'One vote from the end of democracy'

'Genuinely shocking': Pro-Trump justices give presidential immunity case bad faith treatment

And once presidential immunity is verified Biden will just throw Trump in prison anyway, since the decision will apply to ALL presidents, not just your Dear Leader.

Didn't think about that, did you? Probably because yet again you're just parroting what you've been told to think.

Problem with that theory is that neither the Progressives nor Constitutionalist judges seemed to even vaguely consider total immunity. One group seemed to oppose immunity while another group spoke to its limits that would be put forth by lower courts depending upon severity of individual charges. Neither side indicated any full immunity. Thus, the supposition of Biden throwing Trump in jail is just as unlikely to hold as the idea that a president has no immunity.

I can only speculate, of course. But it seems they're kicking it back to the lower courts and having them itemize each charge and specify why it is or is not covered by presidential immunity. Then SCOTUS would take them up again to review. So if the charge of a speech was somehow connected to a subsequent riot (and was demonstrated) and then charged.... we will see what the high court determines.

****Was that a specific charge brought forward?... or was that a hypothetical?

Is it really shocking, though?

Do you figure attacking a group that largely votes Democrat helped Hillary or helps Biden? 

Hard to say. One might say this was their only viable option. If they let all charges stand and disregard immunity as a whole... then every subsequent president would have to worry about retroactive prosecution. Conversely, if they bought into total immunity, then the contention that a president could simply jail their opponents would be Constitutionally protected. This is the best middle ground and would be best approached on a case by cases basis depending upon the charge.