|
Post by jeffersoncody on Dec 10, 2023 23:21:09 GMT
The word of the law is what people use against you when it fails to meet the criteria of intent. I don't personally feel any of those terms are violated, but I'm not the moral barometer of the board. I'm taking it on goodwill that it is problematic enough to ruffle the feathers of censorship, and as a member of this board these are the terms I agreed with to be here.
I'd rather you defend its relevance to the topic at hand, because it looks to me like it was brought up in the name of competing one set of victims over another. It looks to me like at worst it's a distraction, but at best, it raises the bar to the level of the people in the photo and says if this isn't you then you're not oppressed, and I think that's wrong. It demeans the value of the people in the photo to weaponize their experience to steal attention away from alleged war crimes happening now. It's not relevant to the subject, in my opinion, and no one, let alone me, is going to push back against their experience, but this is not the same conflict, and if you're trying to argue Israel can't be culpable for what it's doing because its ancestors had this inflicted on them, you're wrong.
I stand behind Israel 100%, my support of them as they fight for their very existence is unconditional and absolute cat. There is no moral equivalency between Israel's aims and the aims of Hamas, none whatsoever. And fuck off with calling stripping down to their underwear a bunch of dangerous prisoners known for concealing bombs and weapons an "alleged" war crime. It not a war crime in any form or fashion. I hope I have made clear to you how I feel.
averagejoe2021,SciFive,mr_self,Foxy, NoRevisionism, The Trashcan Man, gwyn
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2023 0:01:54 GMT
18. OBJECTIONABLE CONTENT You represent and warrant that you shall not use the Website or Services to upload, post, transmit, display, perform or distribute any content, information or materials that: (a) are libelous, defamatory, abusive, or threatening, excessively violent, harassing, obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or pornographic So, you're playing the "I don't find it that." Maybe you're right, maybe I am. So you wanna play Russian roulette, I can't stop you. Which of those do you think the post is guilty of? Pornography. Do I find it offensive? Fuck no, jeffersoncody is making a point. I get the point. Will others see it my way? Idk, I can't answer that. I also believe in "better safe than sorry."
|
|
|
Post by SciFive on Dec 11, 2023 0:05:43 GMT
The stripping to underwear was necessary to check for weapons, says Israel, but the photos won’t happen again.
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Dec 11, 2023 0:19:11 GMT
Which of those do you think the post is guilty of? Pornography. Do I find it offensive? Fuck no, jeffersoncody is making a point. I get the point. Will others see it my way? Idk, I can't answer that. I also believe in "better safe than sorry." I don't think you know what that words means. Or you are a very sick individual.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2023 0:20:48 GMT
Pornography. Do I find it offensive? Fuck no, jeffersoncody is making a point. I get the point. Will others see it my way? Idk, I can't answer that. I also believe in "better safe than sorry." I don't think you know what that words means. Or you are a very sick individual. I guess you gotta call Foxy and mr_self that too.
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Dec 11, 2023 0:21:52 GMT
I don't think you know what that words means. Or you are a very sick individual. I guess you gotta call Foxy and mr_self that too. If they think showing naked holocaust survivors is porn, then I will.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2023 0:23:09 GMT
|
|
|
Post by The Trashcan Man on Dec 11, 2023 0:27:23 GMT
The word of the law is what people use against you when it fails to meet the criteria of intent. I don't personally feel any of those terms are violated, but I'm not the moral barometer of the board. I'm taking it on goodwill that it is problematic enough to ruffle the feathers of censorship, and as a member of this board these are the terms I agreed with to be here.
I'd rather you defend its relevance to the topic at hand, because it looks to me like it was brought up in the name of competing one set of victims over another. It looks to me like at worst it's a distraction, but at best, it raises the bar to the level of the people in the photo and says if this isn't you then you're not oppressed, and I think that's wrong. It demeans the value of the people in the photo to weaponize their experience to steal attention away from alleged war crimes happening now. It's not relevant to the subject, in my opinion, and no one, let alone me, is going to push back against their experience, but this is not the same conflict, and if you're trying to argue Israel can't be culpable for what it's doing because its ancestors had this inflicted on them, you're wrong.
I stand behind Israel 100%, my support of them as they fight for their very existence is unconditional and absolute cat. There is no moral equivalency between Israel's aims and the aims of Hamas, none whatsoever. And fuck off with calling stripping down to their underwear a bunch of dangerous prisoners known for concealing bombs and weapons an "alleged" war crime. It not a war crime in any form or fashion. I hope I have made clear to you how I feel.
averagejoe2021 ,SciFive ,mr_self ,Foxy , NoRevisionism , The Trashcan Man , gwyn
^^this^^
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Dec 11, 2023 0:27:42 GMT
They said nudity, not pornography. They are not the same thing. Nudity is not specifically against the terms.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2023 0:28:53 GMT
They said nudity, not pornography. They are not the same thing. Nudity is not specifically against the terms. Okay, idc either way. Touche, you win this one. This ain't a hill I wanna die on. Keep it up, I'll keep going.
|
|
|
Post by mr_self on Dec 11, 2023 0:32:37 GMT
They said nudity, not pornography. They are not the same thing. Nudity is not specifically against the terms. But obscene images are. And many people believe full frontal male nudity is obscene. Will ProBoards? I don't know but I personally don't think it is worth the risk. Link to the image at a minimum. IMO.
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Dec 11, 2023 0:34:28 GMT
They said nudity, not pornography. They are not the same thing. Nudity is not specifically against the terms. But obscene images are. And many people believe full frontal male nudity is obscene. Will ProBoards? I don't know but I personally don't think it is worth the risk. Link to the image at a minimum. IMO. Not really. If they do they have lost the plot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2023 0:36:22 GMT
But obscene images are. And many people believe full frontal male nudity is obscene. Will ProBoards? I don't know but I personally don't think it is worth the risk. Link to the image at a minimum. IMO. [img class="smile" src="http://storage.proboards.com/6870873/images/X0xvEuKqIvpjcwikdJVq.gif" alt=" "] Not really. If they do they have lost the plot. My bad for saying pornography, should have said nudity. Apologize for my error.
|
|
|
Post by mr_self on Dec 11, 2023 0:42:44 GMT
But obscene images are. And many people believe full frontal male nudity is obscene. Will ProBoards? I don't know but I personally don't think it is worth the risk. Link to the image at a minimum. IMO. Not really. If they do they have lost the plot. Take a look around, mate. The world isn't all that rational anymore. Expecting ProBoards to be isn't worth the risk. IMO.
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Dec 11, 2023 0:55:01 GMT
Not really. If they do they have lost the plot. My bad for saying pornography, should have said nudity. Apologize for my error. No apology required, it just baffled me. The posts in DBOTY are porn by definition, Americans just seem hung up on nudity.
|
|