|
Post by jeffersoncody on Jun 26, 2023 7:35:34 GMT
It doesn’t matter how many kids gays have or don’t have and children are more often an unplanned consequence of recreational sex than family planning. How about the straight people who are not having children? You seem to think “straight” means a desire to have a family. There are millions upon millions of straight parents who neglect their children. This has been the way of world since the Stone Age. They either can’t or won’t give their children a proper quality of life. There are way more straights willing to have kids than those that don't. That is the hetero dynamic. Plenty of women though won't have them because no man would want them.
If they aren't able to afford their brood a proper quality of life, then they can get neutered. Have you ever wanted to have a child Toastie, and how do you feels about cats and dogs?
|
|
|
Post by PaulsLaugh on Jun 26, 2023 7:35:43 GMT
How many children do you have, Papa?
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Jun 26, 2023 7:39:22 GMT
There does come a point where the woman gets tired of carrying the baby about all the time. I wonder if stupid babies carry lower than the smarter ones. It’s the stupid babies who don’t know how to leave without causing problems.
|
|
|
Post by PaulsLaugh on Jun 26, 2023 7:40:29 GMT
I wonder if stupid babies carry lower than the smarter ones. It’s the stupid babies who don’t know how to leave without causing problems. I’m guessing Six’s mother carried him for eleven months.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2023 7:41:25 GMT
Quite a leap there. Just because gays cannot have children with each other (let's ignore surrogacy for a second here) they want anarchy or disorder? Is that the question?
Even if suddenly no one wanted to have children, most would still want some kind of order and stability.
However, having children can definitely encourage more maturity in society
For the rugrats you would want: -a nice and safe neighborhood and society in general -attempt to or take better care of the environment as it will be their future -reasonable infrastructure and city planning etc
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Jun 26, 2023 7:44:28 GMT
It’s the stupid babies who don’t know how to leave without causing problems. I’m guessing Six’s mother carried him for eleven months. He’s special and was fast tracked so it was only a seven week stay. Probably decorated the womb while he was in there.
|
|
|
Post by Power Ranger on Jun 26, 2023 7:59:27 GMT
I think many young leftist radicals of all sexual orientations are angry at society and want to burn it down. It’s the foolish ones who keep that opinion as they get older.
It’s evidenced in their desire for completely open borders and a complete overhaul of all of our institutions and traditions. They don’t realise what will happen if it occurs.
It’s why some factions of the right should be more tolerant of gays. Gays can be our allies. It also means they will less likely to succumb to the extreme edges of LGBT debates, especially regarding children and women’s spaces. They won’t listen to reason from the right if the right is shunning them.
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Jun 26, 2023 8:26:11 GMT
Giving birth is egotistical within itself. Only, I think, when you try to find reasons for it beyond biology. Following your natural instincts is the very opposite of being egoistical because they exist for the good of the species. Not for you. What is the natural instinct of gay person? It's certainly not to breed with females.
Biology and its base sexual attraction to it creates a conundrum. You are still not convincing me that pro-creation of humans is good for the species. Its a fixed mindset the breeder takes about body self and life being created. It is purely egotistical arrogance.
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Jun 26, 2023 8:26:38 GMT
Giving birth is egotistical within itself. There does come a point where the woman gets tired of carrying the baby about all the time. Then she shouldn't have it.
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Jun 26, 2023 8:29:00 GMT
I think many young leftist radicals of all sexual orientations are angry at society and want to burn it down. It’s the foolish ones who keep that opinion as they get older. It’s evidenced in their desire for completely open borders and a complete overhaul of all of our institutions and traditions. They don’t realise what will happen if it occurs. It’s why some factions of the right should be more tolerant of gays. Gays can be our allies. It also means they will less likely to succumb to the extreme edges of LGBT debates, especially regarding children and women’s spaces. They won’t listen to reason from the right if the right is shunning them. And the extremist right doesn't really understand why they are shunning them. And the fundie left is taking it way too far. Both right and left breed and they need to accept what they create, not then condemn what they don't like. They are enforcing their perceptions of life as being human and superior to all other species.
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Jun 26, 2023 8:29:08 GMT
There does come a point where the woman gets tired of carrying the baby about all the time. Then she shouldn't have it. Funniest quote of the week.
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Jun 26, 2023 8:30:14 GMT
There does come a point where the woman gets tired of carrying the baby about all the time. I wonder if stupid babies carry lower than the smarter ones. Well we all know you were carried like a dingle berry, being as stoopid as you are.
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Jun 26, 2023 8:33:02 GMT
The biological programming is not the same for everyone and it is hetero unions that are creating gay humans. Something they go into denial about it they don't turn out "normal" straight. Sexual attraction is hormonal and innate. Humans aren't really surviving into much worth preserving. Of course the programming is not the same. There are variations of behavioral patterns which allow an individual to survive, thrive and pass on their genes. Also there is a not a single case of "gayness". Especially now.Please elaborate.
Conditioning is not going to change who one is sexually attracted too, but it sure does change how a person can turn out regarding attitude and behavior.
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Jun 26, 2023 8:33:58 GMT
Then she shouldn't have it. Funniest quote of the week. I really don't find it amusing that the majority of assholes on this planet have children they turn into assholes.
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Jun 26, 2023 8:36:13 GMT
There are way more straights willing to have kids than those that don't. That is the hetero dynamic. Plenty of women though won't have them because no man would want them.
If they aren't able to afford their brood a proper quality of life, then they can get neutered. Have you ever wanted to have a child Toastie, and how do you feels about cats and dogs? I never wanted to have a child. Its not in my genes or makeup. It is beneath me.
As for animals, fur babies are substitutes. I've had cats as pets and can appreciate others animals in small doses, but I will never go down that track again.
|
|