|
|
Post by papamihel on Jun 25, 2023 15:26:36 GMT
"Gay people have no children and consequently no interest in creating a socially stable future."
Something I read.
I don't mean to offend and I hope we can discuss this as adults.
Most of our behavior is regulated by our biological "programming". I like to think that intellect can always overcome it but I am probably wrong.
So here is the question: is our true interest in socially stable future tied to our biological drive to procreate and create conditions for our issue to thrive? And if so, what about those unable or unwilling to have children?
|
|
|
|
Post by 🐾 Molly 🐾 on Jun 25, 2023 15:33:22 GMT
"Gay people have no children and consequently no interest in creating a socially stable future." Something I read. I don't mean to offend and I hope we can discuss this as adults. Most of our behavior is regulated by our biological "programming". I like to think that intellect can always overcome it but I am probably wrong. So here is the question: is our true interest in socially stable future tied to our biological drive to procreate and create conditions for our issue to thrive? And if so, what about those unable or unwilling to have children? Gay people can and do have children, either through surrogacy or adoption. When you start the conversation with a false premise, then there is nowhere to go. |
|
|
|
Post by coolbeans on Jun 25, 2023 15:34:51 GMT
Don't Elton John and Rosie O'Donnel have children? People who want children will always outnumber those who don't, especially in third world countries.
|
|
|
|
Post by notoriousnobbi on Jun 25, 2023 15:43:01 GMT
Gay people often do have relatives with children. You wouldn't accuse a childless uncle or a childness aunt of having no interest in the future of their nephews and nieces, would you?
|
|
|
|
Post by papamihel on Jun 25, 2023 15:44:13 GMT
"Gay people have no children and consequently no interest in creating a socially stable future." Something I read. I don't mean to offend and I hope we can discuss this as adults. Most of our behavior is regulated by our biological "programming". I like to think that intellect can always overcome it but I am probably wrong. So here is the question: is our true interest in socially stable future tied to our biological drive to procreate and create conditions for our issue to thrive? And if so, what about those unable or unwilling to have children? Gay people can and do have children, either through surrogacy or adoption. When you start the conversation with a false premise, then there is nowhere to go. Are you unable or unwilling to understand written text? |
|
|
|
Post by papamihel on Jun 25, 2023 15:45:45 GMT
Gay people often do have relatives with children. You wouldn't accuse a childless uncle or a childness aunt of having no interest in the future of their nephews and nieces, would you? Is that what this thread is about? I didn't think you were a man to stumble on trigger words. |
|
|
|
Post by 🐾 Molly 🐾 on Jun 25, 2023 15:47:04 GMT
Gay people can and do have children, either through surrogacy or adoption. When you start the conversation with a false premise, then there is nowhere to go. Are you unable or unwilling to understand written text? I read perfectly fine. Your premise is that gay people have no drive to procreate, which is false. Again, you are starting with a false premise. |
|
|
|
Post by notoriousnobbi on Jun 25, 2023 15:54:43 GMT
Gay people often do have relatives with children. You wouldn't accuse a childless uncle or a childness aunt of having no interest in the future of their nephews and nieces, would you? Is that what this thread is about? I didn't think you were a man to stumble on trigger words. No, I want you to recognize that people who create narratives like are not interested in having a scientific discussion, they want to put smear on gay people instead. There are also (both hetero and gay) persons who decide for themselves to have no kids - BECAUSE they are worried of the future of all other kids. Scientists in the meantime study the role of aunts and uncles in the animal kingdom... |
|
|
|
Post by Swimm on Jun 25, 2023 15:56:06 GMT
Gay people can and do have children, either through surrogacy or adoption. When you start the conversation with a false premise, then there is nowhere to go. Are you unable or unwilling to understand written text? Add a large fry and a shake and she'll understand |
|
|
|
Post by Swimm on Jun 25, 2023 15:57:11 GMT
Are you unable or unwilling to understand written text? I read perfectly fine. Your premise is that gay people have no drive to procreate, which is false. Again, you are starting with a false premise. Cool. So Gay couples are adopting at the same rate hetero couples are giving birth? |
|
|
|
Post by Prince Myshkin on Jun 25, 2023 15:58:36 GMT
"Gay people have no children and consequently no interest in creating a socially stable future." Something I read. I don't mean to offend and I hope we can discuss this as adults. Most of our behavior is regulated by our biological "programming". I like to think that intellect can always overcome it but I am probably wrong. So here is the question: is our true interest in socially stable future tied to our biological drive to procreate and create conditions for our issue to thrive? And if so, what about those unable or unwilling to have children? Gay people can and do have children, either through surrogacy or adoption. When you start the conversation with a false premise, then there is nowhere to go. Gay men who take children from their mothers are douchebags.
Gay men who use surrogates are cowardly and manipulative. You don't deprive a baby of a mother by design. Get over yourself. A baby is not a prop and it's not all about YOU.
Homosexuality is non-reproductive for a reason. There are no buttbabies. If a man wants a kid, find a good woman.
The Homo Superior has spoken. ![[shades]](http://storage.proboards.com/6870873/images/xuHnLEnLTSNptewaqJsQ.gif) |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2023 16:00:46 GMT
Are you unable or unwilling to understand written text? I read perfectly fine. Your premise is that gay people have no drive to procreate, which is false. Again, you are starting with a false premise. No one in the world ever got pregnant from gay sex. His statement is correct. Gay people tend to rarely have children compare to straight people. |
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Jun 25, 2023 16:04:41 GMT
"Gay people have no children and consequently no interest in creating a socially stable future." Something I read. I don't mean to offend and I hope we can discuss this as adults. Most of our behavior is regulated by our biological "programming". I like to think that intellect can always overcome it but I am probably wrong. So here is the question: is our true interest in socially stable future tied to our biological drive to procreate and create conditions for our issue to thrive? And if so, what about those unable or unwilling to have children? Gay people can and do have children, either through surrogacy or adoption. When you start the conversation with a false premise, then there is nowhere to go. Surrogacy is of a child created from an forgotten anonymous sperm donor or if it's two men a disposable no longer needed pregnant host, neither are a particularly stable way of starting an existence living as a must have accessory. |
|
|
|
Post by kiwi on Jun 25, 2023 16:07:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jeffersoncody on Jun 25, 2023 16:11:43 GMT
You should address your questions to gay married posters on the board who have adopted children. I'm sure we have at least one.
|
|
