|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Mar 14, 2024 4:10:18 GMT
The US supports Israel and at the same time launders public funds through Iraq which in turn funds Hamas. All a deliberate political ruse and conundrum. And you prove all this bullshit, I’m sure. Anyway, it never bothered you Trump was a money launderer. Trump was a private business man, government are fronts for elitist corporations and industrial complexes. Govt will extort and invest tax payers funds called foreign policy for their own self-serving interests. Prove to me that’s not what’s happening, or is your head further stuck up your media zombie derrière? |
|
|
|
Post by SciFive on Mar 14, 2024 8:40:43 GMT
Bibi Netanyahu did that with his policies, not me. And no will embargo Israel. The USA is its biggest benefactor and Joe Biden will not let that happen. So Netanyahu is responsible for Islamic terrorism, which extends way beyond Israel? No US president would ever not support Israel. It’s not a partisan thing. Israel will and must prevail. The haters like to blame Netanyahu for things that started before he was born.
It's weird as hell, but it's their addiction.
They blame everything on Netanyahu.
|
|
|
|
Post by Winter_King on Mar 14, 2024 9:20:14 GMT
No. That wasn't my reasoning. It is your reasoning applied to WWII. You said, "Israel doesn't have to attempt to kill all 2 million Palestinians for the action to be considered genocide." Well, WWII Allied bombing killed hundreds of thousands of German and Japanese civilians. By your logic, that is Genocide. Well as I said, it's not my reasoning or my logic. It's what you think my reasoning is and with some quote mining on your part too. Not sure if deliberate or not. What I said was: And I gave an example of a massacre that killed 8000 civilians and was considered an act of genocide. Considerably less than the civilian population killed in Gaza. The point being that one doesn't have to attempt to kill every member of a group for something to be considered genocide. Also, a lot of the actions undertaken by the Allies during World War 2 would have not being considered acceptable today given that World War 2 was fought as total war and updates to the laws of war made ever since. I certainly think there would be no merit to the argument that dropping a nuke on a city is acceptable because the US did it in World War 2. |
|
|
|
Post by SciFive on Mar 14, 2024 9:27:26 GMT
It is your reasoning applied to WWII. You said, "Israel doesn't have to attempt to kill all 2 million Palestinians for the action to be considered genocide." Well, WWII Allied bombing killed hundreds of thousands of German and Japanese civilians. By your logic, that is Genocide. Well as I said, it's not my reasoning or my logic. It's what you think my reasoning is and with some quote mining on your part too. Not sure if deliberate or not. What I said was: And I gave an example of a massacre that killed 8000 civilians and was considered an act of genocide. Considerably less than the civilian population killed in Gaza. The point being that one doesn't have to attempt to kill every member of a group for something to be considered genocide. Also, a lot of the actions undertaken by the Allies during World War 2 would have not being considered acceptable today given that World War 2 was fought as total war and updates to the laws of war made ever since. I certainly think there would be no merit to the argument that dropping a nuke on a city is acceptable because the US did it in World War 2. What's happening in Gaza is NOT a massacre.
Hamas is illegally using human shields so that they can continue to massacre Jews with rapes, mutilations, etc.
Israel tries to avoid the civilians but it's not possible to save all the human shields.
Israel has launched over 20,000 bombs into Gaza. If they were aiming at civilians, hundreds of thousands would be dead from these 20,000 bombs - not 31,000 (unless each bomb can only handle killing mostly one person at a time).
Keep this in mind: 8000 natural deaths occur in Gaza in 5 month periods. 13000 Hamas fighters have been killed. This leaves a smaller number of unintentional civilian war deaths.
|
|
|
|
Post by 🐕 🐕 🐕 🐕 🐕 🐈⬛ Molly on Mar 14, 2024 9:43:18 GMT
Well as I said, it's not my reasoning or my logic. It's what you think my reasoning is and with some quote mining on your part too. Not sure if deliberate or not. What I said was: And I gave an example of a massacre that killed 8000 civilians and was considered an act of genocide. Considerably less than the civilian population killed in Gaza. The point being that one doesn't have to attempt to kill every member of a group for something to be considered genocide. Also, a lot of the actions undertaken by the Allies during World War 2 would have not being considered acceptable today given that World War 2 was fought as total war and updates to the laws of war made ever since. I certainly think there would be no merit to the argument that dropping a nuke on a city is acceptable because the US did it in World War 2. Keep this in mind: 8000 natural deaths occur in Gaza in 5 month periods. 13000 Hamas fighters have been killed. This leaves a smaller number of unintentional civilian war deaths.
Again, I ask - natural causes as in “starvation” |
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Mar 14, 2024 13:53:31 GMT
So Netanyahu is responsible for Islamic terrorism, which extends way beyond Israel? No US president would ever not support Israel. It’s not a partisan thing. Israel will and must prevail. The haters like to blame Netanyahu for things that started before he was born.
It's weird as hell, but it's their addiction.
They blame everything on Netanyahu.
These leftist gits have to have something to hate on, be it Netanyahu which currently suits their agenda, or Trump. They are mentally ill. |
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Mar 14, 2024 14:07:46 GMT
Keep this in mind: 8000 natural deaths occur in Gaza in 5 month periods. 13000 Hamas fighters have been killed. This leaves a smaller number of unintentional civilian war deaths.
Again, I ask - natural causes as in “starvation” Me thinks you are naturally starved of intelligence. |
|
|
|
Post by SciFive on Mar 14, 2024 14:14:31 GMT
Again, I ask - natural causes as in “starvation” Me thinks you are naturally starved of intelligence. True.
The nutcase doesn't know that natural deaths occur even during wars.
If someone is dying of cancer or old age, a war doesn't keep Mr. Death away from sick people until the war has finished.
If this had happened during the 100 Years War, a number of people would have lived to be 150-200 years old. 
|
|
|
|
Post by 🐕 🐕 🐕 🐕 🐕 🐈⬛ Molly on Mar 14, 2024 14:56:03 GMT
Me thinks you are naturally starved of intelligence. True.
The nutcase doesn't know that natural deaths occur even during wars.
If someone is dying of cancer or old age, a war doesn't keep Mr. Death away from sick people until the war has finished.
If this had happened during the 100 Years War, a number of people would have lived to be 150-200 years old.
Are you really pretending to be unaware of tens of thousands that are suffering from dehydration and starvation in Gaza? Really? |
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Mar 15, 2024 2:14:01 GMT
True.
The nutcase doesn't know that natural deaths occur even during wars.
If someone is dying of cancer or old age, a war doesn't keep Mr. Death away from sick people until the war has finished.
If this had happened during the 100 Years War, a number of people would have lived to be 150-200 years old.
Are you really pretending to be unaware of tens of thousands that are suffering from dehydration and starvation in Gaza? Really? Why are you pretending to care? For what agenda! |
|
|
|
Post by SciFive on Mar 15, 2024 8:55:04 GMT
Are you really pretending to be unaware of tens of thousands that are suffering from dehydration and starvation in Gaza? Really? Why are you pretending to care? For what agenda! People are accusing Israel of killing the 8000 Gazans who die of natural causes in any normal 5 month period in Gaza. The agenda (after people realize that these Gazans would have died without a war going on) is to commit an attack on Jews. Thanks. |
|
|
|
Post by 🐕 🐕 🐕 🐕 🐕 🐈⬛ Molly on Mar 15, 2024 11:49:52 GMT
Why are you pretending to care? For what agenda! People are accusing Israel of killing the 8000 Gazans who die of natural causes in any normal 5 month period in Gaza. The agenda (after people realize that these Gazans would have died without a war going on) is to commit an attack on Jews. Thanks. I’d like to a source for your “8000 die of natural causes” and how you figure ACTUAL deaths that are REALLY due to natural causes are included in death tolls for war? Do you think deaths due to natural causes during any other war are included in death tolls? They aren’t. Nice try, sweetie. |
|
|
|
Post by SciFive on Mar 15, 2024 15:46:29 GMT
The Executive Producer (Jewish) of "The Zone of Interest" totally disagrees with what the director said in his hateful speech after winning an Oscar.
|
|
|
|
Post by marsatax on Mar 16, 2024 0:08:52 GMT
It is your reasoning applied to WWII. You said, "Israel doesn't have to attempt to kill all 2 million Palestinians for the action to be considered genocide." Well, WWII Allied bombing killed hundreds of thousands of German and Japanese civilians. By your logic, that is Genocide. Well as I said, it's not my reasoning or my logic. It's what you think my reasoning is and with some quote mining on your part too. Not sure if deliberate or not. What I said was: And I gave an example of a massacre that killed 8000 civilians and was considered an act of genocide. Considerably less than the civilian population killed in Gaza. The point being that one doesn't have to attempt to kill every member of a group for something to be considered genocide. Also, a lot of the actions undertaken by the Allies during World War 2 would have not being considered acceptable today given that World War 2 was fought as total war and updates to the laws of war made ever since. I certainly think there would be no merit to the argument that dropping a nuke on a city is acceptable because the US did it in World War 2.
The Serbs were killing Bosnians solely because they were Bosnians. That is Genocide. In contrast, Israel is not trying to kill the Palestinians of Gaza, but only Hamas. Also, a lot of the actions undertaken by the Allies during World War 2 would have not being considered acceptable today given that World War 2 was fought as total war and updates to the laws of war made ever since.
Do you consider them Genocide? By your reasoning, you should. |
|
|
|
Post by marsatax on Mar 16, 2024 0:14:44 GMT
So Netanyahu is responsible for Islamic terrorism, which extends way beyond Israel? No US president would ever not support Israel. It’s not a partisan thing. Israel will and must prevail. The haters like to blame Netanyahu for things that started before he was born.
It's weird as hell, but it's their addiction.
They blame everything on Netanyahu.
Embers11 always blamed Netanyahu for everything. I pointed out to her that she and her ilk will condemn Israel just as much when Netanyahu is no longer in office. |
|
