|
|
Post by jackspicer on Nov 21, 2024 23:47:53 GMT
It was a logistical nightmare from the beginning.
By letting the Osundairo brothers go, the police basically admitted it wasn't a big deal.
If it's not a big deal for the Osundairos to receive payment, buy the supplies, and commit the act, then it's not a big deal for Smollett to pay them to do it and report it.
MAGA needed to let it go, but couldn't.
Why are you OK with hate crime hoaxes? |
|
|
|
Post by mikemonger on Nov 21, 2024 23:51:05 GMT
He's gay, black, and a lib - he can do whatever he wants. Even white women can't get away with what he did. Heh. A Trumpbot complaining about someone getting away with it. |
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Nov 21, 2024 23:52:40 GMT
He's gay, black, and a lib - he can do whatever he wants. Even white women can't get away with what he did. Heh. A Trumpbot complaining about someone getting away with it. Jussie committed crimes that actually exist on the law books. Trump did not. |
|
|
|
Post by mikemonger on Nov 21, 2024 23:56:32 GMT
Heh. A Trumpbot complaining about someone getting away with it. Jussie committed crimes that actually exist on the law books. Trump did not. Theft of government property is a crime in the books. And yes we all know you'll ignore all the facts you need to, so don't bother. |
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Nov 22, 2024 0:24:53 GMT
Jussie committed crimes that actually exist on the law books. Trump did not. Theft of government property is a crime in the books. And yes we all know you'll ignore all the facts you need to, so don't bother. Trump did not commit theft of government property. |
|
|
|
Post by mikemonger on Nov 22, 2024 0:28:19 GMT
Theft of government property is a crime in the books. And yes we all know you'll ignore all the facts you need to, so don't bother. Trump did not commit theft of government property. Literally the only way you can claim that is by ignoring a slew of facts INCLUDING TRUMP HIMSELF acknowledging he was in possession of government property thst he repeatedly refused to return. Like I said, we all already know you'll ignore all the facts you need to in order to repeat your talking point. |
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Nov 22, 2024 1:29:41 GMT
Trump did not commit theft of government property. Literally the only way you can claim that is by ignoring a slew of facts INCLUDING TRUMP HIMSELF acknowledging he was in possession of government property thst he repeatedly refused to return. Like I said, we all already know you'll ignore all the facts you need to in order to repeat your talking point. The law does not say what you claim it says. And you know those were copies that Trump had, right? NARA already had their own copies. |
|
|
|
Post by mikemonger on Nov 22, 2024 1:31:53 GMT
Literally the only way you can claim that is by ignoring a slew of facts INCLUDING TRUMP HIMSELF acknowledging he was in possession of government property thst he repeatedly refused to return. Like I said, we all already know you'll ignore all the facts you need to in order to repeat your talking point. The law does not say what you claim it says. And you know those were copies that Trump had, right? NARA already had their own copies. The guy who thinks "keep your stuff seperate" is the same thing as "you can declare anything you want yours" is in no position to talk about what the law says...lol And yes, we all noticed yoy trying to shift the discussion away from your reliance on ignoring most of the facts. |
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Nov 22, 2024 1:57:58 GMT
The law does not say what you claim it says. And you know those were copies that Trump had, right? NARA already had their own copies. The guy who thinks "keep your stuff seperate" is the same thing as "you can declare anything you want yours" is in no position to talk about what the law says...lol And yes, we all noticed yoy trying to shift the discussion away from your reliance on ignoring most of the facts. 1. President Trump had the authority to categorize documents as personal or presidential. 2. They were copies that NARA already had. 3. The case was dismissed. |
|
|
|
Post by mikemonger on Nov 22, 2024 2:05:07 GMT
The guy who thinks "keep your stuff seperate" is the same thing as "you can declare anything you want yours" is in no position to talk about what the law says...lol And yes, we all noticed yoy trying to shift the discussion away from your reliance on ignoring most of the facts. 1. President Trump had the authority to categorize documents as personal or presidential. 2. They were copies that NARA already had. 3. The case was dismissed. You've already repeated your thoroughly debunked talking points and ignored most of the facts in dozens of threads. Come up with some new material. |
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Nov 22, 2024 6:32:31 GMT
1. President Trump had the authority to categorize documents as personal or presidential. 2. They were copies that NARA already had. 3. The case was dismissed. You've already repeated your thoroughly debunked talking points and ignored most of the facts in dozens of threads. Come up with some new material. Everything I said is fact. |
|
|
|
Post by gwyn on Nov 22, 2024 6:38:25 GMT
The law does not say what you claim it says. And you know those were copies that Trump had, right? NARA already had their own copies. The guy who thinks "keep your stuff seperate" is the same thing as "you can declare anything you want yours" is in no position to talk about what the law says...lol And yes, we all noticed yoy trying to shift the discussion away from your reliance on ignoring most of the facts. Do you seriously not know that POTUS has the authority to declassify classified US government documents? Maybe a nice tech themed series of threads from you would be a good addition to the boards. |
|
|
|
Post by gwyn on Nov 22, 2024 6:40:25 GMT
You've already repeated your thoroughly debunked talking points and ignored most of the facts in dozens of threads. Come up with some new material. Everything I said is fact. But he falsely invoked “thoroughly debunked talking points” so he wins. 🤪🤪🤪 |
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Nov 22, 2024 13:27:52 GMT
This is how they waste their time? How about freeing people unjustly incarcerated? No. It's important. Yes, he's guilty. But the Chicago prosecutor broke the rules. |
|
|
|
Post by Winter_King on Nov 22, 2024 13:29:40 GMT
|
|
