|
|
Post by weststigersbob on Jan 2, 2024 5:58:50 GMT
Well, he does turn 17 in a week or so. That being said, this fat fuck looked very much like he did when he was 16, except my beard was more blond. My son however, had me and Master Littler very much covered in the beard stakes as a 16 year old and his was brown/black. Its obvious (to me anyway) he is still pretty young - he hasn’t “filled out” yet in his shoulders like a man, and still has a fair amount of “puppy fat” around his arms and face. |
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Jan 2, 2024 8:19:31 GMT
Well, he does turn 17 in a week or so. That being said, this fat fuck looked very much like he did when he was 16, except my beard was more blond. My son however, had me and Master Littler very much covered in the beard stakes as a 16 year old and his was brown/black. Its obvious (to me anyway) he is still pretty young - he hasn’t “filled out” yet in his shoulders like a man, and still has a fair amount of “puppy fat” around his arms and face. No 16 year old looks like that. If you looked liked that at 16 too then your parents should have had you exorcized. |
|
|
|
Post by weststigersbob on Jan 2, 2024 8:48:30 GMT
Well, he does turn 17 in a week or so. That being said, this fat fuck looked very much like he did when he was 16, except my beard was more blond. My son however, had me and Master Littler very much covered in the beard stakes as a 16 year old and his was brown/black. Its obvious (to me anyway) he is still pretty young - he hasn’t “filled out” yet in his shoulders like a man, and still has a fair amount of “puppy fat” around his arms and face. No 16 year old looks like that. If you looked liked that at 16 too then your parents should have had you exorcized. Like me, my parents had the good sense to not let a priest go anywhere near their kids. And fuck you for saying my child looks like they need a demon pulled out of them. |
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Jan 2, 2024 8:58:26 GMT
No 16 year old looks like that. If you looked liked that at 16 too then your parents should have had you exorcized. Like me, my parents had the good sense to not let a priest go anywhere near their kids. And fuck you for saying my child looks like they need a demon pulled out of them. He looks that bad that he needs a potential paedophile to help him. You're the one that brought your child into the discussion don't remember caring what your child looks like. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2024 10:11:07 GMT
He was probably born old. When I was at school there was a boy in my year who looked and acted like a tired middle aged man. |
|
|
|
Post by weststigersbob on Jan 2, 2024 12:11:55 GMT
Like me, my parents had the good sense to not let a priest go anywhere near their kids. And fuck you for saying my child looks like they need a demon pulled out of them. He looks that bad that he needs a potential paedophile to help him. You're the one that brought your child into the discussion don't remember caring what your child looks like. Your original quote : ”No 16 year old looks like that. If you looked liked that at 16 too then your parents should have had you exorcized.” By referring to fact that I should have been exorcised because of my looks, you inferred that my son should also been exorcised because he too looked like I did (and by extension Luke Littler) when he was 16. You’ve now doubled down with a dumb remark about paedophilia. Obvious where your morals lie - you think about exorcisms and paedophiles in the front of your mind, whilst talking about children. |
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Jan 2, 2024 12:17:30 GMT
He looks that bad that he needs a potential paedophile to help him. You're the one that brought your child into the discussion don't remember caring what your child looks like. Your original quote : ”No 16 year old looks like that. If you looked liked that at 16 too then your parents should have had you exorcized.” By referring to fact that I should have been exorcised because of my looks, you inferred that my son should also been exorcised because he too looked like I did (and by extension Luke Littler) when he was 16. You’ve now doubled down with a dumb remark about paedophilia. Obvious where your morals lie - you think about exorcisms and paedophiles in the front of your mind, whilst talking about children. You said a priest wouldn't be anywhere near your son because of you thinking they would be paedophiles some stupid gotcha of yours or why else wouldn't you let a priest look at your son, yourself and Luke for not looking like a normal 16 year old? |
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Jan 2, 2024 12:21:07 GMT
He was probably born old. When I was at school there was a boy in my year who looked and acted like a tired middle aged man. Luke Littler isn't acting like a tired middle aged man he looks like an unhealthy 60 year old man. |
|
|
|
Post by weststigersbob on Jan 2, 2024 12:56:52 GMT
Your original quote : ”No 16 year old looks like that. If you looked liked that at 16 too then your parents should have had you exorcized.” By referring to fact that I should have been exorcised because of my looks, you inferred that my son should also been exorcised because he too looked like I did (and by extension Luke Littler) when he was 16. You’ve now doubled down with a dumb remark about paedophilia. Obvious where your morals lie - you think about exorcisms and paedophiles in the front of your mind, whilst talking about children. You said a priest wouldn't be anywhere near your son because of you thinking they would be paedophiles some stupid gotcha of yours or why else wouldn't you let a priest look at your son, yourself and Luke for not looking like a normal 16 year old? I never said priests were paedophiles. I said that my parents had the good sense to not let a priest anywhere near me - because they, like me, are atheists and don’t believe that exorcisms do anything. You however, do believe that they do something, and that 16 year old boys that look older than average should have one performed on them. Once again, it’s says a lot about your morality and your thoughts that you’d think that. Just like commenting several times, maliciously, about the appearance of a 16 year old boy….. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2024 12:58:04 GMT
He was probably born old. When I was at school there was a boy in my year who looked and acted like a tired middle aged man. Luke Littler isn't acting like a tired middle aged man he looks like an unhealthy 60 year old man. I’d say he looks like an unhealthy man in his late 30s early 40s. |
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Jan 2, 2024 13:10:21 GMT
You said a priest wouldn't be anywhere near your son because of you thinking they would be paedophiles some stupid gotcha of yours or why else wouldn't you let a priest look at your son, yourself and Luke for not looking like a normal 16 year old? I never said priests were paedophiles. I said that my parents had the good sense to not let a priest anywhere near me - because they, like me, are atheists and don’t believe that exorcisms do anything. You however, do believe that they do something, and that 16 year old boys that look older than average should have one performed on them. Once again, it’s says a lot about your morality and your thoughts that you’d think that. Just like commenting several times, maliciously, about the appearance of a 16 year old boy….. The priest thing was a joke if you look like that at 16 no one can help you not even being an atheist. Counselling is the most realistic option. Luke isn't reading the board any comments about him he won't no exists and if he is aware then he needs to change that medically. |
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Jan 2, 2024 13:11:11 GMT
Luke Littler isn't acting like a tired middle aged man he looks like an unhealthy 60 year old man. I’d say he looks like an unhealthy man in his late 30s early 40s. Early 50s and that's being nice. |
|
|
|
Post by Carl LaFong on Jan 2, 2024 21:31:48 GMT
He's in the final now ... just beat Rob Cross 6 sets to 2!
16 x 180's and a 106.05 three dart average.
Go Luke!
He's got a 21 year old smasher of a girlfriend too! (Well, she's 21 anyway ... didn't get a right look at her.)
|
|
|
|
Post by Carl LaFong on Jan 2, 2024 22:33:52 GMT
In the other semi, Humphries in slaughtering Williams.
It’s 4-0 and H is averaging 109 a throw!
|
|
|
|
Post by Carl LaFong on Jan 2, 2024 22:56:45 GMT
Luke Humphries won his semi 6-0 … made 60% of his checkouts.
So it’s the battle of the Lukes in the final.
I make Humphries favourite, but it should be a great spectacle!
|
|
