|
|
Post by mikemonger on Apr 19, 2024 14:55:42 GMT
I am a firm supporter of the second amendment. No, I don't think people on psychotropic drugs should have guns. |
|
|
|
Post by TheGoodMan19 on Apr 19, 2024 14:59:27 GMT
I'm a strong supporter of 2B
or not 2B
That's the question
|
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Apr 19, 2024 15:28:40 GMT
You will NEVER get an honest conversation out of a gun nut. Their priority is the guns.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 19, 2024 15:40:54 GMT
You will NEVER get an honest conversation out of a gun nut. Their priority is the guns. Are you a strong supporter of 2A? |
|
|
|
Post by darkramj on Apr 19, 2024 15:41:13 GMT
You will NEVER get an honest conversation out of a gun nut. Their priority is the guns. Because criminals and tyrannies have them...honest people having them is more than a priority, it's a necessity. |
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Apr 19, 2024 16:34:09 GMT
You will NEVER get an honest conversation out of a gun nut. Their priority is the guns. Are you a strong supporter of 2A? Right to bear arms within reason. |
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Apr 19, 2024 16:34:51 GMT
You will NEVER get an honest conversation out of a gun nut. Their priority is the guns. , it's a necessity. The only thing this mindset has gotten us is more dead people. More guns = more deaths. |
|
|
|
Post by cts1 on Apr 19, 2024 16:37:46 GMT
The NRA is a grift thinly disguised as an advocacy group. So, the sooner there are serious people on the 2A advocacy side, the better.
If the Govt wasn't trying to infringe non-stop............there'd be no reason or excuse to grift
Define "infringe." And unless you advocate the legalization of howitzers, don't pretend that you are a 2A "absolutist." |
|
|
|
Post by darkramj on Apr 19, 2024 16:38:30 GMT
Because criminals and tyrannies have them...honest people having them is more than a priority, it's a necessity. The only thing this mindset has gotten us is more dead people. More guns = more deaths. More than what? More than if we had just prevented law-abiding citizens from having the means to defend themselves? No. That's a lie. Gun violence has only increased with the vendetta against private and responsible ownership. |
|
|
|
Post by darkramj on Apr 19, 2024 16:39:23 GMT
If the Govt wasn't trying to infringe non-stop............there'd be no reason or excuse to grift
Define "infringe." And unless you advocate the legalization of howitzers, don't pretend that you are a 2A "absolutist." Are you making the Joe Biden "You can't own a cannon" argument? |
|
|
|
Post by cts1 on Apr 19, 2024 16:47:27 GMT
Define "infringe." And unless you advocate the legalization of howitzers, don't pretend that you are a 2A "absolutist." Are you making the Joe Biden "You can't own a cannon" argument? It isn't a fucking Joe Biden argument. It is a National Firearms Act of 1934 argument, as amended by the Gun Control Act of 1968 argument. The NRA supported the 1934 Act, by the way. Your point? |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 19, 2024 16:51:07 GMT
Are you a strong supporter of 2A? Right to bear arms within reason. I'm glad you feel that way, because all of my firearms are within reason. |
|
|
|
Post by darkramj on Apr 19, 2024 16:54:49 GMT
Are you making the Joe Biden "You can't own a cannon" argument? It isn't a fucking Joe Biden argument. It is a National Firearms Act of 1934 argument, as amended by the Gun Control Act of 1968 argument. The NRA supported the 1934 Act, by the way. Your point? My point is that taking the term 'absolutist' to it's literal extreme to question the individual's stance to avoid discussing the issue is objectively weak, counselor. |
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Apr 19, 2024 17:00:15 GMT
The only thing this mindset has gotten us is more dead people. More guns = more deaths. More than what? More than if we had just prevented law-abiding citizens from having the means to defend themselves? No. That's a lie. Gun violence has only increased with the vendetta against private and responsible ownership.Speaking of lies.... |
|
|
|
Post by cts1 on Apr 19, 2024 17:02:30 GMT
It isn't a fucking Joe Biden argument. It is a National Firearms Act of 1934 argument, as amended by the Gun Control Act of 1968 argument. The NRA supported the 1934 Act, by the way. Your point? My point is that taking the term 'absolutist' to it's literal extreme to question the individual's stance to avoid discussing the issue is objectively weak, counselor. Well, abbey1227 invited the issue by complaining about government infringement without any context as to the what is and is not a legitimate government infringement. |
|
