|
|
Post by scienceisgod on Feb 6, 2018 22:11:51 GMT
Why didn’t you die protecting me from Iraqian Weapons of Mass Destruction? This is a serious question. You have no claim to believing the Russia stuff if you aren’t dead. It’s based on the same manufactured evidence. You either trust all 18 Intelligence Communities as represented by perjurer James Clapler’s handpicked analysists, or you’re not alive because you trusted all 18 Intelligence Communities as represented by perjurer James Clapler’s handpicked analysists and killed yourself in Iraq.
The truth is you’re lying and desperate to start a war. And you made it obvious out of disrespect.
Hillary lost. New York Times said she had an 85% chance and she lost.
Discuss:
|
|
|
|
Post by Joc Spader on Feb 6, 2018 22:37:53 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2018 0:54:32 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by slowcomingwarbird on Feb 7, 2018 2:47:11 GMT
More like serious trolling... Butthurt much that the Nunes Memo proves that the Russia investigation was not based on the Christopher Steele Memo? And that the GOP Nunes Memo actually only serves to further prove Donald Trump's guilt in the matter. Oh wait, you didn't actually read the Nunes Memo, did you? You just took the word of some fat oaf who can't read... www.cnn.com/2018/02/02/politics/fbi-nunes-memo-full/index.htmlDoes Russia want to start a war with the United States? Is that why Putin recently inspected the infamous "Dead Hand" facility located at Kosvensky Mountian? The facility that houses the computer system designed to automatically launch all of Russia's nukes if an attack is detected, or if something goes wrong. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2018 3:36:11 GMT
Why didn’t you die protecting me from Iraqian Weapons of Mass Destruction? This is a serious question. You have no claim to believing the Russia stuff if you aren’t dead. It’s based on the same manufactured evidence. You either trust all 18 Intelligence Communities as represented by perjurer James Clapler’s handpicked analysists, or you’re not alive because you trusted all 18 Intelligence Communities as represented by perjurer James Clapler’s handpicked analysists and killed yourself in Iraq. The truth is you’re lying and desperate to start a war. And you made it obvious out of disrespect. Hillary lost. New York Times said she had an 85% chance and she lost. Discuss: If you go back, you will see that Obama was planting the seeds on this Russian thing well before the election. These people strategize on multiple levels. There was a contingency plan (there's one in every well planned project) in place in the event that Trump won the election. Why do you think the first effort was a recount in those close Rust Belt states before it began to expose Democrat voting inconsistencies? Meanwhile, this FISA warrant (and spying) was going on to get dirt and/or entrap Trump's team. If somehow they could have make that stick, they (and the media) would have clamored about a Constitutional Crisis, where they would have argued that the American people really wanted HRC. Yes. She wanted it that bad. Obama wanted it that bad to preserve his legacy. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2018 5:18:03 GMT
I still want to know exactly what it is the liberals think the Russians did to make me change my vote from Hillary to Trump. If I understand correctly, there was some kind of sinister meeting where the Russians agreed to buy Facebook ads or something?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2018 14:02:44 GMT
The Russians were involved in the election no more than any of the hundreds of lobbyists on both sides. But the way the MSM spins it, you get a mental image of Putin in front of a computer terminal, changing actual voting numbers.
|
|
