|
Post by amyghost on Nov 23, 2024 10:07:30 GMT
Yup. Why belabor myself to do the hard graft of making you look like an absolute twat when you're doing such a splendid job of it with one hand tied behind your back? Because you can't, dear. You are going to keep insisting I lied, but refuse to demonstrate it. Just like in the other thread where you insist most of my posting is about taking the rights og LGBT people, but can't demonstrate it. Some people would call that dishonest, but not me... Your own posts demonstrate both. Repeatedly. It emphatically isn't my problem--or duty--to wake you up to that fact.
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Nov 23, 2024 10:55:43 GMT
At this point, the word for the day for you is : Whatever. You've lied, know you've lied, know all here know you've lied, and yet you keep believing you can persuade one and all you haven't. Come to the US and run for political office. You have a bright future ahead of you here. Brilliant. So what exactly was the lie? Its honestly amazing that for one so convinced I've lied, so willing to come back and make the claim, you won't support it. You could make me look an absolute twat, but you continue not to. Almost like you're wrong, you know you are wrong, but like your fellow leftist clowns, you can't admit it. Sad. She should be in a circus with face paint not a politics board. Have told her that so many times.
|
|
|
Post by 🐕 🐕 🐕 🐕 🐕 🐈⬛ Molly on Nov 23, 2024 12:02:40 GMT
Oh so I can say shit like you diddle kiddies and that will be ok, because hey, it’s just a joke! STFU, kiddie diddler. I mean, you can if you like. And now let’s do this. Where did i say I do that? Where? The same place you saw kiwi say she had Hamas memorabilia. Ok, kiddie diddler?
|
|
|
Post by Harry Skywalker on Nov 24, 2024 2:47:38 GMT
Can you give us some... errr... examples? Heretic Leviathan Feologild and StammerHead I expected STAMMERHEAD to be the first one!!!
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Nov 24, 2024 14:41:39 GMT
I mean, you can if you like. And now let’s do this. Where did i say I do that? Where? The same place you saw kiwi say she had Hamas memorabilia. Ok, kiddie diddler? Here's the thing, Molly, my dear. My statement was obviously a joke. It was obviously false and said to mock, since I'm pretty sure Hamas memorabilia isn't a thing. Thus it is obviously not a statement meant to be taken literally. The underlaying truth or lack thereof behind my statement is neither proven nor disproven by anything Kiwi ever said directly about Hamas. What you said was not a joke, you simply publicly accused me of a criminal offense because you're upset that you waded in with a load of accusations that you can't support.
|
|
|
Post by bartlesby on Nov 24, 2024 14:43:07 GMT
Where? The same place you saw kiwi say she had Hamas memorabilia. Ok, kiddie diddler? Here's the thing, Molly, my dear. My statement was obviously a joke. It was obviously false and said to mock, since I'm pretty sure Hamas memorabilia isn't a thing. Thus it is obviously not a statement meant to be taken literally. The underlaying truth or lack thereof behind my statement is neither proven nor disproven by anything Kiwi ever said directly about Hamas. What you said was not a joke, you simply publicly accused me of a criminal offense because you're upset that you waded in with a load of accusations that you can't support. No, she's obviously joking around just like you. You just got triggered over it. That's all.
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Nov 24, 2024 14:45:32 GMT
Because you can't, dear. You are going to keep insisting I lied, but refuse to demonstrate it. Just like in the other thread where you insist most of my posting is about taking the rights og LGBT people, but can't demonstrate it. Some people would call that dishonest, but not me... Your own posts demonstrate both. Repeatedly. It emphatically isn't my problem--or duty--to wake you up to that fact. Ok, so lets look at your logic here. I can't find Kiwi saying anything positive about Hamas to support my statement that she is "reorganising her Hamas memorabilia" Even though I didn't claim she said anything positive about them, this makes me a liar. You claim most of my posts are about taking the rights of LGB people, but cannot find any post of me doing so. This doesn't make you a liar because reasons, even though you did make the claim I accused you of. Ok sweetie.
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Nov 24, 2024 14:46:24 GMT
Here's the thing, Molly, my dear. My statement was obviously a joke. It was obviously false and said to mock, since I'm pretty sure Hamas memorabilia isn't a thing. Thus it is obviously not a statement meant to be taken literally. The underlaying truth or lack thereof behind my statement is neither proven nor disproven by anything Kiwi ever said directly about Hamas. What you said was not a joke, you simply publicly accused me of a criminal offense because you're upset that you waded in with a load of accusations that you can't support. No, she's obviously joking around just like you. You just got triggered over it. That's all. Ah another leftists, triggered by me. Bless. Explain the joke then, Bart.
|
|
|
Post by bartlesby on Nov 24, 2024 14:51:20 GMT
No, she's obviously joking around just like you. You just got triggered over it. That's all. Ah another leftists, triggered by me. Bless. Explain the joke then, Bart. I'm not triggered. I'm just piling on for my own entertainment. And I guess the joke, at least in my mind, comes from your past defense of Russell Brand fucking a 16 year old. At least in terms of his YouTube monetization.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Nov 24, 2024 14:56:56 GMT
Your own posts demonstrate both. Repeatedly. It emphatically isn't my problem--or duty--to wake you up to that fact. Ok, so lets look at your logic here. I can't find Kiwi saying anything positive about Hamas to support my statement that she is "reorganising her Hamas memorabilia" Even though I didn't claim she said anything positive about them, this makes me a liar. You claim most of my posts are about taking the rights of LGB people, but cannot find any post of me doing so. This doesn't make you a liar because reasons, even though you did make the claim I accused you of. Ok sweetie. You don't seem to be receiving much popular support for your claims as to not being a liar. And I'll still go by the examples of your posts, as opposed to your current logic twists in explicating them.
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Nov 24, 2024 14:58:10 GMT
ITs not at all confusing to me. But I didn't make the claim you asked about, so why would I attempt to support it? lol You don't get to invent my position, then demand I defend it, then call me a liar when I refuse, you silly boy. Let me give you an example. Its pretty reasonable for you to infer I support Israel. Quote me saying positive things about Israel or be named a liar forever, even though you inference is correct. Thicko. One more time, I didn't say you made the claim I asked about. It was a question. You implied she supports Hamas, so I asked you where she's said anything positive about Hamas which would be evidence she supports them. You have an avatar of an Israeli flag. That's your statement that you support Israel. You're clearly a mental case. lol, I don't know if you are so stupid that you don't understand that you asked a leading question in formation of your strawman, or just angry I know you did. Your posts was this The obvious reason you asked that in that way is because you are pretty sure I can't, even if she HAD, her account has been deleted. Thus when if I answer "I can't" you sit back and claim victory in your strawman. Do you still think I will play your stupid games by your rules, Drac? Even if I can't, that wouldn't mae my implication in my initial post wrong. So what was the point, other than to claim victory over something that only happened in your head? Before I replied to you, you had already called me a liar. When I did respond to you, you again called me a liar. How can I be lying about that when I never claimed it? You had determined that I was lying about your question, even before I responded to it, thus you were not really asking an honest question, since you had already determined the answer. And an Israeli flag huh? So are you saying that it is possible to infer a persons position even if they don't say positive things about it? Fascinating stuff.
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Nov 24, 2024 14:59:30 GMT
Ah another leftists, triggered by me. Bless. Explain the joke then, Bart. I'm not triggered. I'm just piling on for my own entertainment. And I guess the joke, at least in my mind, comes from your past defense of Russell Brand fucking a 16 year old. At least in terms of his YouTube monetization. I'm sure Molly was referencing that, lol And did I defend his having sex with a 16 year old, which would be legal in the UK anyway? Or did I defend the presumption of innocence? Try harder.
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Nov 24, 2024 15:00:30 GMT
Ok, so lets look at your logic here. I can't find Kiwi saying anything positive about Hamas to support my statement that she is "reorganising her Hamas memorabilia" Even though I didn't claim she said anything positive about them, this makes me a liar. You claim most of my posts are about taking the rights of LGB people, but cannot find any post of me doing so. This doesn't make you a liar because reasons, even though you did make the claim I accused you of. Ok sweetie. You don't seem to be receiving much popular support for your claims as to not being a liar. And I'll still go by the examples of your posts, as opposed to your current logic twists in explicating them. Fantastic. So present them. Remember, if you can't show posts by me wanting to strip the rights of homosexuals, as you claimed, you are a liar by your own logic. Off you pop.
|
|
|
Post by bartlesby on Nov 24, 2024 15:02:10 GMT
I'm not triggered. I'm just piling on for my own entertainment. And I guess the joke, at least in my mind, comes from your past defense of Russell Brand fucking a 16 year old. At least in terms of his YouTube monetization. I'm sure Molly was referencing that, lol And did I defend his having sex with a 16 year old, which would be legal in the UK anyway? Or did I defend the presumption of innocence? Try harder. Well, it doesn't really matter, you defended it either way. And just like your joke, it's an exaggeration, anyway. So why are you so upset about it?
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Nov 24, 2024 15:08:29 GMT
I'm sure Molly was referencing that, lol And did I defend his having sex with a 16 year old, which would be legal in the UK anyway? Or did I defend the presumption of innocence? Try harder. Well, it doesn't really matter, you defended it either way. And just like your joke, it's an exaggeration, anyway. So why are you so upset about it? Well, it kinda does matter since you made it up, lol I've never defended Brands actions, merely the fact that people are innocent until proven guilty and we should not be punished based on allegations. So you've invented a position I never had, to defend Molly, for some reason. Just like Molly, and Dracula and Amy.
|
|