|
Post by Hairynosedwombat on Apr 24, 2024 12:28:30 GMT
OMG he's that evil journalist that refused to regurgitate MSM narratives. I need to hate him to prove I'm virtuous. He's a fucking idiot and so are you.
|
|
|
Post by notoriousnobbi on Apr 24, 2024 12:35:39 GMT
He's a fucking idiot and so are you. The continuation was "Three men on the Bummel" / "Three Men on Wheels"
|
|
|
Post by Winter_King on Apr 24, 2024 12:37:13 GMT
Intelligent Design is Creationism in disguise. Hey, I know! Just repeat something that makes no sense so everyone knows you're an idiot. But it makes perfect sense. Intelligent Design is creationism. It was their attempt to shove creationism into schools under the pretenses that it was an actual science even though they basically admitted that if ID was science, so was astrology.
|
|
|
Post by TheGoodMan19 on Apr 24, 2024 12:41:31 GMT
10-1 Tuckie is a Flat Earther too
|
|
|
Post by notoriousnobbi on Apr 24, 2024 13:21:53 GMT
#1 Men know about evolution since breeding was invented. #2 If Tucker Carlson wasn't willfully ignorant I would bet he is the product of breeding dumbfuckers #3 In case the question is how the big step from anorganic material to the first biological cell was made look no further than to the works of Manfred Eigen www.mpinat.mpg.de/643737/portrait Eigen is dead but there are enough scientists knowing this field - sadly Joe Rogan does not invite them to such shows.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Apr 24, 2024 13:24:02 GMT
Carlson's just another proof that being shatteringly stupid has never prevented anyone from becoming a media star. Hell, it may even help.
|
|
|
Post by mrellaguru on Apr 24, 2024 13:27:57 GMT
He has an audience of conservative evangelical dimwits to pander to, so who knows if he even believes everything that he says.
|
|
|
Post by PaulsLaugh on Apr 24, 2024 13:33:34 GMT
He's a fucking idiot and so are you. Do you feel the virtue flowing through you? Or do you need to hate even harder? Speak for yourself.
|
|
|
Post by Factchecker3Point0 on Apr 24, 2024 13:33:34 GMT
He has an audience of conservative evangelical dimwits to pander to, so who knows if he even believes everything that he says. I firmly believe that this is a case of Tucker trying to sell something that he doesn't actually buy.
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Apr 24, 2024 13:57:15 GMT
He believes in the Theory of Creation…
Rogan did not press Carlson on the matter, except to ask what his theories are.
'God created people distinctly, and animals,' replied Carlson. He has not made public declarations about his faith, but Carlson tends to speak in support of Christian ideas.
In this case, he cited the biblical book of Genesis, in which God created humans and animals.
And that’s all the proof he needs.
|
|
|
Post by thekindercarebear (A/S/L) on Apr 24, 2024 13:59:04 GMT
wth...
|
|
|
Post by Olaf Plunket on Apr 24, 2024 22:38:47 GMT
The judge in Kitzmiller v Dover seemed to think that Intelligent Design was "Creationism" in disguise. Tell me that is not a problem.
When the publishers of a creationist "textbook" are caught replacing every mention of "creationism" in the text with "intelligent design," that kind of gives the game away to anyone with half a brain.
I would think anyone familiar with these anonymous discussion boards would realize not everyone is who they claim to be. In the case in Kitzmiller v. Dover it is rather obvious the "Intelligent Design" side was not who they claimed to be. They were rather obviously about maintaining the filthy lie that evolution is not in the Bible. It is. What Jacob did could easily have happened in nature. In the centuries of various more or less witting attempts at breeding plants and animals before the Bible was written it must have occurred to someone that populations can change. There just were not any newspapers. There is therefore no "fixity of species" in the Bible.
Intelligent Design is not about evolution, but it is not opposed to it. It merely notes that evolution cannot explain the origin of life. Before life begins smaller molecules have the competitive advantage over larger molecules. There is your "natural selection" at work, genius.
|
|
|
Post by PaulsLaugh on Apr 24, 2024 22:48:39 GMT
When the publishers of a creationist "textbook" are caught replacing every mention of "creationism" in the text with "intelligent design," that kind of gives the game away to anyone with half a brain. I would think anyone familiar with these anonymous discussion boards would realize not everyone is who they claim to be. In the case in Kitzmiller v. Dover it is rather obvious the "Intelligent Design" side was not who they claimed to be. They were rather obviously about maintaining the filthy lie that evolution is not in the Bible. It is. What Jacob did could easily have happened in nature. In the centuries of various more or less witting attempts at breeding plants and animals before the Bible was written it must have occurred to someone that populations can change. There just were not any newspapers. There is therefore no "fixity of species" in the Bible.
Intelligent Design is not about evolution, but it is not opposed to it. It merely notes that evolution cannot explain the origin of life. Before life begins smaller molecules have the competitive advantage over larger molecules. There is your "natural selection" at work, genius.
Neither does laying it off on an unprovable Intelligent Designer. You must have your existential justification wrapped up in ID. That’s fine for your own spirituality, but don’t expect it to be accepted as a legitimate science. It is a religious faith.
|
|
|
Post by Olaf Plunket on Apr 24, 2024 22:51:23 GMT
Hey, I know! Just repeat something that makes no sense so everyone knows you're an idiot. But it makes perfect sense. Intelligent Design is creationism. It was their attempt to shove creationism into schools under the pretenses that it was an actual science even though they basically admitted that if ID was science, so was astrology. The "Creationism versus Evolution debate" takes place between two groups of equally misinformed people. On the creationism side are the people who expect the Bible to be taken literally, even though the Bible itself does not require it be taken literally. On the evolution side are people who believe evolution can explain the origin of life, even though Darwin never claimed it would, and it obviously cannot happen. "Creationism" is the attempt by mentally retarded people on both sides, but especially atheists since they are more prone to take the Bible literally than any religious people are.
|
|
|
Post by Olaf Plunket on Apr 24, 2024 22:58:31 GMT
I would think anyone familiar with these anonymous discussion boards would realize not everyone is who they claim to be. In the case in Kitzmiller v. Dover it is rather obvious the "Intelligent Design" side was not who they claimed to be. They were rather obviously about maintaining the filthy lie that evolution is not in the Bible. It is. What Jacob did could easily have happened in nature. In the centuries of various more or less witting attempts at breeding plants and animals before the Bible was written it must have occurred to someone that populations can change. There just were not any newspapers. There is therefore no "fixity of species" in the Bible.
Intelligent Design is not about evolution, but it is not opposed to it. It merely notes that evolution cannot explain the origin of life. Before life begins smaller molecules have the competitive advantage over larger molecules. There is your "natural selection" at work, genius.
Neither does laying it off on an unprovable Intelligent Designer. You must have your existential justification wrapped up in ID. That’s fine for your own spirituality, but don’t expect it to be accepted as a legitimate science. It is a religious faith. Intelligent Design is as proved as gravity is. You are not able to understand that. Just as everything falls, the universe winds down when no living things wind it up. Fortuitously it really doesn't require your understanding, so you can go f___ yourself
|
|