy an office in the West Wing, advise the president and have access to secret talks - all while she is running her private business? I thought the Trump offspring were supposed to divest themselves of private business dealings (or have them overseen by others without their involvement) if they were to participate in government in any capacity. Ivanka is allowed to have a foot in both worlds at the same time and no one questions this. Why not? She seems like a nice person but I really doubt she has the foggiest notion of the realities of life of the average person. She lives in a sheltered, ideal world and does not have the business experience of her father. To even consider her running for president makes me laugh. And who the hell needs another political dynasty in this country, anyway? Do you think she is just a pretty face? She attended Georgetown University for two years, then transferred to the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, from which she graduated cum laude with a bachelor's degree in economics in 2004. |
|
|
|
Post by ebuzzmiller on Jan 20, 2018 22:32:15 GMT
If Trump gets reelected in 2020 Ivanka will be elected in 2024. You heard it here first guys. Shes brilliant. Shes running many things in the WH and is said to be a big part of Trumps accomplishments. This is how a good political reputation is made. She can tout Trumps economic boost in just this first year as her own Dow Jones is breaking records after 1 year. Obama never came close to this. People have more than a few bucks in their pockets now I wouldnt want to be a democrat in those debates in 2020. Trumps record is going to eat them alive. Could you imagine what someone will say.? Trump: "The economy rose amazingly under my term- as high as when FDR was in office" Dem candidate "well yeah but..........ummmmmm...... Russian Probe?" Get her clit out of your mouth you fucking mouthbreather. |
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jan 20, 2018 23:12:55 GMT
I do not doubt that. But the United States vetted each Muslim immigrant and refugee closely. And there was a quota on how many could be let in. My understanding of what Europe did was open the doors and let all and any flow in freely and unabated. The United States provided jobs, schools, medical service and like minded guides to each Arab immigrant and refugee. Europe put all Muslim immigrant in refugee camps. And allowed the citizenry to discriminate against them. Breeding anger and contempt amongst them. That is a recipe for crime and terrorism. Our Arab immigrants and refugees are largely happy, comfortable and Americanized. Less potential for crime and terrorism. The American and European situations are different. The European Muslim problems extend beyond recent arrivals or even refugees. Grandchildren of Pakistanis invited to the UK in the 60s are also problems. There is a vast difference in the contribution the Sikhs have and Pakistanis have, and they come from the same reason. Islam is a problem. Yes, you guys (I am assuming you are European) have more problems with Muslims than we do. But reportedly, you guys have better health care. If you are European, are you happy with your health care system? |
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Jan 20, 2018 23:32:13 GMT
Why do we need to be tough on muslim immigration? Because racist xenophobic conservatives fear all Muslims hate everyone that is not a Muslim. And secretly want to kill everybody. Huh? That's not a reason to be tough on muslim immigration. That sounds like a reason to be tough on racist xenophobic conservatives. |
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jan 20, 2018 23:33:48 GMT
Because racist xenophobic conservatives fear all Muslims hate everyone that is not a Muslim. And secretly want to kill everybody. Huh? That's not a reason to be tough on muslim immigration. That sounds like a reason to be tough on racist xenophobic conservatives. That is what I keep saying. But the racist xenophobic conservatives disagree. |
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Jan 21, 2018 0:31:16 GMT
Huh? That's not a reason to be tough on muslim immigration. That sounds like a reason to be tough on racist xenophobic conservatives. That is what I keep saying. But the racist xenophobic conservatives disagree. Yeah well, you are naive. Many, MANY, muslims hate people who are not muslim. That's the simple truth of their religion. |
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jan 21, 2018 2:40:10 GMT
That is what I keep saying. But the racist xenophobic conservatives disagree. Yeah well, you are naive. Many, MANY, muslims hate people who are not muslim. That's the simple truth of their religion. And many more don't hate those of other religions. If their holy book is interpreted correctly. That is what the more intelligent and educated Muslims tell me. |
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Jan 21, 2018 12:14:11 GMT
And many more don't hate those of other religions. If their holy book is interpreted correctly. That is what the more intelligent and educated Muslims tell me. How can "kill non-believers" be interpreted as not hating people? Hmm, maybe killing and love go together in their minds. (I think those muslims are pulling your leg.) |
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Jan 21, 2018 17:44:04 GMT
And many more don't hate those of other religions. If their holy book is interpreted correctly. That is what the more intelligent and educated Muslims tell me. How can "kill non-believers" be interpreted as not hating people? Hmm, maybe killing and love go together in their minds. (I think those muslims are pulling your leg.) Well, I never studied the Koran. But Muslim scholars say the Koran does not say to kill non-believers. It says to kill the infidel invaders. And it also says it is wrong to hurt or kill anybody of any faith that is not a threat. Radical Muslims misinterpreted the Koran. They just quote the Koran when it says to kill the infidels. Not reading the context of the infidels being the infidel invaders. And they completely ignore the part where it says it is wrong to kill anyone who is not a threat. The radicals teach this misinformation to the followers who never read the Koran. |
|
|
|
Post by Flying Monkeys on Jan 21, 2018 18:26:43 GMT
Muslim scholars say the Koran does not say to kill non-believers. It says to kill the infidel invaders. And it also says it is wrong to hurt or kill anybody of any faith that is not a threat. Bollocks. Absolute bollocks. It commands muslims to invade other lands and convert them or kill them. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2018 18:52:20 GMT
"She attended Georgetown University for two years, then transferred to the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, from which she graduated cum laude with a bachelor's degree in economics in 2004."All well and good, but don't you think that her father's position may have had something to do with her educational opportunities? There are plenty of people who achieve just as much, and more, completely on their own. You never responded to the fact that she's allowed to be both a part of the administration, in effect, and still be allowed to run her business. One of the advantages of special privilege, perhaps, even though this clearly violates the rules that were prescribed when Trump took over the White House. I have nothing against Ivanka, but she certainly does not have to strive and struggle to get the best out of life. And, as I also said, who the hell needs another political dynasty in this country? We fought the Revolutionary War to rid ourselves of monarchy, and now we seem to hearken back to the "good olde days" and yearningly look to re-install that which we fought to get rid of. Despite some peoples' view, I don't think that monarchy (or politcal dynasty) is consistent with democracy. - politics should not be regarded as a "family business". I generally support Trump, but i also believe that out of 350 million people, there are certainly those more deserving (much more deserving) of high office than Trump's offspring, and they should be afforded the opportunity to apply their abilities and talents for the good of the nation. |
|
