|
Post by movieliker on Apr 28, 2023 18:19:40 GMT
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Apr 28, 2023 18:32:39 GMT
This is consistent with consensus. Because; "In the 1970s, college students in archaeology learned that the first human beings to arrive in North America had come over a land bridge from Asia and Siberia approximately 13,000 to 13,500 years ago. These people, the first North Americans, were known collectively as Clovis people."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2023 1:05:27 GMT
What is interesting is that South America was populated before North America, the first humans came to South America about 15,000 years ago.
Also in theory as the landbridge between Asia and North America formed 35,700 years ago, there could have been people in North America before the Clovis people, but they may not have left any trace, or archeologist have just not found them yet, I am not saying its the case, i am just saying its possible.
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Apr 29, 2023 3:39:02 GMT
What is interesting is that South America was populated before North America, the first humans came to South America about 15,000 years ago. Also in theory as the landbridge between Asia and North America formed 35,700 years ago, there could have been people in North America before the Clovis people, but they may not have left any trace, or archeologist have just not found them yet, I am not saying its the case, i am just saying its possible. Why do you think South America was populated before North America?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2023 9:22:25 GMT
What is interesting is that South America was populated before North America, the first humans came to South America about 15,000 years ago. Also in theory as the landbridge between Asia and North America formed 35,700 years ago, there could have been people in North America before the Clovis people, but they may not have left any trace, or archeologist have just not found them yet, I am not saying its the case, i am just saying its possible. Why do you think South America was populated before North America? Its not me who thinks it, its archeologist who have found bones in South America that are older than the bones found in North America.
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Apr 29, 2023 12:58:04 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2023 14:43:08 GMT
Took me 5 seconds to find Study shows ancient humans arrived in South America in multiple wavesHow people settled the Americas is a debate that has continued for years in the scientific community. It’s now clear that the first human entry into the Americas began at least 15,000 years ago and dispersed quickly into South America following a coastal Pacific route.www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2017/02/032.html
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Apr 29, 2023 14:53:51 GMT
Took me 5 seconds to find Study shows ancient humans arrived in South America in multiple wavesHow people settled the Americas is a debate that has continued for years in the scientific community. It’s now clear that the first human entry into the Americas began at least 15,000 years ago and dispersed quickly into South America following a coastal Pacific route.www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2017/02/032.htmlYour quoted and linked to article says nothing about South America being populated before North America. Matter of fact is says the South America people came across the Alaska/Asia landbrige through North America to get to South America.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2023 14:57:28 GMT
Oh you are one of those people.
Ignore facts you don`t like, i got it.
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Apr 29, 2023 15:11:14 GMT
Oh you are one of those people. Ignore facts you don`t like, i got it. The facts are, you said South America was populated before North America. I have posted quotes and links to articles saying that is wrong. And you have quoted and posted articles saying I am correct, and you are wrong. Seems like you are the one ignoring the facts.
|
|
|
Post by PaulsLaugh on May 4, 2023 1:04:18 GMT
What is interesting is that South America was populated before North America, the first humans came to South America about 15,000 years ago. Also in theory as the landbridge between Asia and North America formed 35,700 years ago, there could have been people in North America before the Clovis people, but they may not have left any trace, or archeologist have just not found them yet, I am not saying its the case, i am just saying its possible. It’s possible a pre-Clovis migration happened with the Asian population sticking to the Pacific coast when there was more of it. A lot of archaeology is lost under the sea. Post Clovis probably came more eastward into the NA continent.
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on May 4, 2023 12:15:55 GMT
What is interesting is that South America was populated before North America, the first humans came to South America about 15,000 years ago. Also in theory as the landbridge between Asia and North America formed 35,700 years ago, there could have been people in North America before the Clovis people, but they may not have left any trace, or archeologist have just not found them yet, I am not saying its the case, i am just saying its possible. It’s possible a pre-Clovis migration happened with the Asian population sticking to the Pacific coast when there was more of it. A lot of archaeology is lost under the sea. Post Clovis probably came more eastward into the NA continent. Most of the evidence supports the theory that most humans in the Western Hemisphere came across the Alaskan/Siberia land bridge, south through North America first, second through Central America, and last into South America. Maybe some people came across the South Pacific. But no evidence they got very far. But this suggestion that South America was populated first, is not only ridiculous, but as Balian d'Ibelin has shown, it's indefensible.
|
|
|
Post by PaulsLaugh on May 4, 2023 12:28:02 GMT
It’s possible a pre-Clovis migration happened with the Asian population sticking to the Pacific coast when there was more of it. A lot of archaeology is lost under the sea. Post Clovis probably came more eastward into the NA continent. Most of the evidence supports the theory that most humans in the Western Hemisphere came across the Alaskan/Siberia land bridge, south through North America first, second through Central America, and last into South America. Maybe some people came across the South Pacific. But no evidence they got very far. But the suggestion that South America was populated first, is not only ridiculous, but as Balian d'Ibelin has shown, it's indefensible. It’s defensible if the evidence is there.
|
|
|
Post by bomtombadil on May 4, 2023 13:31:47 GMT
What is interesting is that South America was populated before North America, the first humans came to South America about 15,000 years ago. Also in theory as the landbridge between Asia and North America formed 35,700 years ago, there could have been people in North America before the Clovis people, but they may not have left any trace, or archeologist have just not found them yet, I am not saying its the case, i am just saying its possible. Why do you think South America was populated before North America? I've read a few times about the theory that Polynesian type folks island hopped their way to South America possibly earlier than the land bridgers up north way.
|
|
|
Post by gwyn on May 4, 2023 13:39:13 GMT
Why do you think South America was populated before North America? I've read a few times about the theory that Polynesian type folks island hopped their way to South America possibly earlier than the land bridgers up north way. Didn't you first approach me with an offering of baby conehead skulls? 🤔 You just stake out these boards lookin' for posts about skulls and when you can't find one, you make it yourself. Confess !
|
|