Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2023 18:12:43 GMT
So report them to the authorities. Pfffffft. Stop playing dumb. Again, with many of these issues of biological sex and sexual orientation, equality does not equal sameness.
When laws require no discrimination based on sexuality, the system gives no preference to male/female couples over twittering queens who want to play house.
The "authorities" are allowing the abuse.
So these people are just twittering queens who want to play house. Prejudice noted. And your understanding of child abuse is fucked up. If you cared about these children you wouldn’t refer to the as snot nosed brats. Or lames. I almost forgot that one. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2023 18:15:49 GMT
A good friend of mine acquired HIV from her husband who was sharing needles. "Gay" had nothing to do with it. He died from the disease, but hers was caught early enough that she had a longer life span. It is an infectious disease that doesn't care how it gets transmitted or to whom. Again, it just looks for suitable hosts. Okay. So he's part of the minority in how people catch AIDS. Statistically speaking, he probably shared the needle with a gay person. And yes, as I cited, straight sex has a 2% chance of transmission but anal sex has 20% transmission rate. Guess which one the gays are having? And much more frequently and promiscuously I might add. |
|
|
|
Post by scream on Jun 26, 2023 18:25:39 GMT
Oy vey. HIV is acquired through sexual intercourse, both anal and vaginal. Straights can get it just like gays can.
We know it began in Africa among heterosexuals. 28% of the adults in the African country of Eswatini have HIV. That's heterosexuals who acquire it through vaginal intercourse.
It entered the West via a gay male airline steward and the epidemic started among us first. So it's localized here among gay men. That's not the case allover the world.
Sigh. No one is saying that straight men can't get it. However, gay men are far more promiscuous on average and far more likely to have anal sex. Anal sex is way riskier when it comes to STDs. It just is. stanfordhealthcare.org/medical-conditions/sexual-and-reproductive-health/hiv-aids/causes/risk-of-exposure.html And to show you how promiscuous gay men are, that patient zero you're talking about infected 250 men. Given an anal transmission rate of 20%, that means he probably slept with 1250 men. That Patient Zero was indeed promiscuous, but that doesn't represent all gay men any more than hetero men that are promiscuous represent all hetero men. Gaeton Dugas shared some of his contacts with the CDC, but it was never quantified for a total of how many people he had exposed or infected, because of the anonymous nature of his contacts. Go watch "And the Band Played On", based on Randy Shilt's book. Or better yet, go read "The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World out of Balance" by Laurie Garrett. Published in 1993, it covers not just AIDS but Ebola, Bolivian Hemorrhagic Fever, Dengue Fever, Malaria, even Legionnaire's disease. Here's the link to the website: www.lauriegarrett.com/the-coming-plague |
|
|
|
Post by Prince Myshkin on Jun 26, 2023 18:31:05 GMT
Pfffffft. Stop playing dumb. Again, with many of these issues of biological sex and sexual orientation, equality does not equal sameness.
When laws require no discrimination based on sexuality, the system gives no preference to male/female couples over twittering queens who want to play house.
The "authorities" are allowing the abuse.
So these people are just twittering queens who want to play house. Prejudice noted. And your understanding of child abuse is fucked up. If you cared about these children you wouldn’t refer to the as snot nosed brats. Or lames. I almost forgot that one. I'm being snarky. But of course you never are. ![[eyeroll]](http://storage.proboards.com/6870873/images/TYpDCPXPWyMKZsuBDttK.gif)
Yes, if a man wants to have children he finds a good woman and they start a family together.
If a man is fucking another man in the ass and he wants to make babies, he's doing it all wrong.
There are advantages to being gay and there are advantages to be being straight.
Yeah, I have no patience for giddy gay men who want babies. It's just silly. And they're depriving those babies of mothers. Get a doll, stupid faggot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2023 18:33:56 GMT
So these people are just twittering queens who want to play house. Prejudice noted. And your understanding of child abuse is fucked up. If you cared about these children you wouldn’t refer to the as snot nosed brats. Or lames. I almost forgot that one. I'm being snarky. But of course you never are.
Yes, if a man wants to have children he finds a good woman and they start a family together.
If a man is fucking another man in the ass and he wants to make babies, he's doing it all wrong.
There are advantages to being gay and there are advantages to be being straight.
Yeah, I have no patience for giddy gay men who want babies. It's just silly. And they're depriving those babies of mothers. Get a doll, stupid faggot.
So calling a child with a disability “lame” is nothing more than snarkism. Got it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2023 18:36:12 GMT
I'm being snarky. But of course you never are.
Yes, if a man wants to have children he finds a good woman and they start a family together.
If a man is fucking another man in the ass and he wants to make babies, he's doing it all wrong.
There are advantages to being gay and there are advantages to be being straight.
Yeah, I have no patience for giddy gay men who want babies. It's just silly. And they're depriving those babies of mothers. Get a doll, stupid faggot.
"Get a doll, stupid faggot." Imdb1 quote of the day! 😆 🤣 😂 Most parents know that you don’t put a child back in the toy box when you’ve finished playing with him/her. |
|
|
|
Post by Prince Myshkin on Jun 26, 2023 18:38:21 GMT
Oy vey. HIV is acquired through sexual intercourse, both anal and vaginal. Straights can get it just like gays can.
We know it began in Africa among heterosexuals. 28% of the adults in the African country of Eswatini have HIV. That's heterosexuals who acquire it through vaginal intercourse.
It entered the West via a gay male airline steward and the epidemic started among us first. So it's localized here among gay men. That's not the case allover the world.
Sigh. No one is saying that straight men can't get it. However, gay men are far more promiscuous on average and far more likely to have anal sex. Anal sex is way riskier when it comes to STDs. It just is. stanfordhealthcare.org/medical-conditions/sexual-and-reproductive-health/hiv-aids/causes/risk-of-exposure.html And to show you how promiscuous gay men are, that patient zero you're talking about infected 250 men. Given an anal transmission rate of 20%, that means he probably slept with 1250 men. Dude, I'm not disagreeing with you that gay men are more promiscuous. But you know why that's true? We have more opportunity because all males are perpetually horny bastards. But women put restraints on straight men. If two gay men wanna fuck we just fuck. We don't have to be sweet and we don't have to buy dinner. Yeah, all men are more promiscuous but gay men just have more opportunity.
But the stats show that heterosexuals in Africa are getting aids at higher rates than heterosexuals in the West. Vaginal intercourse spreads HIV.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prince Myshkin on Jun 26, 2023 18:41:17 GMT
I'm being snarky. But of course you never are.
Yes, if a man wants to have children he finds a good woman and they start a family together.
If a man is fucking another man in the ass and he wants to make babies, he's doing it all wrong.
There are advantages to being gay and there are advantages to be being straight.
Yeah, I have no patience for giddy gay men who want babies. It's just silly. And they're depriving those babies of mothers. Get a doll, stupid faggot.
So calling a child with a disability “lame” is nothing more than snarkism. Got it. I said "lame or game". It was a snarky rhyme and it was worth it.
I dunno, slur words like "lame" or "faggot" don't bother me.
|
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Jun 26, 2023 18:42:30 GMT
" Gay people have no children and consequently no interest in creating a socially stable future." Something I read. I don't mean to offend and I hope we can discuss this as adults. Most of our behavior is regulated by our biological "programming". I like to think that intellect can always overcome it but I am probably wrong. So here is the question: is our true interest in socially stable future tied to our biological drive to procreate and create conditions for our issue to thrive? And if so, what about those unable or unwilling to have children?  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2023 18:43:11 GMT
So calling a child with a disability “lame” is nothing more than snarkism. Got it. I said "lame or game". It was a snarky rhyme and it was worth it.
I dunno, slur words like "lame" or "faggot" don't bother me.
"Faggot" privilege Sorry, I had too, you can take a joke... |
|
|
|
Post by Prince Myshkin on Jun 26, 2023 18:45:01 GMT
I said "lame or game". It was a snarky rhyme and it was worth it.
I dunno, slur words like "lame" or "faggot" don't bother me.
"Faggot" privilege Sorry, I had too, you can take a joke... I have white male faggot privilege and I love it. ![[crown]](http://storage.proboards.com/6870873/images/IYsqbCUWmJgaqSjFJfva.gif) |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2023 18:57:52 GMT
So calling a child with a disability “lame” is nothing more than snarkism. Got it. I said "lame or game". It was a snarky rhyme and it was worth it.
I dunno, slur words like "lame" or "faggot" don't bother me.
I know it was part of a rhyme but it still showed a limited understanding of disability. But if you’re fine with it who are we to object? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2023 18:59:43 GMT
So calling a child with a disability “lame” is nothing more than snarkism. Got it. I said "lame or game". It was a snarky rhyme and it was worth it.
I dunno, slur words like "lame" or "faggot" don't bother me.
By the way, remember how you took issue with Green Rabbit referring to “gaysexuals”? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2023 18:59:52 GMT
Sigh. No one is saying that straight men can't get it. However, gay men are far more promiscuous on average and far more likely to have anal sex. Anal sex is way riskier when it comes to STDs. It just is. stanfordhealthcare.org/medical-conditions/sexual-and-reproductive-health/hiv-aids/causes/risk-of-exposure.html And to show you how promiscuous gay men are, that patient zero you're talking about infected 250 men. Given an anal transmission rate of 20%, that means he probably slept with 1250 men. That Patient Zero was indeed promiscuous, but that doesn't represent all gay men any more than hetero men that are promiscuous represent all hetero men. Gaeton Dugas shared some of his contacts with the CDC, but it was never quantified for a total of how many people he had exposed or infected, because of the anonymous nature of his contacts. Go watch "And the Band Played On", based on Randy Shilt's book. Or better yet, go read "The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World out of Balance" by Laurie Garrett. Published in 1993, it covers not just AIDS but Ebola, Bolivian Hemorrhagic Fever, Dengue Fever, Malaria, even Legionnaire's disease. Here's the link to the website: www.lauriegarrett.com/the-coming-plagueThe "but not all gay people are promiscuous" fallacy. How many non celebrity hetero men do you know that had sex with 1250 people? Gay people are far more promiscuous on average and it isn't even close. That's why the culture is so infested with AIDS. |
|
|
|
Post by Prince Myshkin on Jun 26, 2023 19:18:42 GMT
I said "lame or game". It was a snarky rhyme and it was worth it.
I dunno, slur words like "lame" or "faggot" don't bother me.
By the way, remember how you took issue with Green Rabbit referring to “gaysexuals”? Lol. I was just giving her a hard time.
C'mon, even you have to admit that it becomes rather arbitrary which words are acceptable and which are not. If people tell me they object to a term, I won't call them that. But in general, if the words are used honestly and not merely to offend, I don't see a problem.
|
|
