|
Post by jeffersoncody on Apr 25, 2024 9:13:43 GMT
Bullshit Boricanator, history will prove me right and you wrong. Just like with the trans issue. Public opinion has moved dramatically against Israel. When have the masses ever been right Boricanator? I am unmoved by public opinion. Remember when the majority of Germans voted for Adolf Hitler? Being swayed by "public opinion" and propaganda is pure stupidity.
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Apr 25, 2024 9:32:30 GMT
Thank you for the thread mr self, it is heartwarming to know these anti-Semitic, Hamas enabling little assholes will be dealt with appropriately if they fuck around in Texas. Texas must serve as an example to the rest of America. I have no problem with violent protest if the stakes are Texas being an example for all of America. Texas won’t ever be an example for all of America, but in the context of pro-Palestinian protestors, they are doing the most appropriate thing.
|
|
|
Post by Boricanator on Apr 25, 2024 9:43:29 GMT
Public opinion has moved dramatically against Israel. When have the masses ever been right Boricanator? I am unmoved by public opinion. Remember when the majority of Germans voted for Adolf Hitler? Being swayed by "public opinion" and propaganda is pure stupidity. Fair enough. But, remember, at the beginning people were supporting Israel. I should note that a majority of Germans did not vote for Hitler. See below. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1932_German_presidential_electionHitler’s rise was a complicated process that involved a lot of bureaucratic moves.
|
|
|
Post by Power Ranger on Apr 25, 2024 9:44:05 GMT
I reckon donations will be diverted from Ivy League schools to other universities. Expect the university rankings to change if just a little in the future. Especially if prestigious faculty members and top students get put off by what’s happening at Yale etc and move to universities where radicals are dealt with.
|
|
|
Post by theBROKEdontrump on Apr 25, 2024 11:39:05 GMT
I reckon donations will be diverted from Ivy League schools to other universities. Expect the university rankings to change if just a little in the future. Especially if prestigious faculty members and top students get put off by what’s happening at Yale etc and move to universities where radicals are dealt with. Like UofT Austin? One of the most lib schools in the US? Lol
|
|
|
Post by marsatax on Apr 25, 2024 14:29:08 GMT
I hope the cops use water cannon and rubber bullets on these young, ignorant pro-Palestine, Hamas enabling little cunts. Yeah, but you would have said the same of the Civil Rights marches. There is no comparison. The Civil Rights movement was, like its name, devoted to rights. In contrast, the present protesters are chanting "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free [of Jews]", which means they are AGAINST the rights of Jews.
|
|
|
Post by bartlesby on Apr 25, 2024 14:42:14 GMT
Yeah, but you would have said the same of the Civil Rights marches. There is no comparison. The Civil Rights movement was, like its name, devoted to rights. In contrast, the present protesters are chanting "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free [of Jews]", which means they are AGAINST the rights of Jews. No, see, that's where you're mixed up. They are FOR the rights of Palestinians. From the river to the sea in this context means the one-state solution where Palestinians have equal rights rather than living under the brutal thumb of the Israelis.
|
|
|
Post by Jep Gambardella on Apr 25, 2024 14:48:34 GMT
There is no comparison. The Civil Rights movement was, like its name, devoted to rights. In contrast, the present protesters are chanting "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free [of Jews]", which means they are AGAINST the rights of Jews. No, see, that's where you're mixed up. They are FOR the rights of Palestinians. From the river to the sea in this context means the one-state solution where Palestinians have equal rights rather than living under the brutal thumb of the Israelis. If you believe Palestinians would give equal rights to Jews in a one-state solution you are much dumber than I thought!
|
|
|
Post by bartlesby on Apr 25, 2024 14:50:13 GMT
No, see, that's where you're mixed up. They are FOR the rights of Palestinians. From the river to the sea in this context means the one-state solution where Palestinians have equal rights rather than living under the brutal thumb of the Israelis. If you believe Palestinians would give equal rights to Jews in a one-state solution you are much dumber than I thought!
Well, I doubt they would, now. How many of their babies have the Israelis killed up to this point? However, that's a different sentiment than how mars would like to depict it. Whether naive or not, it's not calling for a genocide of Jews or taking away their rights.
|
|
|
Post by SciFive on Apr 25, 2024 14:55:03 GMT
No, see, that's where you're mixed up. They are FOR the rights of Palestinians. From the river to the sea in this context means the one-state solution where Palestinians have equal rights rather than living under the brutal thumb of the Israelis. If you believe Palestinians would give equal rights to Jews in a one-state solution you are much dumber than I thought!
Mahmoud Abbas has promised that there will be no Jews in his state if the two state solution happens. Hamas talks about acquiring Israel completely and says they would have to decide which Jews to execute. The estimate is about a million. They would keep educated Jews as slaves not permitted to leave so we (educated Jews) could run the high tech and other industries. Hamas says they would take ownership of all property (business and personal) and decide who uses it. The Palestinian leadership are monsters through and through.
|
|
|
Post by marsatax on Apr 25, 2024 15:04:33 GMT
There is no comparison. The Civil Rights movement was, like its name, devoted to rights. In contrast, the present protesters are chanting "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free [of Jews]", which means they are AGAINST the rights of Jews. No, see, that's where you're mixed up. They are FOR the rights of Palestinians. From the river to the sea in this context means the one-state solution where Palestinians have equal rights rather than living under the brutal thumb of the Israelis. They are FOR the rights of Palestinians.
Wrong. If they were, they would be angry at Lebanon for forcing Palestinians there to stay in refugee camps. And they would be angry at Syria for the Palestinians killed in Yarmouk refugee camp. They are not FOR Palestinians, but merely AGAINST Israel. From the river to the sea in this context means the one-state solution where Palestinians have equal rights
The one-state "solution" means the destruction of Israel, an obvious violation of the right of Israelis to self-determination. And it would make Jews a minority everywhere and a majority nowhere again, as was the case during the Holocaust. No decent person would force Jews to return to that situation. rather than living under the brutal thumb of the Israelis.Sometimes I can't believe the naiveté and mindlessness of the Israel-bashers. Israel removed its "brutal thumb" from Gaza in 2005. Israelis were hoping the Palestinians there would reciprocate by keeping the peace, and that a similar withdrawal from the West Bank could follow. But the Palestinians voted in Hamas and turned Gaza into a base for blitzing Israeli towns with rockets. And Israel is the one at fault for refusing to withdraw from Gaza? Good grief.
|
|
|
Post by bartlesby on Apr 25, 2024 15:10:01 GMT
No, see, that's where you're mixed up. They are FOR the rights of Palestinians. From the river to the sea in this context means the one-state solution where Palestinians have equal rights rather than living under the brutal thumb of the Israelis. They are FOR the rights of Palestinians.
Wrong. If they were, they would be angry at Lebanon for forcing Palestinians there to stay in refugee camps. And they would be angry at Syria for the Palestinians killed in Yarmouk refugee camp. They are not FOR Palestinians, but merely AGAINST Israel. From the river to the sea in this context means the one-state solution where Palestinians have equal rights
The one-state "solution" means the destruction of Israel, an obvious violation of the right of Israelis to self-determination. And it would make Jews a minority everywhere and a majority nowhere again, as was the case during the Holocaust. No decent person would force Jews to return to that situation. rather than living under the brutal thumb of the Israelis.Sometimes I can't believe the naiveté and mindlessness of the Israel-bashers. Israel removed its "brutal thumb" from Gaza in 2005. Israelis were hoping the Palestinians there would reciprocate by keeping the peace, and that a similar withdrawal from the West Bank could follow. But the Palestinians voted in Hamas and turned Gaza into a base for blitzing Israeli towns with rockets. And Israel is the one at fault for refusing to withdraw from Gaza? Good grief. Great. I try to keep my response to three sentences and you still give me three paragraphs. The one state solution only means the destruction of Israel if it must exist as an ethnostate. You've balked at that description yet here you are endorsing it. Israel never removed its thumb from Gaza and you know enough about history to know that.
|
|
|
Post by SciFive on Apr 25, 2024 15:13:17 GMT
The Palestinians are seeking an "ethnostate" for "Palestinians", but those against Israel think that's ok.
It would be an Arab Muslim state - the 22nd Arab Muslim state in the world.
A state devoted to one religion would be ok with those who are against Israel.
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Apr 25, 2024 15:13:41 GMT
From the river to the sea in this context means the one-state solution where Palestinians have equal rights
The one-state "solution" means the destruction of Israel, an obvious violation of the right of Israelis to self-determination. And it would make Jews a minority everywhere and a majority nowhere again, as was the case during the Holocaust. No decent person would force Jews to return to that situation.
The same people that seemingly spot evil and racism in every word Trump says..........somehow do not believe these other people when they openly say "Death to Israel"?
|
|
|
Post by bartlesby on Apr 25, 2024 15:18:28 GMT
From the river to the sea in this context means the one-state solution where Palestinians have equal rights
The one-state "solution" means the destruction of Israel, an obvious violation of the right of Israelis to self-determination. And it would make Jews a minority everywhere and a majority nowhere again, as was the case during the Holocaust. No decent person would force Jews to return to that situation.
The same people that seemingly spot evil and racism in every word Trump says..........somehow do not believe these other people when they openly say "Death to Israel"?
First off, abbey, if I could form a line of people woefully unqualified to talk about Israel, you would be near the end and obscured by fog. Second, "Death to Israel" isn't the chant we're talking about.
|
|