|
Post by averagejoe2021 on Apr 13, 2024 5:44:31 GMT
No...my latest point (that you claimed Trump supporters are the dumbest people you've ever seen) either demonstrates an insulated existence or ignorance to the statistical data showing the least educated back the Democrats overwhelmingly. Yes...neither option is perfect...but one has a better track record to allow people financial independence. Your thread went off the emails when you closed yourself off from people having valid reasons to support Trump. Aside from you making it clear you'll never accept otherwise there isn't anything left to say. First of all here, you are wrong again because you are using a survey of Democrats and I am using my survey of Trump followers, That isn't a binary choice. Secondly you fail to appreciate that there are fewer and fewer people the more intelligent they are, Your chart does not specify voting choices and doesn't refute the statistically least educated vote overwhelmingly for the Democrats. Turning in for the night. Have fun.
|
|
|
Post by SixOfTheRichest on Apr 13, 2024 7:20:25 GMT
To get Biden out of the way, he's a demented old fool.
|
|
|
Post by Carl LaFong on Apr 13, 2024 7:44:43 GMT
Yes. I believe in smaller and responsible government. You'll never gonna get that with democrats. A big far bloated government is how most of those bastards are getting rich. Yes, Trump certainly slashed spending when he was in charge. Oh wait … www.propublica.org/article/national-debt-trumpEconomists agree that we needed massive deficit spending during the COVID-19 crisis to ward off an economic cataclysm, but federal finances under Trump had become dire even before the pandemic. That happened even though the economy was booming and unemployment was at historically low levels. By the Trump administration’s own description, the pre-pandemic national debt level was already a “crisis” and a “grave threat.” The combination of Trump’s 2017 tax cut and the lack of any serious spending restraint helped both the deficit and the debt soar. So when the once-in-a-lifetime viral disaster slammed our country and we threw more than $3 trillion into COVID-19-related stimulus, there was no longer any margin for error. Our national debt has reached immense levels relative to our economy, nearly as high as it was at the end of World War II. But unlike 75 years ago, the massive financial overhang from Medicare and Social Security will make it dramatically more difficult to dig ourselves out of the debt ditch.
|
|
|
Post by notoriousnobbi on Apr 13, 2024 8:18:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by notoriousnobbi on Apr 13, 2024 8:22:52 GMT
As there are a lot of potential Trump voters gathered in this thread,
Are you aware of the geopolitical implications if Trump becomes president again and will you own the seismic shifts?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 13, 2024 8:34:46 GMT
As there are a lot of potential Trump voters gathered in this thread, I went through the thread and counted three; Joe, Jack, and Gumby. Four if TC is an American. Can't remember. What geopolitical implications? I'm not owning anything. I voted for Trump in '16, and that was the last time I voted. I'll never vote for anyone again.
|
|
|
Post by notoriousnobbi on Apr 13, 2024 8:38:17 GMT
What geopolitical implications? Thanks for that precise answer! :)
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 13, 2024 8:38:52 GMT
What geopolitical implications? Thanks for that precise answer! :) I'm still waiting for yours.
|
|
|
Post by notoriousnobbi on Apr 13, 2024 8:49:18 GMT
Thanks for that precise answer! :) I'm still waiting for yours. I've written sometimes on these. What did Your media write about the Munich Security Conference?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 13, 2024 8:57:36 GMT
I'm still waiting for yours. I've written sometimes on these. What did Your media write about the Munich Security Conference? Not much, but anything they wrote about it should be accessible by you. It would help if I knew what geopolitical implications and seismic shifts you meant. Human sacrifice? Dogs and cats living together? Mass hysteria?
|
|
|
Post by notoriousnobbi on Apr 13, 2024 9:06:02 GMT
I've written sometimes on these. What did Your media write about the Munich Security Conference? Not much, but anything they wrote about it should be accessible by you. It would help if I knew what geopolitical implications and seismic shifts you meant. Human sacrifice? Dogs and cats living together? Mass hysteria? Without getting too wordy: are you aware of which old allies you might lose and which new allies you might gain? Are you aware of the effects on your 'soft power' by being represented by Trump?
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Apr 13, 2024 9:50:47 GMT
As there are a lot of potential Trump voters gathered in this thread, Are you aware of the geopolitical implications if Trump becomes president again and will you own the seismic shifts? Seismic shifts like Biden dragging the United States into war with Iran and the Middle East because of Israel?
|
|
|
Post by Olaf Plunket on Apr 13, 2024 12:00:12 GMT
As there are a lot of potential Trump voters gathered in this thread, Are you aware of the geopolitical implications if Trump becomes president again and will you own the seismic shifts? Seismic shifts like Biden dragging the United States into war with Iran and the Middle East because of Israel? It is true that government in the United States is far too large. That problem became especially worse in order to win WWII. It has been rather difficult to undo that. Trump and his base think they can undo that. A problem is that Trump is too much of a nationalist. His nationalism has infected Israel, especially after he moved the U.S. Embassy for Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. The Jewish people and longstanding tradition are not such nationalists in character. That has been a reason for their remarkable ability to share space in the Middle East. The current trouble owes considerably to an energized nationalism of Israel. An irony is that Trump's nationalism is the result of government being too large. He and his base grew up with high expectations of what they can accomplish -- by using force of government. Trump wants more participation by European countries in a military solution as if there is one. There is a geopolitical implication for you, The Herald Erjen .
Banning abortion is yet another misuse of government force. People who are actually religious would rather their church deal with the problems and solutions to that and other social problems. That would really be smaller government.
|
|
|
Post by slowcomingwarbird on Apr 13, 2024 15:00:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 13, 2024 15:10:47 GMT
Not much, but anything they wrote about it should be accessible by you. It would help if I knew what geopolitical implications and seismic shifts you meant. Human sacrifice? Dogs and cats living together? Mass hysteria? Without getting too wordy: are you aware of which old allies you might lose and which new allies you might gain? Are you aware of the effects on your 'soft power' by being represented by Trump? Did something happen during Orange Man's first term, and I missed it? Or is something fated to happen during a second term if he should get it? Please explain.
|
|