|
|
Post by Harold of Whoa on Feb 2, 2018 1:48:56 GMT
Now, she wasn't a very good shot, seemingly, because of the lack of fatalities (one boy shot in the head but alive, one girl in the hand), but that is incidental. The great disturbance in The Force in this case is that a 12 year old female is in custody for the school shooting!!! I can only assume, at this point, that she is a cis-gender bio-female, but we shall see. My question to this august company is this: How fast will this girl's lawyer gin up a story that she is a #metoo-er who was sexually harassed at school and forced into this drastic action? In fact, would it not be legal malpractice worthy of disbarment if her lawyer didn't steer her toward a sexual harassment defense, which will give her a high probability of going free long before her Quinceañera? www.cbsnews.com/news/california-shooting-salvador-castro-middle-school-today-2018-02-01/ |
|
|
|
Post by slowcomingwarbird on Feb 2, 2018 3:35:22 GMT
Supposedly "Slender Man" told her to do it.
And so she ends up getting 40 years in a mental institution.
It should be pretty obvious that you don't put 12 year olds and 16 year olds in the same room together.
Although that wasn't the reason, more like those under the age of 18 shouldn't be using the internet.
Mostly because kids of that age are too young to sort out the dangers of "4chan" and other terrorist groups.
|
|
|
|
Post by kls on Feb 2, 2018 13:21:26 GMT
Now, she wasn't a very good shot, seemingly, because of the lack of fatalities (one boy shot in the head but alive, one girl in the hand), but that is incidental. The great disturbance in The Force in this case is that a 12 year old female is in custody for the school shooting!!! I can only assume, at this point, that she is a cis-gender bio-female, but we shall see. My question to this august company is this: How fast will this girl's lawyer gin up a story that she is a #metoo-er who was sexually harassed at school and forced into this drastic action? In fact, would it not be legal malpractice worthy of disbarment if her lawyer didn't steer her toward a sexual harassment defense, which will give her a high probability of going free long before her Quinceañera? www.cbsnews.com/news/california-shooting-salvador-castro-middle-school-today-2018-02-01/If it happened to be the truth it might be malpractice to not try to steer her towards it. But if it isn't it would be for a lawyer to encourage a client to make something up. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2018 13:39:18 GMT
I read in an earlier article that five shots were fired.
Two hits out of five rounds fired is not bad in a live...situation.
|
|
|
|
Post by slowcomingwarbird on Feb 2, 2018 20:43:54 GMT
Now, she wasn't a very good shot, seemingly, because of the lack of fatalities (one boy shot in the head but alive, one girl in the hand), but that is incidental. The great disturbance in The Force in this case is that a 12 year old female is in custody for the school shooting!!! I can only assume, at this point, that she is a cis-gender bio-female, but we shall see. My question to this august company is this: How fast will this girl's lawyer gin up a story that she is a #metoo-er who was sexually harassed at school and forced into this drastic action? In fact, would it not be legal malpractice worthy of disbarment if her lawyer didn't steer her toward a sexual harassment defense, which will give her a high probability of going free long before her Quinceañera? www.cbsnews.com/news/california-shooting-salvador-castro-middle-school-today-2018-02-01/Right in line with my theory that people are people no matter what gender. Meaning that a biological female can kill just as effectively as a biological male can. But with the difference that women tend to be less trigger happy than men, meaning fewer wasted shots. At least in the context of how it applies to this discussion. As to the rest of it, men and woman all basically like the same things with the differences in food and hobby preferences being so slight as to be hardly worth noting at all. |
|
|
|
Post by scienceisgod on Feb 3, 2018 0:16:00 GMT
Was she menstruating?
|
|
|
|
Post by Harold of Whoa on Feb 3, 2018 4:32:41 GMT
If it happened to be the truth it might be malpractice to not try to steer her towards it. But if it isn't it would be for a lawyer to encourage a client to make something up. That seems a little naive to me. When I say "gin up" I don't mean literally fabricate out of thin air. I'm just talking about taking advantage of the present cultural moment. Under current understanding of sexual harassment, middle school is pretty much 3 years of sexual harassment for every child there. Jokes and comments are sexual harassment, online slut-shaming is sexual harassment, asking someone out in front of their friends (where they may not feel they can say no) is, no doubt, a form of sexual harassment. If you are a lawyer and you don't want to commit unethical conduct, here, you just don't even give your client a chance to tell you "I shot Ramone because I was mad that he was seeing Deshondre, and I shot her, too." You just steer her recollection before she ever tells you what happened. "Has anyone at school ever made you feel uncomfortable? Has anyone ever touched you? You felt powerless when he touched you, didn't you?" Boom, harassment case, and that made her feel powerless, and a gun was her only voice. Not guilty. That'll be $20,000, please. Anyway, I think it is moot. I heard on the radio today that the authorities are calling it "accidental", so it is the gun's fault. If WVB is correct that there were five shots, that is some amazing accidentalness, comic-level accidentalness. Hoofah. |
|
