|
Post by maninasuitcase on Apr 24, 2024 11:01:33 GMT
He's a fucking idiot and so are you. Do you feel the virtue flowing through you? Or do you need to hate even harder? You really are pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Apr 24, 2024 11:05:18 GMT
Do you feel the virtue flowing through you? Or do you need to hate even harder? You really are pathetic. Keep going. It's important to me that you feel virtuous. Let your hatred flow through you.
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Apr 24, 2024 11:06:34 GMT
Keep going. It's important to me that you feel virtuous. Let your hatred flow through you. This ain't the the hill to die on, chief.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Apr 24, 2024 11:07:11 GMT
Keep going. It's important to me that you feel virtuous. Let your hatred flow through you. This ain't the the hill to die on, chief.
His hate might be powerful.. but I don't think it's going to kill me.
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Apr 24, 2024 11:17:33 GMT
In the White House not out of the White House you illiterate. Learn to read.
|
|
|
Post by Olaf Plunket on Apr 24, 2024 11:30:41 GMT
All the mechanics of "evolution" can be found in the Bible. There is the story of Jacob tending Laban's flocks in the Bible in Genesis 30:31 to Genesis 31:13. Jacob gives "natural selection" some help though. He puts spotted tree bark in the watering trough so that the sheep will associate their cool drink with spots. That somehow makes the females prefer spotted males. Since Jacob made a deal with Laban whereby Jacob gets the spotted animals, that increases Jacob's take over the years. In fact people had been breeding plants and animals more or less wittingly for centuries before that Bible passage was written. Some people think Darwin "invented" it. Obviously he did not. The real scientific issue has never been whether those mechanics of evolution can operate to make changes in already living organisms over time. The real issue has been how life could begin in the first place. Somewhat reasonably intelligent people, at one time anyway, liked to believe the mechanics of evolution could be extended to explain the origin itself of life. That of course was when people had rather simplistic notion of life. A century and a half later it is apparent that will never happen. Among other problems is that before life begins the smaller molecules have the competitive advantage over the larger molecules. Somehow despite all this, large numbers of the public continue to believe that people who actually read the Bible must deny evolution, and people who like science must continue to hope, against what they can can plainly see in the lab, that life could begin by the mechanics of evolution from lifeless matter. Even Darwin never said it would. That is because most Democrats, the Trump followers, and others are too plain stupid to follow the real issues. It does not matter what you think though. The truth will at last come out. There is nothing you can do to stop it.
|
|
|
Post by Olaf Plunket on Apr 24, 2024 11:47:59 GMT
Doesn't Rogan himself pushes fringe theories on his podcast? They deserve eachother. Idiots. Truth be told. Anyway ... Which theory is closer to the fringe? That Jesus rose from the "dead" or That life arose when lightning struck mud? Considering that Jesus had no damage to his heart, lungs, or brain and was probably in what we today would call a "coma" the notion that life began from totally lifeless matter is the more "fringe" idea.
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Apr 24, 2024 11:48:21 GMT
All the mechanics of "evolution" can be found in the Bible.
None of the mechanics of evolution can be found in the bible. Breeding is not evolution by natural selection.
|
|
|
Post by Olaf Plunket on Apr 24, 2024 11:59:53 GMT
All the mechanics of "evolution" can be found in the Bible.
None of the mechanics of evolution can be found in the bible. Breeding is not evolution by natural selection.
I doubt anyone is really that stupid ^^^
What Jacob did could easily have occurred in "nature."
|
|
|
Post by Winter_King on Apr 24, 2024 12:03:31 GMT
All the mechanics of "evolution" can be found in the Bible. There is the story of Jacob tending Laban's flocks in the Bible in Genesis 30:31 to Genesis 31:13. Jacob gives "natural selection" some help though. He puts spotted tree bark in the watering trough so that the sheep will associate their cool drink with spots. That somehow makes the females prefer spotted males. Since Jacob made a deal with Laban whereby Jacob gets the spotted animals, that increases Jacob's take over the years. In fact people had been breeding plants and animals more or less wittingly for centuries before that Bible passage was written. Some people think Darwin "invented" it. Obviously he did not. The real scientific issue has never been whether those mechanics of evolution can operate to make changes in already living organisms over time. The real issue has been how life could begin in the first place. Somewhat reasonably intelligent people, at one time anyway, liked to believe the mechanics of evolution could be extended to explain the origin itself of life. That of course was when people had rather simplistic notion of life. A century and a half later it is apparent that will never happen. Among other problems is that before life begins the smaller molecules have the competitive advantage over the larger molecules. Somehow despite all this, large numbers of the public continue to believe that people who actually read the Bible must deny evolution, and people who like science must continue to hope, against what they can can plainly see in the lab, that life could begin by the mechanics of evolution from lifeless matter. Even Darwin never said it would. That is because most Democrats, the Trump followers, and others are too plain stupid to follow the real issues. It does not matter what you think though. The truth will at last come out. There is nothing you can do to stop it. I never heard anyone saying that Darwin "invented" evolution. There is a question about how life originated but that's not evolution. That's just abiogenesis.
|
|
|
Post by dlancer on Apr 24, 2024 12:08:46 GMT
He's gone full Alex Jones.
Like Jones, he needs the "I don't trust anything I can't verify myself" crowd to sell his conspiracy theories to.
|
|
|
Post by Olaf Plunket on Apr 24, 2024 12:15:50 GMT
All the mechanics of "evolution" can be found in the Bible. There is the story of Jacob tending Laban's flocks in the Bible in Genesis 30:31 to Genesis 31:13. Jacob gives "natural selection" some help though. He puts spotted tree bark in the watering trough so that the sheep will associate their cool drink with spots. That somehow makes the females prefer spotted males. Since Jacob made a deal with Laban whereby Jacob gets the spotted animals, that increases Jacob's take over the years. In fact people had been breeding plants and animals more or less wittingly for centuries before that Bible passage was written. Some people think Darwin "invented" it. Obviously he did not. The real scientific issue has never been whether those mechanics of evolution can operate to make changes in already living organisms over time. The real issue has been how life could begin in the first place. Somewhat reasonably intelligent people, at one time anyway, liked to believe the mechanics of evolution could be extended to explain the origin itself of life. That of course was when people had rather simplistic notion of life. A century and a half later it is apparent that will never happen. Among other problems is that before life begins the smaller molecules have the competitive advantage over the larger molecules. Somehow despite all this, large numbers of the public continue to believe that people who actually read the Bible must deny evolution, and people who like science must continue to hope, against what they can can plainly see in the lab, that life could begin by the mechanics of evolution from lifeless matter. Even Darwin never said it would. That is because most Democrats, the Trump followers, and others are too plain stupid to follow the real issues. It does not matter what you think though. The truth will at last come out. There is nothing you can do to stop it. I never heard anyone saying that Darwin "invented" evolution. There is a question about how life originated but that's not evolution. That's just abiogenesis.
May I kick the evolutionists out of school for plagiarism then?
The judge in Kitzmiller v Dover seemed to think that Intelligent Design was "Creationism" in disguise. Tell me that is not a problem.
|
|
|
Post by Winter_King on Apr 24, 2024 12:24:49 GMT
I never heard anyone saying that Darwin "invented" evolution. There is a question about how life originated but that's not evolution. That's just abiogenesis.
May I kick the evolutionists out of school for plagiarism then?
The judge in Kitzmiller v Dover seemed to think that Intelligent Design was "Creationism" in disguise. Tell me that is not a problem.
Intelligent Design is Creationism in disguise.
|
|
|
Post by Olaf Plunket on Apr 24, 2024 12:26:33 GMT
May I kick the evolutionists out of school for plagiarism then?
The judge in Kitzmiller v Dover seemed to think that Intelligent Design was "Creationism" in disguise. Tell me that is not a problem.
Intelligent Design is Creationism in disguise. Hey, I know! Just repeat something that makes no sense so everyone knows you're an idiot.
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Apr 24, 2024 12:28:17 GMT
The judge in Kitzmiller v Dover seemed to think that Intelligent Design was "Creationism" in disguise. Tell me that is not a problem.
When the publishers of a creationist "textbook" are caught replacing every mention of "creationism" in the text with "intelligent design," that kind of gives the game away to anyone with half a brain.
|
|