Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2023 18:40:01 GMT
cat, please remove the pictures from your post. The board could be at risk. You can make your point without reposting the pics. Foxy on her game!!! Little admin, you. ❤️
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2023 18:50:07 GMT
Why? What happened to never forget? There must be a record of every act kept. As the last living witnesses to the concentration camps and the Holocaust die off, we must not stop remembering. I first saw these pictures when I was five-years-old, I will never forget. I believe the uncensored footage of the October 7th Hamas terrorist attack should have been shown on every television station in the world. And at every university.If the uncensored footage of the attack had of been shown to everybody there would be far, far less young people around the world supporting Hamas and their allies in Palestine.The bloody, uncensored footage of the combat in Vietnam that was shown on US television nightly was a good thing. People need to see the reality. Censoring the truth is never a good idea. Imagine a court case where the jurors and the judge were not allowed to view the bloodied pictures of a murder victim. The truth must out, always. In all its gory detail. SciFive , The bloody, uncensored footage of the combat in Vietnam that was shown on US television nightly was a good thing. People need to see the reality. Censoring the truth is never a good idea.
I couldn't agree more with that.
By all means, show pictures of killed Palestinians from this conflict on the news nightly. Festoon it with pictures of destroyed buildings and crying women and children. Please do. Make it the bloody, uncensored version of buildings with people in them being destroyed, family members digging each other out of rubble, and scores of bodies caked in blood and plaster on the streets. Censoring the truth is never a good idea. The truth must always come out. I'm all for your idea. I think it's a great idea. One of the best I've ever seen.
|
|
|
Post by jeffersoncody on Dec 10, 2023 20:07:57 GMT
jeffersoncody That first picture contains nudity. You best delete it. I shall ask Monkeys what he thinks mrself, I think context, like facts, is important. Flying Monkeys,
|
|
|
Post by mr_self on Dec 10, 2023 20:09:44 GMT
jeffersoncody That first picture contains nudity. You best delete it. I shall ask Monkeys what he thinks mrself, I think context, like facts, is important. Do what you must but I suspect full frontal male nudity will not be tolerated.
|
|
|
Post by jeffersoncody on Dec 10, 2023 20:25:23 GMT
I shall ask Monkeys what he thinks mrself, I think context, like facts, is important. Do what you must but I suspect full frontal male nudity will not be tolerated. Context. Am I seeing a display of American prurience at its worst here. There is nothing sexual about the picture, and genitals are barely visible. Did you and Foxy examine it with a magnifying glass and spot the shape of a penis? WTF. Flying Monkeys ,
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2023 20:30:20 GMT
Do what you must but I suspect full frontal male nudity will not be tolerated. Context. Am I seeing a display of American prurience at its worst here. There is nothing sexual about the picture, and genitals are barely visible. Did you and Foxy examine it with a microscope? WTF. Flying Monkeys , Rules are rules but frankly I agree with you. There's nothing sexual about it. Although I the point is made that if you go by the word of the law and not the intent then it could be a weaponizable image. If someone reports it then the system has no choice but to go through the gears. That's their caution. I edited it out of my response because I see their point/
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2023 20:33:11 GMT
Do what you must but I suspect full frontal male nudity will not be tolerated. [img class="smile" style="max-width:100%;" alt=" " src="http://storage.proboards.com/6870873/images/X0xvEuKqIvpjcwikdJVq.gif"] Context. Am I seeing a display of American prurience at its worst here. There is nothing sexual about the picture, and genitals are barely visible. Did you and Foxy examine it with a microscope? WTF. Flying Monkeys , I ask, is this really a hill you wanna die on?
|
|
|
Post by jeffersoncody on Dec 10, 2023 20:48:02 GMT
Context. Am I seeing a display of American prurience at its worst here. There is nothing sexual about the picture, and genitals are barely visible. Did you and Foxy examine it with a microscope? WTF. Flying Monkeys , I ask, is this really a hill you wanna die on? Why would asking the opinion of the Admin get me into trouble? If Flying Monkeys asks me to take it down I will.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2023 20:48:58 GMT
I ask, is this really a hill you wanna die on? Why would asking the opinion of the Admin get me into trouble? If Flying Monkeys asks me to take it down I will. Because, stuff like this can get an entire board taken down. You really wanna play Russian roulette?
|
|
|
Post by jeffersoncody on Dec 10, 2023 20:56:25 GMT
Why would asking the opinion of the Admin get me into trouble? If Flying Monkeys asks me to take it down I will. Because, stuff like this can get an entire board taken down. I do not for one fucking second believe that posting a picture of an historically authentic black and white photograph of a group of emaciated and starving Jewish prisoners in a German concentration during World War 11 can get this "entire board taken down" shady, you are being dramatic for the sake of being dramatic. Nobody had a problem almost naked women gyrating their buttock suggestively on the DBOTY thread. Admin
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2023 20:58:05 GMT
Because, stuff like this can get an entire board taken down. I do not for one fucking second believe that posting a picture of an historically authentic black and white photograph of a group of emaciated and starving Jewish prisoners in a German concentration during World War 11 can get this "entire board taken down" shady, you are being dramatic for the sake of being dramatic. Nobody had a problem almost naked women gyrating their buttock suggestively on the DBOTY thread. Admin 18. OBJECTIONABLE CONTENT You represent and warrant that you shall not use the Website or Services to upload, post, transmit, display, perform or distribute any content, information or materials that: (a) are libelous, defamatory, abusive, or threatening, excessively violent, harassing, obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or pornographic So, you're playing the "I don't find it that." Maybe you're right, maybe I am. So you wanna play Russian roulette, I can't stop you.
|
|
|
Post by jeffersoncody on Dec 10, 2023 21:18:31 GMT
I do not for one fucking second believe that posting a picture of an historically authentic black and white photograph of a group of emaciated and starving Jewish prisoners in a German concentration during World War 11 can get this "entire board taken down" shady, you are being dramatic for the sake of being dramatic. Nobody had a problem almost naked women gyrating their buttock suggestively on the DBOTY thread. Admin 18. OBJECTIONABLE CONTENT You represent and warrant that you shall not use the Website or Services to upload, post, transmit, display, perform or distribute any content, information or materials that: (a) are libelous, defamatory, abusive, or threatening, excessively violent, harassing, obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or pornographic I do not believe the picture I posted is libelous, defamatory, abusive, or threatening, excessively violent, harassing, obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or pornographic shady!
|
|
|
Post by jeffersoncody on Dec 10, 2023 21:40:38 GMT
Context. Am I seeing a display of American prurience at its worst here. There is nothing sexual about the picture, and genitals are barely visible. Did you and Foxy examine it with a microscope? WTF. Flying Monkeys , if you go by the word of the law and not the intent Going by the word of the Pro Board law cat, I don't believe there is anything libelous, defamatory, abusive, or threatening, excessively violent, harassing, obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or pornographic about the picture I posted.
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Dec 10, 2023 22:22:10 GMT
I do not for one fucking second believe that posting a picture of an historically authentic black and white photograph of a group of emaciated and starving Jewish prisoners in a German concentration during World War 11 can get this "entire board taken down" shady, you are being dramatic for the sake of being dramatic. Nobody had a problem almost naked women gyrating their buttock suggestively on the DBOTY thread. Admin 18. OBJECTIONABLE CONTENT You represent and warrant that you shall not use the Website or Services to upload, post, transmit, display, perform or distribute any content, information or materials that: (a) are libelous, defamatory, abusive, or threatening, excessively violent, harassing, obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or pornographic So, you're playing the "I don't find it that." Maybe you're right, maybe I am. So you wanna play Russian roulette, I can't stop you. Which of those do you think the post is guilty of?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2023 22:49:33 GMT
if you go by the word of the law and not the intent Going by the word of the Pro Board law cat, I don't believe there is anything libelous, defamatory, abusive, or threatening, excessively violent, harassing, obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or pornographic about the picture I posted. The word of the law is what people use against you when it fails to meet the criteria of intent. I don't personally feel any of those terms are violated, but I'm not the moral barometer of the board. I'm taking it on goodwill that it is problematic enough to ruffle the feathers of censorship, and as a member of this board these are the terms I agreed with to be here.
I'd rather you defend its relevance to the topic at hand, because it looks to me like it was brought up in the name of competing one set of victims over another. It looks to me like at worst it's a distraction, but at best, it raises the bar to the level of the people in the photo and says if this isn't you then you're not oppressed, and I think that's wrong. It demeans the value of the people in the photo to weaponize their experience to steal attention away from alleged war crimes happening now. It's not relevant to the subject, in my opinion, and no one, let alone me, is going to push back against their experience, but this is not the same conflict, and if you're trying to argue Israel can't be culpable for what it's doing because its ancestors had this inflicted on them, you're wrong.
|
|