|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Apr 23, 2024 20:48:51 GMT
💦💦💦💦
|
|
|
Post by Fetzer Zinfandel ♀︎ on Apr 23, 2024 22:58:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Fetzer Zinfandel ♀︎ on Apr 23, 2024 23:16:27 GMT
maga was behind much of this bullshit. No surprise.
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Apr 24, 2024 0:23:03 GMT
New York Election Law 17-152 is the predicate crime. What are the "unlawful means"?
|
|
|
Post by Fetzer Zinfandel ♀︎ on Apr 24, 2024 0:27:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Apr 24, 2024 0:27:55 GMT
This seems like a federal/state pre-emption problem waiting to happen. Yep, this is (according to the experts) the unresolved legal question. And I've gathered that both sides can be plausibly argued. That's why I (a non-lawyer) was thinking that Trump could easily be convicted by a jury that is focused on the facts of the case, but that the real battle takes place on the appeals level, where it's not the facts, but the law on preemption that gets argued over. And Trump's conviction could well be overturned on that basis. Do you think that maybe you shouldn't be testing out bizarre legal theories on candidates in order to interfere with democratic elections?
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Apr 24, 2024 0:31:16 GMT
Because they are the truth, and CNN lied. The articles that call the trial a sham mention the non-credible witnesses Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels as being part of the reason the trial is a sham. Trump linked to the article, and Bragg is arguing that is a violation of the [unconstitutional] gag order because the potential witnesses were mentioned therein.
Why do you continue to read CNN when they tell you verifiable lies?
|
|
|
Post by mr_self on Apr 24, 2024 0:34:02 GMT
New York Election Law 17-152 is the predicate crime. What are the "unlawful means"? How tf should I know? Send your questions to the NY DA or someone that gives a shit. I already told you that I think this case is weak af.
|
|
|
Post by jeffersoncody on Apr 24, 2024 0:40:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Fetzer Zinfandel ♀︎ on Apr 24, 2024 21:53:07 GMT
OUCH
|
|
|
Post by dlancer on Apr 24, 2024 22:05:00 GMT
Sex with a porn star.
A guy named Pecker.
Farting in the courtroom.
Only in the US.
|
|
|
Post by dlancer on Apr 24, 2024 22:13:46 GMT
Because they are the truth, and CNN lied. The articles that call the trial a sham mention the non-credible witnesses Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels as being part of the reason the trial is a sham. Trump linked to the article, and Bragg is arguing that is a violation of the [unconstitutional] gag order because the potential witnesses were mentioned therein.
Why do you continue to read CNN when they tell you verifiable lies? He was told not to speak about the witnesses, which includes linking to articles smearing the witnesses.
All he has to do is leave the witnesses out of it.
Also don't forget he's claiming all this stuff helps him, which means he's probably doing it on purpose despite knowing he's not supposed to.
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Apr 24, 2024 22:52:54 GMT
Because they are the truth, and CNN lied. The articles that call the trial a sham mention the non-credible witnesses Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels as being part of the reason the trial is a sham. Trump linked to the article, and Bragg is arguing that is a violation of the [unconstitutional] gag order because the potential witnesses were mentioned therein.
Why do you continue to read CNN when they tell you verifiable lies? He was told not to speak about the witnesses, which includes linking to articles smearing the witnesses.
All he has to do is leave the witnesses out of it.
Also don't forget he's claiming all this stuff helps him, which means he's probably doing it on purpose despite knowing he's not supposed to.
So you agree with me that CNN and Fetzer just lied, right?
"Facts First: As he has before, Trump made Merchan’s gag order sound far broader than it is. The gag order does not prohibit Trump from declaring the case a sham or from sharing others’ claims that the case is a sham."
The articles that call the trial a sham will always mention the non-credible witnesses (and proven liars) Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels as being part of the reason the trial is a sham.
|
|
|
Post by dlancer on Apr 24, 2024 22:58:32 GMT
He was told not to speak about the witnesses, which includes linking to articles smearing the witnesses.
All he has to do is leave the witnesses out of it.
Also don't forget he's claiming all this stuff helps him, which means he's probably doing it on purpose despite knowing he's not supposed to.
So you agree with me that CNN and Fetzer just lied, right?
"Facts First: As he has before, Trump made Merchan’s gag order sound far broader than it is. The gag order does not prohibit Trump from declaring the case a sham or from sharing others’ claims that the case is a sham."
The articles that call the trial a sham will always mention the non-credible witnesses (and proven liars) Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels as being part of the reason the trial is a sham.
He's allowed to cite articles that call the trial a sham.
He's not allowed to cite articles that call the witnesses a sham.
Even someone as dumb as bricks as you are should know the difference between a trial and witnesses.
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Apr 24, 2024 23:13:53 GMT
So you agree with me that CNN and Fetzer just lied, right?
"Facts First: As he has before, Trump made Merchan’s gag order sound far broader than it is. The gag order does not prohibit Trump from declaring the case a sham or from sharing others’ claims that the case is a sham."
The articles that call the trial a sham will always mention the non-credible witnesses (and proven liars) Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels as being part of the reason the trial is a sham.
He's allowed to cite articles that call the trial a sham.
He's not allowed to cite articles that call the witnesses a sham.
Even someone as dumb as bricks as you are should know the difference between a trial and witnesses.
Which articles about this case don't mention Michael Cohen or Stormy Daniels?
Do you realize how retarded you are?
|
|