|
|
Post by bartlesby on Nov 24, 2024 15:11:51 GMT
Well, it doesn't really matter, you defended it either way. And just like your joke, it's an exaggeration, anyway. So why are you so upset about it? Well, it kinda does matter since you made it up, lol I've never defended Brands actions, merely the fact that people are innocent until proven guilty and we should not be punished based on allegations. So you've invented a position I never had, to defend Molly, for some reason. Just like Molly, and Dracula and Amy. As have you made an allegation which you robbed of context and called a joke. Just as you can glibly call somebody a supporter of terrorism because they're sympathetic towards Palestinians in the midst of a brutal ethnic cleansing campaign, I can glibly call you a pedophile because you were sympathetic towards Brand. That's the way comedy works. ![[bounce]](http://storage.proboards.com/6870873/images/CJSXmFbfmHtLNgaDSJaQ.gif) |
|
|
|
Post by Stam on Nov 24, 2024 15:16:07 GMT
Heretic Leviathan Feologild and StammerHead I expected STAMMERHEAD to be the first one!!! The others deleted before him. |
|
|
|
Post by Dracula on Nov 24, 2024 15:31:58 GMT
One more time, I didn't say you made the claim I asked about. It was a question. You implied she supports Hamas, so I asked you where she's said anything positive about Hamas which would be evidence she supports them. You have an avatar of an Israeli flag. That's your statement that you support Israel. You're clearly a mental case. lol, I don't know if you are so stupid that you don't understand that you asked a leading question in formation of your strawman, or just angry I know you did. Your posts was this The obvious reason you asked that in that way is because you are pretty sure I can't, even if she HAD, her account has been deleted. Thus when if I answer "I can't" you sit back and claim victory in your strawman. Do you still think I will play your stupid games by your rules, Drac? Even if I can't, that wouldn't mae my implication in my initial post wrong. So what was the point, other than to claim victory over something that only happened in your head? Before I replied to you, you had already called me a liar. When I did respond to you, you again called me a liar. How can I be lying about that when I never claimed it? You had determined that I was lying about your question, even before I responded to it, thus you were not really asking an honest question, since you had already determined the answer. And an Israeli flag huh? So are you saying that it is possible to infer a persons position even if they don't say positive things about it? Fascinating stuff. Look at the knots you tie yourself in because you're a nauseating mental case with a fragile ego dying on a hill to reject the fact you said something flat-out false. This is very simple. You falsely implied that she supports Hamas, so I asked you where she's said anything positive about Hamas, point being, asking you to support your false claim that she supports them since that support would come in the form of her writing something indicating that support. Instead, you go off on a semantics tangent asking me "but I didn't say that she said something positive" like a goddamn psycho when that was just a question to you. Your Israeli flag avatar is your positive statement about Israel, and your arguments in support of Israel having the right to defend itself are positive arguments in support of Israel. The person you falsely implied supports Hamas has never said anything similar about Hamas. She's never said anything in support of Hamas attacking Israel. She's never said anything about Hamas having the right to exist, but on the contrary, that they should be eliminated. She's never defended what Hamas did on Oct 7th, but has condemned it. She's never said anything for anyone to infer she supports Hamas. What you implied about her was simply false and stupid and based on absolutely nothing. Continue your semantics argument like a nutcase. The simple point is you lied about someone, falsely implying they support Hamas with the fact being you're getting that idea from absolutely nowhere. So I'm done here now because there's obviously something wrong with you and this is just weird. |
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Nov 24, 2024 15:47:25 GMT
Well, it kinda does matter since you made it up, lol I've never defended Brands actions, merely the fact that people are innocent until proven guilty and we should not be punished based on allegations. So you've invented a position I never had, to defend Molly, for some reason. Just like Molly, and Dracula and Amy. As have you made an allegation which you robbed of context and called a joke. Just as you can glibly call somebody a supporter of terrorism because they're sympathetic towards Palestinians in the midst of a brutal ethnic cleansing campaign, I can glibly call you a pedophile because you were sympathetic towards Brand. That's the way comedy works. Well, you could if I had been. But you are making up something that never happened so, whatever I guess. |
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Nov 24, 2024 15:52:00 GMT
lol, I don't know if you are so stupid that you don't understand that you asked a leading question in formation of your strawman, or just angry I know you did. Your posts was this The obvious reason you asked that in that way is because you are pretty sure I can't, even if she HAD, her account has been deleted. Thus when if I answer "I can't" you sit back and claim victory in your strawman. Do you still think I will play your stupid games by your rules, Drac? Even if I can't, that wouldn't mae my implication in my initial post wrong. So what was the point, other than to claim victory over something that only happened in your head? Before I replied to you, you had already called me a liar. When I did respond to you, you again called me a liar. How can I be lying about that when I never claimed it? You had determined that I was lying about your question, even before I responded to it, thus you were not really asking an honest question, since you had already determined the answer. And an Israeli flag huh? So are you saying that it is possible to infer a persons position even if they don't say positive things about it? Fascinating stuff. Look at the knots you tie yourself in because you're a nauseating mental case with a fragile ego dying on a hill to reject the fact you said something flat-out false. This is very simple. You falsely implied that she supports Hamas, so I asked you where she's said anything positive about Hamas, point being, asking you to support your false claim that she supports them since that support would come in the form of her writing something indicating that support. Instead, you go off on a semantics tangent asking me "but I didn't say that she said something positive" like a goddamn psycho when that was just a question to you. Your Israeli flag avatar is your positive statement about Israel, and your arguments in support of Israel having the right to defend itself are positive arguments in support of Israel. The person you falsely implied supports Hamas has never said anything similar about Hamas. She's never said anything in support of Hamas attacking Israel. She's never said anything about Hamas having the right to exist, but on the contrary, that they should be eliminated. She's never defended what Hamas did on Oct 7th, but has condemned it. She's never said anything for anyone to infer she supports Hamas. What you implied about her was simply false and stupid and based on absolutely nothing. Continue your semantics argument like a nutcase. The simple point is you lied about someone, falsely implying they support Hamas with the fact being you're getting that idea from absolutely nowhere. So I'm done here now because there's obviously something wrong with you and this is just weird. No knots here, princess. You accuse me of something I didn't do and when I reject your moronic stramaning you revert to "semantics, dying on a hill, mentally ill, psychotic, lying, back peddling" etc etc. But its hilarious how angry you get over this stuff. Carry one. |
|
|
|
Post by bartlesby on Nov 24, 2024 15:54:22 GMT
As have you made an allegation which you robbed of context and called a joke. Just as you can glibly call somebody a supporter of terrorism because they're sympathetic towards Palestinians in the midst of a brutal ethnic cleansing campaign, I can glibly call you a pedophile because you were sympathetic towards Brand. That's the way comedy works. Well, you could if I had been. But you are making up something that never happened so, whatever I guess. You were. You said he shouldn't be demonitized because they were just allegations. And while you said that (if the allegations were true) you don't find it morally acceptable for a grown man to have sex with a teenager, legally speaking, he's in the clear and should face no ramifications. And if you can connect the comedy dots from what kiwi said about Gaza to being a Hamas supporter, I can do the same with your support for him. That's the joke, right? We exaggerate reality. |
|
|
|
Post by Dracula on Nov 24, 2024 16:06:10 GMT
Look at the knots you tie yourself in because you're a nauseating mental case with a fragile ego dying on a hill to reject the fact you said something flat-out false. This is very simple. You falsely implied that she supports Hamas, so I asked you where she's said anything positive about Hamas, point being, asking you to support your false claim that she supports them since that support would come in the form of her writing something indicating that support. Instead, you go off on a semantics tangent asking me "but I didn't say that she said something positive" like a goddamn psycho when that was just a question to you. Your Israeli flag avatar is your positive statement about Israel, and your arguments in support of Israel having the right to defend itself are positive arguments in support of Israel. The person you falsely implied supports Hamas has never said anything similar about Hamas. She's never said anything in support of Hamas attacking Israel. She's never said anything about Hamas having the right to exist, but on the contrary, that they should be eliminated. She's never defended what Hamas did on Oct 7th, but has condemned it. She's never said anything for anyone to infer she supports Hamas. What you implied about her was simply false and stupid and based on absolutely nothing. Continue your semantics argument like a nutcase. The simple point is you lied about someone, falsely implying they support Hamas with the fact being you're getting that idea from absolutely nowhere. So I'm done here now because there's obviously something wrong with you and this is just weird. No knots here, princess. You accuse me of something I didn't do and when I reject your moronic stramaning you revert to "semantics, dying on a hill, mentally ill, psychotic, lying, back peddling" etc etc. But its hilarious how angry you get over this stuff. Carry one. I was gonna give you the final word, but your final word sucks. What did I accuse you of that you didn't do? You in fact implied someone supports Hamas, so I ASKED you where that person said something positive about Hamas, point being, asking you to point out anything from her where one could deduce she supports Hamas, to prove that you're not making that up about her. It's a normal question anyone would ask when you imply such a thing about someone. Your entire psycho argument since then is just telling me that I said you literally said she's said something positive about Hamas, and you don't understand how pathetic this makes you look. |
|
|
|
Post by Dracula on Nov 24, 2024 16:13:53 GMT
Correct. Thor the liar might now die on a hill though deflecting and throwing out whataboutisms to pretend he didn't lie as he usually does. Just as predicted. 5 days later and psycho is still on "but I didn't say that she said something positive." |
|
|
|
Post by jimmywynn on Nov 24, 2024 17:11:28 GMT
Look at the knots you tie yourself in because you're a nauseating mental case with a fragile ego dying on a hill to reject the fact you said something flat-out false. This is very simple. You falsely implied that she supports Hamas, so I asked you where she's said anything positive about Hamas, point being, asking you to support your false claim that she supports them since that support would come in the form of her writing something indicating that support. Instead, you go off on a semantics tangent asking me "but I didn't say that she said something positive" like a goddamn psycho when that was just a question to you. Your Israeli flag avatar is your positive statement about Israel, and your arguments in support of Israel having the right to defend itself are positive arguments in support of Israel. The person you falsely implied supports Hamas has never said anything similar about Hamas. She's never said anything in support of Hamas attacking Israel. She's never said anything about Hamas having the right to exist, but on the contrary, that they should be eliminated. She's never defended what Hamas did on Oct 7th, but has condemned it. She's never said anything for anyone to infer she supports Hamas. What you implied about her was simply false and stupid and based on absolutely nothing. Continue your semantics argument like a nutcase. The simple point is you lied about someone, falsely implying they support Hamas with the fact being you're getting that idea from absolutely nowhere. So I'm done here now because there's obviously something wrong with you and this is just weird. No knots here, princess. You accuse me of something I didn't do and when I reject your moronic stramaning you revert to "semantics, dying on a hill, mentally ill, psychotic, lying, back peddling" etc etc. But its hilarious how angry you get over this stuff. Carry one. Sunshine, you are a broken record. |
|
|
|
Post by 🐕 🐕 🐕 🐕 🐕 🐈⬛ Molly on Nov 24, 2024 17:23:21 GMT
Look at the knots you tie yourself in because you're a nauseating mental case with a fragile ego dying on a hill to reject the fact you said something flat-out false. This is very simple. You falsely implied that she supports Hamas, so I asked you where she's said anything positive about Hamas, point being, asking you to support your false claim that she supports them since that support would come in the form of her writing something indicating that support. Instead, you go off on a semantics tangent asking me "but I didn't say that she said something positive" like a goddamn psycho when that was just a question to you. Your Israeli flag avatar is your positive statement about Israel, and your arguments in support of Israel having the right to defend itself are positive arguments in support of Israel. The person you falsely implied supports Hamas has never said anything similar about Hamas. She's never said anything in support of Hamas attacking Israel. She's never said anything about Hamas having the right to exist, but on the contrary, that they should be eliminated. She's never defended what Hamas did on Oct 7th, but has condemned it. She's never said anything for anyone to infer she supports Hamas. What you implied about her was simply false and stupid and based on absolutely nothing. Continue your semantics argument like a nutcase. The simple point is you lied about someone, falsely implying they support Hamas with the fact being you're getting that idea from absolutely nowhere. So I'm done here now because there's obviously something wrong with you and this is just weird. No knots here, princess. You accuse me of something I didn't do and when I reject your moronic stramaning you revert to "semantics, dying on a hill, mentally ill, psychotic, lying, back peddling" etc etc. But its hilarious how angry you get over this stuff. Carry one. ^^^kiddie diddler |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Skywalker on Nov 25, 2024 15:28:27 GMT
I expected STAMMERHEAD to be the first one!!! The others deleted before him. But Stammerhead is the most epic poster!
I really miss his Thanos avatar! Where's that awesome avatar?
|
|
|
|
Post by Harry Skywalker on Nov 25, 2024 15:30:24 GMT
I'm loving this thread!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Stam on Nov 25, 2024 15:51:56 GMT
The others deleted before him. But Stammerhead is the most epic poster!
I really miss his Thanos avatar! Where's that awesome avatar?
|
|
|
|
Post by Harry Skywalker on Nov 25, 2024 15:57:31 GMT
But Stammerhead is the most epic poster!
I really miss his Thanos avatar! Where's that awesome avatar?
Huh? That's not Thanos.
I thought it was Thanos with the smaller avatar.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Nov 25, 2024 16:08:48 GMT
When a poster is more exciting when they've left a board than when they were posting.
|
|
