|
|
Post by Fetzer Zinfandel ♀︎ on Nov 20, 2024 18:13:41 GMT
How will Nancy Mace's new bill improve these situations? Be specific. Women: Uncomfortable with men in women only spaces.
Bill: Prevents that. Restores common sense.
What bill does that? The nancy mace bill is about the CAPITOL BATHROOMS. For ONE trans person. It's literally just designed to shame one person. It's performative nonsense. |
|
|
|
Post by cat on Nov 20, 2024 18:21:56 GMT
Women: Uncomfortable with men in women only spaces.
Bill: Prevents that. Restores common sense.
What bill does that? The nancy mace bill is about the CAPITOL BATHROOMS. For ONE trans person. It's literally just designed to shame one person. It's performative nonsense. Yep. All that's missing from your reply is the exact same gif of purple shirt guy implying the obviousness. |
|
|
|
Post by Fetzer Zinfandel ♀︎ on Nov 20, 2024 18:24:38 GMT
What bill does that? The nancy mace bill is about the CAPITOL BATHROOMS. For ONE trans person. It's literally just designed to shame one person. It's performative nonsense. Yep. All that's missing from your reply is the exact same gif of purple shirt guy implying the obviousness. And he conflates bathrooms with changing rooms, of course... |
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Nov 20, 2024 18:31:08 GMT
Women: Uncomfortable with men in women only spaces. Bill: Prevents that. Restores common sense.
Fragile white men: Uncomfortable with black men in changerooms. Bill: Reintroduces race-segregated changerooms from the Jim Crow era. Common sense? Silly. A better solution would be: No common changerooms and showers. Only private ones. It's expensive; but if we value rights of the individuals, it would be the more just solution. Let's not.
You have to deflect from the topic because that's how much you can't defend your stance.
|
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Nov 20, 2024 18:35:06 GMT
Let's modify the setting a little bit.Fragile white men: Uncomfortable with black men in changerooms. Bill: Reintroduces race-segregated changerooms from the Jim Crow era. Common sense? Silly. A better solution would be: No common changerooms and showers. Only private ones. It's expensive; but if we value rights of the individuals, it would be the more just solution. Let's not.
You have to deflect from the topic because that's how much you can't defend your stance.
I can and I did. It's not my fault if you refuse to think. |
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Nov 20, 2024 18:38:50 GMT
Women: Uncomfortable with men in women only spaces.
Bill: Prevents that. Restores common sense.
What bill does that? The nancy mace bill is about the CAPITOL BATHROOMS. For ONE trans person. It's literally just designed to shame one person. It's performative nonsense. Shaming. Of course! It couldn't possibly be because women simply don't want to piss, shit, get changed in the same room as, or compete against men.
Do you people ever tired of this card? You just got your asses. kicked. A majority of the country (soundly) rejected your views and you still can't stop yourselves from doing it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deplorable Fascist Garbage on Nov 20, 2024 18:46:41 GMT
I guess he will have to hike his skirt and use the urinal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fetzer Zinfandel ♀︎ on Nov 20, 2024 18:49:51 GMT
What bill does that? The nancy mace bill is about the CAPITOL BATHROOMS. For ONE trans person. It's literally just designed to shame one person. It's performative nonsense. Shaming. Of course! It couldn't possibly be because women simply don't want to piss, shit, get changed in the same room as, or compete against men.
Do you people ever tired of this card? You just got your asses. kicked. A majority of the country (soundly) rejected your views and you still can't stop yourselves from doing it.
You're fighting the wrong fight with the wrong person, bro. And deflecting like crazy. But again. What problem does THIS bill solve? This bill about CAPITOL BATHROOMS where there's one known trans person. What problem does this solve? Reality: you saw a headline and replied without reading what it's about and you can't just admit that. |
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Nov 20, 2024 18:55:48 GMT
Didn't seem so long ago we were considering unisex bathrooms across the board. Seeing as we have them in our private houses, after all. Guess we are heading the exact other direction now. I feel for the cops who get assigned potty patrol to check birth certificates at the stall door. That job's gonna suck! And all coming out of Abbey's pocket, too. Why do we have to? Men's and women's rooms already exist. Why should businesses, nonprofits, and government entities have to spend thousands of dollars to retrofit their property? Enough catering to the mentally ill because we're afraid to tell them no. Fuck these people. They're not special. |
|
|
|
Post by jimmywynn on Nov 20, 2024 19:10:23 GMT
Didn't seem so long ago we were considering unisex bathrooms across the board. Seeing as we have them in our private houses, after all. Guess we are heading the exact other direction now. I feel for the cops who get assigned potty patrol to check birth certificates at the stall door. That job's gonna suck! And all coming out of Abbey's pocket, too. Why do we have to? Men's and women's rooms already exist. Why should businesses, nonprofits, and government entities have to spend thousands of dollars to retrofit their property? Enough catering to the mentally ill because we're afraid to tell them no. Fuck these people. They're not special. Piss off. |
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Nov 20, 2024 19:12:58 GMT
Women: Uncomfortable with men in women only spaces.
Bill: Prevents that. Restores common sense.
What bill does that? The nancy mace bill is about the CAPITOL BATHROOMS. For ONE trans person. It's literally just designed to shame one person. It's performative nonsense. Shame? That person was already ashamed of whatever it was before which is why it wanted transform to someone else. And weren't you posting JK Rowling threads like she was Gandhi? You're a mess. |
|
|
|
Post by dlancer on Nov 20, 2024 19:20:53 GMT
I'm sure Mace isn't just doing this to plant her foot on the MAGA side of the culture war, and certainly isn't doing this to virtue signal how protective she is of women.
She's clearly doing this because this so-called transwoman is a real threat to congresswomen, and is trying to assault them at every turn.
Clearly.
|
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Nov 20, 2024 19:22:36 GMT
Why do we have to? Men's and women's rooms already exist. Why should businesses, nonprofits, and government entities have to spend thousands of dollars to retrofit their property? Enough catering to the mentally ill because we're afraid to tell them no. Fuck these people. They're not special. Piss off. No. Fuck you people. You took this shit too far. You know they're not women, you're just too chickenshit to tell them, so you pivot to rest of us. The sane people calling it out.
This is a supreme court justice for Christ's sake:
|
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Nov 20, 2024 19:25:19 GMT
Women: Uncomfortable with men in women only spaces.
Bill: Prevents that. Restores common sense.
What bill does that? The nancy mace bill is about the CAPITOL BATHROOMS. For ONE trans person. It's literally just designed to shame one person. It's performative nonsense. |
|
|
|
Post by dlancer on Nov 20, 2024 19:29:19 GMT
No. Fuck you people. You took this shit too far. You know they're not women, you're just too chickenshit to tell them, so you pivot to rest of us. The sane people calling it out.
This is a supreme court justice for Christ's sake:
You're too late.
Everyone uses the term transwoman now.
Your best bet was to condemn "men in disguise" before society began accepting trans terminology.
Now you're stuck trying to convince people that a transwoman isn't a woman when "woman" is in the name.
Like ice-skating up a hill.
|
|
